La Petite Américaine's Reviews > The Book Thief

The Book Thief by Markus Zusak
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
59329
's review

did not like it
bookshelves: worst-garbage-i-ve-ever-read, sucked, i-want-my-money-back, rants

** spoiler alert ** UPDATE: AUG 26, 2016: This review has been here 8 years, has 18 pages of 854 comments and 764 likes. There's no outrage for you to add in the comments section that hasn't already been addressed.
If you want to talk about the book, or why you liked it, or anything else, feel free.

UPDATE: FEB 17, 2014: I wrote this review 4 years ago on a foreign keyboad, so I'm well aware that I spelled Chekhov's name wrong. I'm not going to fix it, so please don't drive my review further up in the rankings by commenting on the misspelling. You're very dear, but I know his name is Anton and not Antonin. On that same note, you don't need to add comments telling me that I didn't like the book because I "don't know how to read" and "don't understand metaphors." I actually have an M.A. in in English Lit, so I do know how to read -- much better than you do, in fact. Now quit bothering me before I go get my PhD and then really turn into a credential-touting ass.

UPDATE: JULY 10, 2013: To all jr. high students who find themselves grossly offended by my review: please remember that every time you leave a comment here, you push my review up even higher in the rankings. Please save us both time and energy by not commenting. Thnx.

This was the biggest piece of garbage I've ever read after The Kite Runner. Just as with The Kite Runner, I'm (somewhat) shocked that this book is a bestseller and has been given awards, chewed up and swallowed by the literary masses and regarded as greatness. Riiiight.

The whole thing can be summed up as the story of a girl who sometimes steals books coming of age during the Holocaust. Throw in the snarky narration by Death (nifty trick except that it doesn't work), a few half-assed drawings of birdies and swastikas, senseless and often laughable prose that sounds like it was pulled from the "poetry" journal of a self-important 15 year-old, and a cast of characters that throughout are like watching cardboard cutouts walking around VERY SLOWLY, and that's the novel.

Here are some humble observations.

First, chances are that you, Mr. Zusak, are not Antonin Chekhov. You are, therefore, incapable of properly describing the weather for use as a literary device, and you end up sounding like an asshole. Don't believe me?

"I like a chocolate-colored sky. Dark, dark chocolate." Really? Do you, now?

"The sky was dripping. Like a tap that a child has tried it’s hardest to turn off but hasn’t quite managed.” Really?? Wow. Next you'll tell me that the rain was like a shower. I'm moved.

"Oh, how the clouds stumbled in and assembled stupidly in the sky. Great obese clouds." Yes. Stupid, obese clouds! They need an education and a healthy diet!

Next, chances are that you, Mr. Zusak, are not William Styron or any one of the other small handful of authors that can get away with Holocaust fiction. They've done their research, had some inkling of writing ability, and were able to tell fascinating stories. You invented a fake town in Germany (probably so you didn't have to do any research) and told a long-winded and poorly-written story, and in 500+ pages you couldn't even make it to 1945, so you sloppily dropped off and wrapped it up in 1943. What's the point of writing historical fiction if you can't even stay within the basic confines of that hisotrical event? For me, this does nothing more than trivialize the mass murder of over 6 million people. Maybe that's why a 30 year-old Australian shouldn't write about the Holocaust. But that's just me. Moving on.

But what really makes this book expensive toilet paper is the bad writing which is to be found not just in bizarre descriptions of the weather, but really on every page. Some personal favorites?

"The breakfast colored sun."

"Somewhere inside her were the souls of words."

"The oldened young man." WTF?!!?

"He crawled to a disfigured figure."

"Her words were motionless."

"It smelled like friendship." (Remind me to sniff my friends next time I see them.)

"A multitude of words and sentences were at her fingertips." (HUH?)

"Pinecones littered the ground like cookies."

Sigh.

