La Petite Américaine's Reviews > The Book Thief

The Book Thief by Markus Zusak
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
59329
's review

did not like it
bookshelves: worst-garbage-i-ve-ever-read, sucked, i-want-my-money-back, rants

** spoiler alert ** UPDATE: AUG 26, 2016: This review has been here 8 years, has 18 pages of 854 comments and 764 likes. There's no outrage for you to add in the comments section that hasn't already been addressed.
If you want to talk about the book, or why you liked it, or anything else, feel free.

UPDATE: FEB 17, 2014: I wrote this review 4 years ago on a foreign keyboad, so I'm well aware that I spelled Chekhov's name wrong. I'm not going to fix it, so please don't drive my review further up in the rankings by commenting on the misspelling. You're very dear, but I know his name is Anton and not Antonin. On that same note, you don't need to add comments telling me that I didn't like the book because I "don't know how to read" and "don't understand metaphors." I actually have an M.A. in in English Lit, so I do know how to read -- much better than you do, in fact. Now quit bothering me before I go get my PhD and then really turn into a credential-touting ass.

UPDATE: JULY 10, 2013: To all jr. high students who find themselves grossly offended by my review: please remember that every time you leave a comment here, you push my review up even higher in the rankings. Please save us both time and energy by not commenting. Thnx.

This was the biggest piece of garbage I've ever read after The Kite Runner. Just as with The Kite Runner, I'm (somewhat) shocked that this book is a bestseller and has been given awards, chewed up and swallowed by the literary masses and regarded as greatness. Riiiight.

The whole thing can be summed up as the story of a girl who sometimes steals books coming of age during the Holocaust. Throw in the snarky narration by Death (nifty trick except that it doesn't work), a few half-assed drawings of birdies and swastikas, senseless and often laughable prose that sounds like it was pulled from the "poetry" journal of a self-important 15 year-old, and a cast of characters that throughout are like watching cardboard cutouts walking around VERY SLOWLY, and that's the novel.

Here are some humble observations.

First, chances are that you, Mr. Zusak, are not Antonin Chekhov. You are, therefore, incapable of properly describing the weather for use as a literary device, and you end up sounding like an asshole. Don't believe me?

"I like a chocolate-colored sky. Dark, dark chocolate." Really? Do you, now?

"The sky was dripping. Like a tap that a child has tried it’s hardest to turn off but hasn’t quite managed.” Really?? Wow. Next you'll tell me that the rain was like a shower. I'm moved.

"Oh, how the clouds stumbled in and assembled stupidly in the sky. Great obese clouds." Yes. Stupid, obese clouds! They need an education and a healthy diet!

Next, chances are that you, Mr. Zusak, are not William Styron or any one of the other small handful of authors that can get away with Holocaust fiction. They've done their research, had some inkling of writing ability, and were able to tell fascinating stories. You invented a fake town in Germany (probably so you didn't have to do any research) and told a long-winded and poorly-written story, and in 500+ pages you couldn't even make it to 1945, so you sloppily dropped off and wrapped it up in 1943. What's the point of writing historical fiction if you can't even stay within the basic confines of that hisotrical event? For me, this does nothing more than trivialize the mass murder of over 6 million people. Maybe that's why a 30 year-old Australian shouldn't write about the Holocaust. But that's just me. Moving on.

But what really makes this book expensive toilet paper is the bad writing which is to be found not just in bizarre descriptions of the weather, but really on every page. Some personal favorites?

"The breakfast colored sun."

"Somewhere inside her were the souls of words."

"The oldened young man." WTF?!!?

"He crawled to a disfigured figure."

"Her words were motionless."

"It smelled like friendship." (Remind me to sniff my friends next time I see them.)

"A multitude of words and sentences were at her fingertips." (HUH?)

"Pinecones littered the ground like cookies."

Sigh.

All of this is quite funny coming from a book where the main character supposedly learns the importance of words. Further, I love that the protagonist comes to the conclusion that Hitler "would be nothing without words." Really? REALLY? Would Hitler be nothing without WORDS? What about self-loathing, misplaced blame and hatred, an ideology, xenophobia, charisma, an army, and a pride-injured nation willing to listen? Don't those count for something??

The shit-storm comes to an end when a bomb lands on our fictional town, wiping out everyone save for the sometimes book-thief main character. Of course. Because weak writers who don't know how to end their story just kill everyone off for a clean break and some nice emotional manipulation. Written for maximum tear-jerking effect, our main character spews out some great lines when she sees the death and destruction around her:

To her dead mother, "God damn it, you were so beautiful."

