Nataliya's Reviews > The Cat in the Hat
The Cat in the Hat (Cat in the Hat, #1)
by
by

This "kids' book" is, in my opinion, a nightmare-quality horror story. Why, you ask? What's scary about a funny-looking cat? *shudder* Well, what's so scary about these cute things?

(Well, there actually is nothing scary about that last one. That still doesn't make it any less of a nightmare.)
Sometimes I have nightmares where everything goes wrong, but I am helpless to do anything about it. What's worse, the voice of reason is gone. Well, that pretty much sums up the plot of this book. As a horror story, it gets solid 3 stars. Quick, somebody call Stephen King!
Two kids are left alone on a dreary rainy day - which by the way is a perfect setting for a horror story. (Sidenote: I am not that outraged with the mother leaving the kids unsupervised. In Eastern Europe parents do it all the time. And we survived ). Suddenly a stranger barges in and insists that the kids join him in his games (*cue ominous music here*). And he refuses to leave.
Yeah, if this creature barged into my house, I'd be curled up in a ball in a corner, wailing and wetting myself.

The sentient fish, who appears to supervise the kids and is the sole voice of sanity here, sensibly protests (He should not be here. He should not be about. He should not be here When your mother is out!) - and immediately gets physically threatened and abused. Terrified, it demands the abuse to stop - "This is no fun at all! Put me down! [...] I do NOT wish to fall!" - and narrowly avoids death. Hilarious, right?
Not to mention that, for a fish, seeing a cat is like you answering the doorbell just to greet a Grim Reaper.

Next, the terrifying delinquent Cat unleashes Things (perfect name for horror creatures) who wreck havoc on the house. Then the Cat cleans up and vanishes. Basically there is zero evidence left of this horrific intrusion even if the kids tried to tell. But likely the poor little victims will keep quiet. And who knows what will happen the next time the Cat shows up, knowing there are no consequences...
*shudder* / *ominous music* / *Nataliya keeps her light on at night to avoid nightmares*
----------------------
Ok, enough about the story. 1 star rating for lazy writing and lazy rhyming. Apparently, the author spent months coming up with a long poem that is almost fully monosyllabic. Here is the issue. If children are old enough to read this long poem by themselves, they should be able to read more than a syllable at a time. I know I did. Let's not be condescending to kids - they are capable of a lot if we give them the benefit of the doubt.
Now, rhyming. I guess you run out of words quickly if you are limited to single syllables but still need to maintain the poetry rhythm. Still, it's not a justification for pathetic excuse of lines that go "Cold, cold wet day", "Sit! Sit! Sit! Sit!", "We sat there we two", "The sun is not sunny", "Fun that is funny", "So so so..." That is just lazy. Just because the story is for kids does not mean it's okay for the writing to be subpar.
The story has enough exclamation points to drive you mad. "And then something went BUMP! How that bump made us jump! We looked! Then we saw him step in on the mat! We looked! And we saw him! The Cat in the Hat!"
To quote (and take slightly out of context) the great Terry Pratchett,
Yeah. Not a fan of this one. Maybe it's because I am a few decades past the target audience. Maybe it's because the book scares the bejeezus out of me. 2 stars total for the horror potential (which is higher than my initial 1-star rating, so yay?). Sorry, kids.

(Well, there actually is nothing scary about that last one. That still doesn't make it any less of a nightmare.)
Sometimes I have nightmares where everything goes wrong, but I am helpless to do anything about it. What's worse, the voice of reason is gone. Well, that pretty much sums up the plot of this book. As a horror story, it gets solid 3 stars. Quick, somebody call Stephen King!
Two kids are left alone on a dreary rainy day - which by the way is a perfect setting for a horror story. (Sidenote: I am not that outraged with the mother leaving the kids unsupervised. In Eastern Europe parents do it all the time. And we survived ). Suddenly a stranger barges in and insists that the kids join him in his games (*cue ominous music here*). And he refuses to leave.
Yeah, if this creature barged into my house, I'd be curled up in a ball in a corner, wailing and wetting myself.

The sentient fish, who appears to supervise the kids and is the sole voice of sanity here, sensibly protests (He should not be here. He should not be about. He should not be here When your mother is out!) - and immediately gets physically threatened and abused. Terrified, it demands the abuse to stop - "This is no fun at all! Put me down! [...] I do NOT wish to fall!" - and narrowly avoids death. Hilarious, right?
Not to mention that, for a fish, seeing a cat is like you answering the doorbell just to greet a Grim Reaper.