All of this is quite funny coming from a book where the main character supposedly learns the importance of words. Further, I love that the protagonist comes to the conclusion that Hitler "would be nothing without words." Really? REALLY? Would Hitler be nothing without WORDS? What about self-loathing, misplaced blame and hatred, an ideology, xenophobia, charisma, an army, and a pride-injured nation willing to listen? Don't those count for something??

The shit-storm comes to an end when a bomb lands on our fictional town, wiping out everyone save for the sometimes book-thief main character. Of course. Because weak writers who don't know how to end their story just kill everyone off for a clean break and some nice emotional manipulation. Written for maximum tear-jerking effect, our main character spews out some great lines when she sees the death and destruction around her:

To her dead mother, "God damn it, you were so beautiful."

To her dead best friend as she shakes him, "Wake up! I love you! Wake up!" (Didn't I see the same thing in that movie My Girl?)

Then she profoundly notes that her dead father "...was a man with silver eyes, not dead ones."

And this kind of angsty adolescent prose just never ended! It went on and on to form the one long-ass, senseless, disjointed story.

But that's ok. Take it all the junk, give it a quirky narrator, an obscure and mysterious title, throw in a Jew on the run from Nazis who likes to draw silly pictures of birds and swastikas, and market it all as Holocaust lit. Ahh, the packaging of bullshit makes for such a sweet best seller.

Swallow it down, America. Put it on the shelf next to The Kite Runner. You love this. You live for this.

SUCKED.
1711 likes · flag

Sign into 카지노싸이트 to see if any of your friends have read The Book Thief.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

July 24, 2008 – Shelved
May 11, 2010 – Started Reading
May 12, 2010 – Shelved as: worst-garbage-i-ve-ever-read
May 12, 2010 – Shelved as: sucked
May 12, 2010 – Shelved as: i-want-my-money-back
May 12, 2010 – Finished Reading
March 21, 2012 – Shelved as: rants

Comments Showing 301-350 of 1,263 (1263 new)


message 301: by La Petite Américaine (last edited Dec 19, 2013 06:35PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

La Petite Américaine Liz wrote: "You just proved the point of The book thief, that words are more hateful and damaging. Like Hitler you are trying to convince the masses that this is a bad and poorly written book. Breakfast colore..."

Wow, I've been called a lot of things because of my goodreads rants, but never have I been compared to Hitler.

This must set some kind of goodreads record.

As for writing a bestseller of my own, dear, if you read crap on the Internet...chances are I'm the one who got paid to write it. So, not only did you read my review -- which in itself was powerful enough to get you to write a passionate, typo-ridden response -- but you've probably read tons of my ghostwriting online and most likely loved it.

Isn't that just aggravating?? :)


message 302: by Ujala (new) - rated it 1 star

Ujala One of the worst books I've ever tried to read.


message 304: by Pierre (new) - rated it 3 stars

Pierre Fortier Megan, I don't think this is appropriate place for that.


La Petite Américaine Huh? She's quoting my review. Don't follow...


message 306: by Auds (new) - rated it 3 stars

Auds I personally like this book so far, but this review had me laughing out loud


message 307: by Lucy (new) - rated it 1 star

Lucy preach. im so enraged that this is best-seller/film/that i got this as a present and contributed more money


La Petite Américaine From /user/show/2... in my inbox: "you are a bitch!
message: stop being so hateful and if you think you're so good to be writing better than most authors then be my guest.. Don't just talk shit but actually do something to fix our supposedly tainted &faulty fiction genre in America"

Don't assume your correspondence w/me is ever confidential.


Gabrielle Joella Your review did give me more to think about this book and though i disagree with you and i think this book this great, your review has made me think deeper about this book and also the author of this book. You have given quotes as ur evidence but you didnt explain why those quotes back up ur reasoning for why you hate this book so much, u just gave quotes from the book, explain urself a little more when u give those quotes please so i can fully understand why those quotes make u hate the book so much.


La Petite Américaine Gabrielle wrote: "Your review did give me more to think about this book and though i disagree with you and i think this book this great, your review has made me think deeper about this book and also the author of th..."