To her dead best friend as she shakes him, "Wake up! I love you! Wake up!" (Didn't I see the same thing in that movie My Girl?)

Then she profoundly notes that her dead father "...was a man with silver eyes, not dead ones."

And this kind of angsty adolescent prose just never ended! It went on and on to form the one long-ass, senseless, disjointed story.

But that's ok. Take it all the junk, give it a quirky narrator, an obscure and mysterious title, throw in a Jew on the run from Nazis who likes to draw silly pictures of birds and swastikas, and market it all as Holocaust lit. Ahh, the packaging of bullshit makes for such a sweet best seller.

Swallow it down, America. Put it on the shelf next to The Kite Runner. You love this. You live for this.

SUCKED.
1711 likes · flag

Sign into 카지노싸이트 to see if any of your friends have read The Book Thief.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

July 24, 2008 – Shelved
May 11, 2010 – Started Reading
May 12, 2010 – Shelved as: worst-garbage-i-ve-ever-read
May 12, 2010 – Shelved as: sucked
May 12, 2010 – Shelved as: i-want-my-money-back
May 12, 2010 – Finished Reading
March 21, 2012 – Shelved as: rants

Comments Showing 151-200 of 1,263 (1263 new)


message 151: by Elin (new) - rated it 3 stars

Elin Your review makes me tempted to read the Kite Runner next :) You are absolutely entitled to your opinion, but I just totally disagree. I think sometimes different people see different metaphors as either pretentious BS, or something they instinctively understand depending on their own thoughts and experiences. I get your review, because I too have a very low threshold for pretentious BS, for which reason I hated The Unbearable Smugness of Being; but I actually loved the simple but beautiful descriptions in this book. I understand 'smells like friendship' just like people commonly say 'smells like home' - same deal to me. I like 'Her words were motionless' - just another way of saying they were flat and monotone but in a more pleasing conceptual way. "A multitude of words and sentences were at her fingertips." - I thought this was a fairly well known metaphor, e.g. having xyz at your fingertips. With Liesel she just has lots of potential things to say which pop instantly to mind (and from that sentence you can see why Zusak chose to say it the way he did ;) ) To me, Zusak walks the line expertly between unoriginal writing which is just completely devoid of poetry, and pretentious nonsense where it feels like the writer is trying too hard to impress. I like that the book felt natural and unforced, light and casual. Like I said before - totally respect your opinion, I wonder if we have such different taste that it might be worth your reading the Unbearable Lightness of Being in case you love it! Meanwhile, I'm off to read The Kite Runner ;)


message 152: by Hannah (new) - added it

Hannah My suggestions for your next review of a book are:
1) Tone it down.
2) Swearing isn't required.
3) No matter how much you dislike a book, don't discourage others from reading it.

I understand that I am biased against your review because I very much enjoyed The Book Thief, but to make others feel bad for liking something and discouraging others from even giving it a chance seems wrong, don't you agree? Curiously, I went into this review hoping to keep an open mind and wanting to respect your opinion until you massacred everything about this book. Also I think it was unnecessary to bash Mr. Zusak for 'not doing his research' when I think it was evident that there was. The fictional town was obviously used to create an interesting story because the book is, you know, fictional (!), and all together it was completely disrespectful. All I ask is for you to review the book for what it is and not to put on a show. Thank you.


message 153: by La Petite Américaine (last edited Jun 28, 2013 04:29PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

La Petite Américaine Commenters like Hannah et. al. are precisely why I want to cancel my goodreads account. I can't deal with the constant inundation from idiots.

Fucking 7th grade Internet police. "You're review was disrespectful!" (No shit, really?), "your review needs to follow x,y,z guidelines set up by me next time" (um, no it doesn't), "insert-every-juvenile-emotional-non-argument-here" (ugh).

This is exactly why I take down the book, the author, and the audience in one fell swoop of a pissed off review.

I've got to figure out how to block comments from people who are still in jr. high, I can't stand any more 14 year-olds on my page...ughghghghg


message 154: by El (new) - rated it 3 stars

El Hannah wrote: "My suggestions for your next review of a book are:
1) Tone it down.
2) Swearing isn't required.
3) No matter how much you dislike a book, don't discourage others from reading it.

I understand th..."


Oh, Hannah. Did you join 카지노싸이트 just to comment this way on someone else's review? That's just sad.


message 155: by Martyn (last edited Jun 28, 2013 08:24PM) (new)

Martyn Hannah wrote: " I think it was unnecessary to bash Mr. Zusak for 'not doing his research' when I think it was evident that there was. "

Evidence please, after all you say it was evident from the text.

