The Autistic Book Club discussion

This topic is about
Lessons in Chemistry
Thoughts on 'Lessons in Chemistry'
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Autistic Book Club Admin
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Jan 07, 2024 01:58PM

reply
|
flag






I am intrigued to read about how the author has written about Christianity and am looking forward to discussing it. However, from how she describes her father, he's not actually a religious person, he's just using Christianity to con vulnerable ppl and to control / abuse his family. As she says, he wanted to be an actor but had no talent, so 'took his fake smile to revival tents' to sell the end of the world...
...at least that's what it sounds like from where I've read up to!

I loved this book, the two main characters were obviously Autistic as was the daughter and I found all of them highly relatable.
It made me cry, it was deeply emotional and I loved the exploration of grief and the unacceptability of 'those who grieve' within western society.
The extensive examination of the childhood horror of having to create a 'family tree' for your teacher was extremely validating. (If you're reading this and you teach, please consider not doing the 'family tree' with your students; it is traumatising to those of us without a conventional family!)
The author is not a fan of Christianity. Bonnie's Christian characters are a distressingly awful bunch, only one seemed reasonable. As other reviews have mentioned, Bonnie does seem to have a strong anti-faith stance, and depicts those who believe as fools or worse, which is a shame. As an Autistic Christian who was raised by Atheists and came to Christianity later in life, we're not all monsters!
Does anyone have any views they'd like to share?

When I started reading, I thought it was going to be a bit ‘twee’ for my tastes but it did grow on me a lot, so I’m glad I persisted with it.
The main theme I took away from it was feminism and just how far we have come since the 1950s/60s, though there are still many issues of course. The discrimination and patronising behaviour towards women is really striking and uncomfortable to read.
I didn’t really pick up on the main characters being neurodivergent, I just thought they were quirky, maybe because the main character in particular is very confident and deals with people efficiently. It’s certainly true that she is a very unusual and interesting character, however you interpret it. I think my favourite character was the dog.
The book was semi-realistic as in the settings were portrayed as real but some of the events strayed into the realm of fantasy. I wonder if people like this mixture?
I enjoyed the book and found it quite original and also funny. The ending was perhaps a bit disappointing as it seemed rather conventional compared to the rest of the story. Hope you enjoy reading it.

When I started reading, I thought it was going to be a bit ‘twee’ for my tastes bu..."
I thought it would be 'twee' too, but was pleasantly surprised, I'm glad you liked it!