Bad writing usually speaks for itself. It does in this case.


message 311: by A (new) - rated it 5 stars

A La Petite Américaine wrote: "From /user/show/2... in my inbox: "you are a bitch!
message: stop being so hateful and if you think you're so good to be writing better than most authors..."


Goodness, I don't understand why some readers get so spiteful when someone criticises their favourite books. People have different opinions and taste, why can't they accept that not everyone is going to love all the best selling books out there? Besides, I don't find anything wrong in analysing and writing a straight forward review based on your opinions over any book. Gosh, those people haven't ever heard of the term literary criticism.


La Petite Américaine Ayesha wrote: "La Petite Américaine wrote: "From /user/show/2... in my inbox: "you are a bitch!
message: stop being so hateful and if you think you're so good to be wri..."


Agreed.


message 313: by Rachel (new) - rated it 5 stars

Rachel Brown Well, considering this review is practically ancient I doubt if you will even see this comment but if you do I hope you can look past your lack in manners and seriously consider what I have to say. First of all the way you reguard adolescents is appealing. No one deserves to feel like their opinion is a waste of time. It's quite obvious that you feel your's holds some kind of godly importance. Your condescending tone made me (one of those junior highers) lose a little less hope in all of humanity. This book happens to be my favorite and I found your quotes to be insubstantial of proving the uselessness of the book. Zusak uses frazes like these throughout the book to symbolize that human thoughts are not always clear or easily understood. The book centers around the tendencies of man and how even though they may seem silly or fickle, we all share them. The characters are not ill-developed- half of them are children! Zusak revels in their simplicity and uses that in a way that is applicable to everyone. This book makes the holocaust personal as you shed a tear into the pages as a character is lost. It transforms the holocaust from a massive genocide to something that you could have been involved with. It pulls at your heart as you grow up with them, stand by their side, and cry the same tears as they. This book is not poorely written and is definitely not a waste of time unless you are in incapable of looking past the written words and into the meaning. I hope you fo not view this comment as disrespect but that you will learn to be a little kinder and considerate in what you write on this website. Thank you :)


La Petite Américaine Rachel wrote: "Well, considering this review is practically ancient I doubt if you will even see this comment but if you do I hope you can look past your lack in manners and seriously consider what I have to say...."

I can't begin to argue with to because I don't have the time to take on the numerous spelling / grammar / vocabulary mistakes.

I will say though: please don't tell me how to review a book or how to express my opinions. You're on a public forum, and you don't get to dictate the rules of conduct just because someone trashed a (crappy) book that you liked.


message 315: by Sarah (new) - rated it 5 stars

Sarah M. I can see where you are coming from, although I am completely on the other end of the spectrum, at least you're honest!


message 316: by Stella (new) - rated it 5 stars

Stella King I understand that you may hate this book and I accept that, but you are only looking at the bad parts of the book and not the good ones. Yes, there were some bad parts of the book, but there were plenty of good ones as well. That's just my opinion, though.


message 317: by 6138 (new) - rated it 1 star

6138 Stella wrote: "I understand that you may hate this book and I accept that, but you are only looking at the bad parts of the book and not the good ones. Yes, there were some bad parts of the book, but there were p..."

I agree with you Stella.

For example in the very last page, the part that reads "The End" was magnificent!

sorry but It's really the only good part I remember...


La Petite Américaine 6138 wrote: "Stella wrote: "I understand that you may hate this book and I accept that, but you are only looking at the bad parts of the book and not the good ones. Yes, there were some bad parts of the book, b..."
Lol!


message 319: by Veru (new) - added it

Veru @La Petite Américaine

I have to say I was initially outraged when I started reading your review. I listened to the audio book version, and I thought it was one of the most beautifully written books I've heard in a long time! I instantly became a huge Markus Zusak fan.