LPA has provided copious examples to back up her arguments, that's how intelligent adults put together reviews, no matter how caustic - now it's your turn. (If you want to be taken seriously).

Also if you truly like something no amount of bad reviews should prevent you from liking it - have some self confidence, or just go and read reviews that you wholly agree with. That may make you feel better.


La Petite Américaine Thank you, El and Marilyn. It's the claiming that the author does something and then not having supporting evidence that reveals the age of these annoying-ass commenters: in junior high, your opinion suffices. They're not capable of thinking critically and supporting their findings with the text. In short, they waste my time. I can't be bothered to argue with pre-teens, it's too irritating.


message 157: by Emily (new) - rated it 5 stars

Emily First of all, I'd like to respond to one of your criticisms. The phrase


La Petite Américaine Shhhhh. Quiet, child.


message 159: by Grace (new)

Grace What I didn't understand why was Death was so fascinated with Liesel he basically spent a couple years with her. I thought Death had better things to do, or are there multiple Deaths running around?


La Petite Américaine Grace wrote: "What I didn't understand why was Death was so fascinated with Liesel he basically spent a couple years with her. I thought Death had better things to do, or are there multiple Deaths running around?"

HAHAAH no kidding! If his whole existence was about stalking the living, wouldn't he have been more fascinated with others? Christ? Hitler? Leni Riefenstahl?

Or maybe Death just likes little girls... Goddamn pedophile.


Daniella your review wasn't funny, it was just hateful. sorry I can't take anyone seriously when they use terms such as "wtf" and "sucked" to berate a novel for its poor writing. and to anyone actually paying credence to this half wit review, please don't cheat yourselves out of reading a PHENOMENAL book.


La Petite Américaine @Daniella: I generally don't respond to people whose argument in favor of a book consists of attacking another person's opinions, followed by a one-word, all caps affirmation of said book's merits.

In any case, do you really take reviews on 카지노싸이트 seriously at all, even when they don't feature a "wtf" and "sucked"?

Sounds like you're the audience the author had in mind.


message 163: by Jules (new)

Jules Books often enrage me too so it's interesting to read your review and I personally appreciate your honesty. After all, where would this site be without the honesty factor? For me personally, I've yet to read this book. I have read some very poor reviews and other reviews that think the book is great. I imagine that this book will be one of my own (many) summer reads so I look forward to adding my opinions to the heated debate!


La Petite Américaine Just make sure you borrow the book from the library. You'll be pissed you spent money on it.


message 165: by Trish (new) - rated it 5 stars

Trish Noelle wrote: "First off, I've got to admit 3 things
1. this review was hilarious
2. I've never read this book
3. I still plan to read it

there's just 1 thing, in the quotes from the books that I feel like I nee..."


It means a morning sky, the kind of sky you see at breakfast time!


La Petite Américaine No, it doesn't. If that's what it meant, he would say "the breakfast-time colored sun." To say the sun is breakfast-colored means it is the color of your morning meal. What's on a breakfast plate that looks like the sun? The yoke of a sunny side up egg....except that's absurd.

Like I said. Horrific writing.


message 167: by Trish (new) - rated it 5 stars

Trish It's not meant to be literal it's poetical. Have a look at Under Milk Wood by Dylan Thomas


message 168: by Trish (new) - rated it 5 stars

Trish PS what books do you like to read?


La Petite Américaine I think we all assumed it was a metaphor. My point is that it was a shit metaphor.

What books do I like? I have a whole shelf dedicated to books I do like. I have a list of favorite authors on my profile. It's not that hard.


message 170: by Stephanie (new) - added it

Stephanie Gallagher I enjoyed this review, it saved me from making the mistake of reading the book. Besides, ANY book that is part of the Common Core garbage is better off in the garbage than on my bookshelf.


La Petite Américaine Saved another one


message 172: by Trish (new) - rated it 5 stars

Trish Oh you are very tiresome and rude. I shan't bother with you again. I was simply trying to have a conversation.


message 173: by Robert (new) - rated it 4 stars

Robert Lol. Tell us what you really think huh?
I haven't began reading this as of yet. I was curiously fanning through the various reviews and happened upon yours. Your review will not prevent me from reading this, but I did get a chuckle from it...so that's worth something. To each their own. Take Care.....


Christina Amazing how engaged some people get about book reviews. I love different oppnions and if l love a book and someone hates it Who cares?people need to get out more instead of being insulted by funny reviews.


message 176: by Andrew (new) - rated it 1 star

Andrew Laverick I agree with much of this review but take exception to the last sentence. Put it on the fire and don't take up valuable real estate on the shelf.