Next, the terrifying delinquent Cat unleashes Things (perfect name for horror creatures) who wreck havoc on the house. Then the Cat cleans up and vanishes. Basically there is zero evidence left of this horrific intrusion even if the kids tried to tell. But likely the poor little victims will keep quiet. And who knows what will happen the next time the Cat shows up, knowing there are no consequences...
*shudder* / *ominous music* / *Nataliya keeps her light on at night to avoid nightmares*
"Should we tell her The things that went on there that day?"YES. YOU SHOULD, KIDS. ALWAYS. PLEASE DO TELL YOUR PARENTS!
----------------------
Ok, enough about the story. 1 star rating for lazy writing and lazy rhyming. Apparently, the author spent months coming up with a long poem that is almost fully monosyllabic. Here is the issue. If children are old enough to read this long poem by themselves, they should be able to read more than a syllable at a time. I know I did. Let's not be condescending to kids - they are capable of a lot if we give them the benefit of the doubt.
Now, rhyming. I guess you run out of words quickly if you are limited to single syllables but still need to maintain the poetry rhythm. Still, it's not a justification for pathetic excuse of lines that go "Cold, cold wet day", "Sit! Sit! Sit! Sit!", "We sat there we two", "The sun is not sunny", "Fun that is funny", "So so so..." That is just lazy. Just because the story is for kids does not mean it's okay for the writing to be subpar.
The story has enough exclamation points to drive you mad. "And then something went BUMP! How that bump made us jump! We looked! Then we saw him step in on the mat! We looked! And we saw him! The Cat in the Hat!"
To quote (and take slightly out of context) the great Terry Pratchett,
"Multiple exclamation marks are a sure sign of a diseased mind."---------------------------------
Yeah. Not a fan of this one. Maybe it's because I am a few decades past the target audience. Maybe it's because the book scares the bejeezus out of me. 2 stars total for the horror potential (which is higher than my initial 1-star rating, so yay?). Sorry, kids.
Sign into 카지노싸이트 to see if any of your friends have read
The Cat in the Hat.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Finished Reading
May 2, 2010
– Shelved
Comments Showing 1-50 of 168 (168 new)
message 1:
by
Nataliya
(new)
-
rated it 2 stars
Mar 19, 2012 10:39PM

reply
|
flag


:D
p.s. I can't believe I just replied with an emoticon. What would my mother say....

A fixture of my unhappy childhood compared to Chucky and Edward Glittershanks! The horror, the horror!

I have, as my mom would say, a serious case of verbal diarrhea. And an unhealthy love for Terry Pratchett quotes. That's all :)

It's a hatchet wrapped up in terrycloth, used by stand-up comics doing pratfalls on stage. The terrycloth is so that they don't hurt themselves if they happen to pratfall on top of the hatchet.


Re: Footnotes. See also: Susanna Clarke.


Sounds like a snazzy robe that you lounge about the house in."
Something Victoria's-Secret-y. Unwholesome.

This. Is. Awesome. (*)
* I want that Snuggie. Dear Santa, pretty please?

"Night Watch" and "Hogfather" are my favorites. But the text from any of Granny Weatherwax books will do!

But it's not like any of them would be a bad choice.


Thanks, Wendy!
Brandi wrote: "Interesting take on a children's classic. I can't remember reading the book, but I remember nodding off during the movie. It was way too crazy for me.
I've noticed that a lot of children's books a..."
That's right. Children love a healthy dose of scary. Brothers' Grimm fairy tales immediately come to mind - they are rather cruel and bloody, but the kids love them. I think it's the clear division between good and evil and the fact that the evil always gets brutally punished, combined with children's sense of invulnerability that makes all those horrific for adults stories so much fun for children. (I, for instance, loved reading horror stories as a pre-teen and in my early teen years because, I think, I could never imagine that any of the scary things could actually happen to me. I was immune to the danger!)
I decided to look at this book through the eyes of a horrified adult (and had quite a bit of fun doing that) - but had I been a kid, I probably would have loved this book to pieces. Like Wendy said - "in my experience children love a little zing of scariness".

Maybe you should try Mog, The Forgetful Cat - he starts out cute and stays cute!!
This scared me as a kid, and, as a result, I never subjected my daughter to any Dr. Seuss when she was a kid. Great review. :)

I kinda want that now. The cover is definitely memorable :)
Jeannette wrote: "This scared me as a kid, and, as a result, I never subjected my daughter to any Dr. Seuss when she was a kid. Great review. :)"
Thanks, Jeannette!
Ronyell wrote: "Awesome review Nataliya! I love the images!! How do you get the images to line up like that?"
Thanks, Ronyell! I just put html codes for images right next to each other, and I make sure to specify their widths so that they do not spill over to the new line.
Now I mostly mash them up together in a word processor, then make a jpg file and upload that.

I kinda want that now. The cover is definitely memorable :)
Jeannette wrote: "This scared me as a kid, and, as a result, I nev..."
That's awesome!!! I'll have to try that in my reviews!

I do hope they read a children's book that is better crafted than this one (I, for instance, would suggest Pushkin and like because it's never too early to start developing good taste). All I know is that the popularity of books by Dr. Seuss baffles me. Terrible and sloppy writing is not okay - and I stick by that opinion. And I love having fun when writing reviews.


I'm glad to meet another early reader here - I was taught to read when I was 3, and because of that I was allowed to skip our kindergarten alphabet lessons. I chose to spend that time reading my books while everyone else was learning what letter 'A' looked like. Good times :)


Thanks, Linda! Yes, poor victimized fish... that poor creature will be in need of some serious counseling in the future ;)

Keep in mind, this was ground-breaking work in children's 'primers', basically written on a challenge that there were not enough books for schools that everyday children could not put down, with a short list of very-beginning-reader words.

Keep in mind, this was ground-breaking work in children's 'primers', basically written on a ch..."
Is that what it was - the beginner words? Interesting, and accounts for what I thought was poor writing (how much can you really achieve with very simple words?)
As a side thought - I as always wondering how difficult it was for kids to learn reading in English, given how many words are spelled very differently from what they re phonetically ('daughter', for example, would have been a nightmare to figure out how to spell). I assume that the approach to reading for English-speaking children would have been more visual than anything - remembering what the words look like and then learning to recognize them before moving on to just being able to read. I learned to read in Russian, and I remember it being as simple as just learning the sounds of each letter and then stringing them together since Russian spelling is way more phonetic than English. Therefore there would be less of a need for very simple and short words, I'd presume.
==============
Brandon wrote: "You had me at "sentient fish"."
*curtsies*