However, you made your case. I was laughing by the time I reached the end of your review. Now I'm tempted to borrow the book from the library, so I can see for myself what sounded so good in the audio book that probably doesn't look so good in print. I blame my oversight on the narrator, Allan Corduner. ;)


La Petite Américaine Interesting. I don't listen to audio books because I don't like being read to. If you end up disliking the book, it will have me wondering if audiobooks are more about performance than the literary merit of a book.


message 321: by Veru (new) - added it

Veru I'll let you know if I get to it. (So little time, so much to read!)

I usually listen to audio books in the car or while doing chores. It allows me to be more adventurous in terms of reading novels by authors I've never heard of before.

I would say it has a lot to do with performance. Some narrators, especially those with acting backgrounds, make the stories come alive for me. English is my second language, so I get a lot of enjoyment from listening to different English accents. They make the setting and people more real, so to speak.


La Petite Américaine Interesting. I know a lot of people who listen to books for commuting/housework/improving their English.

I tend to space out if people are reading to me, even if they're talented performers.

Do follow up. I'd be interested to know how you feel about the book in written form--even if you like it. ;)


message 323: by Veru (new) - added it

Veru I do space out a lot, too, actually or I'm just plain distracted. :D

Will do!


message 324: by Maryanna (new) - added it

Maryanna Pappas I'm seeing a few comments where users are getting angry over your review, saying something along the lines of "now people won't read the book, and they might have enjoyed it"
Isn't that the point of reviews? To let others know your opinion? And what about the people that would not have enjoyed it? Did he just not save them from reading something they might put on their worst books I've ever read shelf, right next to twilight?
I enjoy a good critical review. I'm getting tired of the "omg this book was like so amazing all my friends love it lol" type of reviews. Thank you for this review. I'll go find a book THAT I WILL MOST LIKELY ENJOY MORE thanks to you.


message 325: by La Petite Américaine (last edited Apr 25, 2014 09:40PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

La Petite Américaine "Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect." --Mark Twain

Thanks for the comment, Anna.


message 326: by [deleted user] (new)

I do wonder why (and how) you finished it, if you loathed it so much. Then again, I'm so impatient these days it's a wonder I finish anything at all. ;) I rather liked this book, but you have more patience (er, masochistic tendencies?) than I do.


La Petite Américaine I read the book when I was still living in Europe. Finishing it was a combination of a financial choice (books were an expensive indulgence there so I felt guilty not finishing them) and my own stubborn determination to finish what I start.


Amelia_bunny La Petite Américaine, whatever, your review is lame.


La Petite Américaine "Lame" is not what the rankings on my review would indicate.

Ass.


kendall1995 Korengold While reading this, I found myself crossing out multiple paragraphs...it's not organized very well and as a person who has lost a family member in the holocaust...I laughed throughout this book. Which is terrible in some cases. His research was minimal and the literary devices made no sense. I spent time analyzing them...and it made absolutely no sense. "Death" the pain in the ass narrator contradicted himself A LOT and the itty bitty philosophical aspect of it just further confused me. I closed the book thinking I'm either very dumb and don't understand this or need to analyze these senseless words further


La Petite Américaine MuddySparkles wrote: "While reading this, I found myself crossing out multiple paragraphs...it's not organized very well and as a person who has lost a family member in the holocaust...I laughed throughout this book. Wh..."
There's nothing to analyze. "Pinecones littered the ground like cookies." I mean...what the?...how the hell...?

It's just bad bad bad writing.

There are so many ways for young people to learn about the Holocaust. This book isn't one of them.


message 332: by Zo (new) - added it

Zo Mo Dear LA petite americaine

How on earth you didn't like this jewel this master piece, this modern classic. You should be ashamed of your inability to detect the genius of the man.