La Petite Américaine @Adam: Do you know what kind of person is more miserable than someone who writes a negative book review? The kind of person who comments on a 5 year-old review of said book on a Friday night. :)


message 178: by Adam (new) - rated it 3 stars

Adam Swain And what's to be said about the person who instantly responds on said friday night?

:)


message 179: by La Petite Américaine (last edited Jul 26, 2013 11:32PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

La Petite Américaine Comments are emailed to my smart phone, and I reply to them from there. Time it takes me? Two minutes while I'm sitting at a restaurant with friends. Time it takes to read my review, create a new goodreads account, and comment on my review? I'd wager half an hour, which screams sitting home at mom and dad's on a Friday night.

Since you're new to the site, let me explain how it works, and perhaps it will also deter those that are inept at thinking/getting a life/etc from posting here:

--My (kick ass and totally awesome) review is 5 years old. You're pissed off about old news.
--Every time you leave a comment here, it drives up the popularity of my review, making it one of the first that people see when they search this (godawful) novel on goodreads.
--When you leave a comment here, my review gets even more visibility because all of your friends and my friends on this site see the review.

So, the question is, who really benefits from the time you waste commenting here? Me, in the sense that I find your wrath mildly amusing. 카지노싸이트 in that they gain more traffic, another subscriber to boast about, and more revenue in the long term. You? Not likely. Bitching about how my review is just wrong wrong wrong is just shooting yourself in the foot. But please, be my guest and comment again....there's nothing quite so charming as someone who shoots himself in *both* feet in order to prove a point.


message 180: by Adam (new) - rated it 3 stars

Adam Swain Oh boy. Sorry not reading that. I'm just gonna walk away from this now because you are way too excited to get into a comment thread argument.


message 181: by Johnny (new) - rated it 5 stars

Johnny Lawless *sigh* Another reader who doesn't understand metaphors or ironic writing...


message 182: by Row (new) - rated it 3 stars

Row I think the problem here is that you've rated a young adult (and on the young end of that catagory) novel as an adult one. Young adult novels are written in order to speak to the youth, hence the "prose that sounds like it was pulled from the "poetry" journal of a self-important 15 year-old." The book gets three stars, your review is barely worthy of one.


message 183: by Archit (new)

Archit Nanda You write excellent reviews. I love them. I feel the same about this book. And I hated The Kite Runner. And I feel that nobody can write better than Chekhov. We both fuckin think alike. I just wish that I could write like you.


Michelle It was a very long book and I will admit that I stopped and started. But it didn't deserve the beating you just gave it. I know you said to not comment, but really, I am quite stubborn. I urge you to look for the deeper meaning in writing. Look at how the sun really does look like breakfast. How does breakfast make you feel, hopeful for a new day, content, full. The sun that day gave them hope for a contentment. Look deeper and if you really don't like a book that much, don't finish it


La Petite Américaine Michelle wrote: "Look at how the sun really does look like breakfast. How does breakfast make you feel"

Dude. Are you kidding me? Some warped version of reader-response theory type reading? As if a book is good if I "give it a chance" by exploring how it makes me feel? Are you joking?

I judge a book by the quality of the writing, not by its effect on my feelings -- unless you count the fact that this book made me "feel" like tossing it in the trash bin.

Just because it made you feel some inkling of emotion doesn't mean it's a good book. It means you need therapy.


La Petite Américaine Rowanne wrote: "The book gets three stars, your review is barely worthy of one."

Actually, it looks like my review is rated #2 out of 3,000 reviews, with 228 likes and 193 comments.

Can't argue with the numbers.


message 187: by Row (new) - rated it 3 stars

Row Comments don't reflect agreement.
Likes only reflect the boosted popularity of your review due to the comments.
Popularity does not connote correctitude.
I suggest that any perceived popularity of your review is due to the outrageous terms with which you expressed your disdain for the book. But all's fair.




La Petite Américaine K. Thanks for your input, it was charming. Can you be quiet now, I'm trying to work out. Thnx.


message 189: by Kayla (new) - rated it 5 stars

Kayla If you are looking for a book without any literary devices, motifs, or themes, you are probably best suited to be reading children's books. I would recommend "Goodnight Moon." That's probably about your level.