Sorry just kidding

I totally agree with you, the book is a bunch of twisted phrases and tons and tons of sentimentality cramped between its covers.
Two stars for the book
Five stars for your review


message 334: by Molly (new) - rated it 5 stars

Molly I'm not going to get into the argument. I don't agree with what you've said but that doesn't matter it's your own opinion.
that being said however you may want to edit a small part of your review. The author did not make up a town, Munich is the birthplace of Nazism, where Hitler started his campaign, wrote Mein Kampf etc.


message 335: by Molly (new) - rated it 5 stars

Molly whoops I apologize for that comment. somehow I was thinking Munich not Molching, which is fictional though set right outside Munich


La Petite Américaine Yes, from what I read, Molching is a fictional town meant to be set outside of Munich


Patrick Haha, thats pretty funny and harsh, but I'd still give it a 5, cause the author explains all his funny verbal mistakes and letting the characters in the book rather explain. And to be honest, the words were all pretty humorous. The book is indeed fiction, even if there are fake places, but I think the book is still good with the story. Don't be too harsh on fellow Markus :P


Anthony Marchetta I've said this before, but because it came up: Molly, you're more right than you think. Molching is fictional. Olching, Germany, twelve miles out from Munich, is real. It is a predominantly working class town, and 22 people there were killed in an allied bombing raid in 1942.

Nothing to really add. I just find that interesting for whatever reason.


message 339: by Peter (new) - rated it 3 stars

Peter Xiao La Petite Américaine wrote: ""Lame" is not what the rankings on my review would indicate.

Ass."


lol your smart


message 340: by Hollie (new) - added it

Hollie I'm about half way through this book and it's like a love hate relationship.
I don't hate the story but some of the things you pointed out that are awful,like some of the use of description etc, (and I'm not saying you're in the wrong for doing so) are SO true!

PS- some people on here really don't know how to let other express their opinions freely! Hah


message 341: by Olga (new) - rated it 3 stars

Olga Tsvietkova Totally agree with your review.


Kristina Coop-a-Loop laughable prose that sounds like it was pulled from the "poetry" journal of a self-important 15 year-old: thank you for perfectly describing the writing style. I just read the "obese clouds" sentences and thought: wtf? You've definitely captured all of my problems with this novel so far (I'm only 100 pages in--may not finish it).


Kristina Coop-a-Loop La Petite Américaine wrote: "Fucking piece of shit garbage novel. It's going to take me like two months to get the rage for this book out of my system."

This review is merciless and excellent. I particularly like this comment because it's exactly how I felt after reading John Green's piece of shit The Fault in Our Stars. I thought my head was going to explode while reading it because it's so godawful bad but everyone loves it.


message 344: by A (new) - rated it 5 stars

A Kristina wrote: "I particularly like this comment because it's exactly how I felt after reading John Green's piece of shit The Fault in Our Stars. I thought my head was going to explode while reading it because it's so godawful bad but everyone loves it."

FINALLY! SOMEONE ELSE WHO HATES THE FAULT IN OUR STARS!


message 345: by Kristina (last edited Jan 29, 2014 08:46AM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Kristina Coop-a-Loop Ayesha wrote: "Kristina wrote: "I particularly like this comment because it's exactly how I felt after reading John Green's piece of shit The Fault in Our Stars. I thought my head was going to explode while readi..."

I detested TFIOS. I read it months ago and I'm still irritated. Whenever I enter my local bookstore and see the big John Green display with all his crappy books I gnash my teeth and wail.


message 346: by A (new) - rated it 5 stars

A TFIOS is the worst book that I ever read.


Kristina Coop-a-Loop Petite--I have waded thru many of the comments about the review of this book and two things:
1. I think I love you
2. I thought I had troll problems. Wow. My congratulations to you for being so...patient? Hmm...maybe not that...responding with such witty snarkiness? Yes, that's it.


Kristina Coop-a-Loop Ayesha wrote: "TFIOS is the worst book that I ever read."

The last time I was that enraged by a book was when I read a memoir called Perfection by Julie ? Metz. To keep track of the really awful passages I marked them with post-it notes that generally said: "I fucking hate you Julie Metz. I hate you so fucking much."
Ha.


La Petite Américaine Ayesha and Kristina: I am officially in love with both of you.


Kristina Coop-a-Loop La Petite Américaine wrote: "Ayesha and Kristina: I am officially in love with both of you."

Ha. Who says there's no love on the internet?


back to top