message 190: by Emma (new) - rated it 5 stars

Emma Hodges sounds like you could learn a little about critical reading. "critical" doesn't have to mean "tear the book apart until you find every last flaw, typo, and thing that doesn't make sense." It can also mean "think about what the author means by this and try to interpret it yourself." really, you sound pretty stupid making fun of those quotes because you didn't take the time to try and understand by letting them warm your cold, dead heart. I hope you can find a way to enjoy other moving and beautiful things in the world. Also, I'm not sure, but I've heard that sometimes authors are allowed to make stuff up when they are writing fiction. that is why it is called fiction.
anyway, I don't know what kind of person you are or if you were just having a bad day when you wrote that, but you're entitled to your opinion and it's okay to dislike a book, which I understand. but I hope you don't read every book you read the way you read this one.
sincerely,
a collection of atoms known as Emma


message 191: by Kristin (new) - added it

Kristin Ross you are probably one of the leasteducated people to write a review on here I've ever had the displeasure of reading. did you bother to do your OWN research of the book? It was real. Molching was a real town, as was Munich. are you going to tell me the Holocaust didn't happen either? i didn't enjoy it when he killed off the entire cast except for Liesel, but Death as the narrator? at least it wasn't absolute crap like Twilight.


Anthony Marchetta I mean, you're entitled to your opinion. This should be common sense, but if I don't say it, people will attack me.

But man, I could not disagree more. All I'm saying is, if you really think that this book is so bad, it's hard for me to respect you as a critical reader. You pull out quotes and talk about how bad they are. Okay. Why? All you said was "they're bad".

Even people who don't like the book should be able to realize its obvious literary merit. Apparently not, though. What can you say? I guess some people have extraordinarily different tastes.


message 193: by Yakub (new) - rated it 1 star

Yakub Medici You were unfair and nitpicky at parts, but this killed me. I forgot some of the stuff you mentioned. Knocked off two stars.


message 194: by Lacy (new)

Lacy Thomas I, for one, would like to thank you sincerely. I didn't read the book to which you referred, but I read another by the same author, and have been told all three are similar in makeup. I gave it one star and cannot for the life of me, understand how that book got such raving reviews. I was astonished and shocked. I could go on rambling, explaining my case, but really I just got on here to say thank you for saving me from putting myself through another tortuous book that is heart wrenching and depressing.


Anthony Marchetta Kristin wrote: "you are probably one of the leasteducated people to write a review on here I've ever had the displeasure of reading. did you bother to do your OWN research of the book? It was real. Molching was a ..."

Well, Molching wasn't QUITE a real town. It was BASED on the real town of Olching, Germany. It's located, like Molching, Northwest of Munich (about 12 miles away) and, like Molching, is mostly working class.

Most telling of all? In 1944 22 people were killed in an allied air raid.

My guess is that he figured that since he had a whole cast of fictional characters it would just be easier to put them in a fictional town than try to shoehorn them into a real one. But yeah, there's no doubt it's based on Olching, Germany.


message 196: by La Petite Américaine (last edited Sep 05, 2013 10:15PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

La Petite Américaine This comment is NOT directed at Bellomy. He's one of the few voices of dissent in this thread who actually has something interesting to offer (though I disagree with the value of the context in the comment below this one).

Doesn't my profile specifically say that if you're a junior high student pissed off that I ripped apart your favorite book, don't bother commenting as you'll only drive up my review's popularity?

Dear God, reading your asinine comments...this is precisely what's wrong with the education system in America. >shudder<

Now run along before your self-righteous juvenile banter gives me a migraine.


message 197: by Anthony (last edited Sep 05, 2013 10:06PM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Anthony Marchetta Point by point:

This was the biggest piece of garbage I've ever read after The Kite Runner. Just as with The Kite Runner, I'm (somewhat) shocked that this book is a bestseller and has been given awards, chewed up and swallowed by the literary masses and regarded as greatness. Riiiight.

Because you teach English 101, therefore you know better than eveeeeerybody else. Riiiiiight.

The whole thing can be summed up as the story of a girl who sometimes steals books coming of age during the Holocaust.

Right on.

Throw in the snarky narration by Death (nifty trick except that it doesn't work),

I totally disagree, the conversational way he spoke with the reader and the interesting interpretation Zusak gave made his narration fascinating.

a few half-assed drawings of birdies and swastikas,

The children's books were drawn thatt way to reflect the artist in the book, a Jewish fistfighter who had never painted before.


senseless and often laughable prose that sounds like it was pulled from the "poetry" journal of a self-important 15 year-old,

We'll get to that later.

and a cast of characters that throughout are like watching cardboard cutouts walking around VERY SLOWLY, and that's the novel.

Each character had an incredible amount of depth. I won't go into it, but we see both selfishness and selflessness from Rudy, a complex portrait of a Nazi neighbor, the Steiner family's attitude towards Jews, Max's conflicting feelings of cowardliness...and this just scratches the surface.

First, chances are that you, Mr. Zusak, are not Antonin Chekhov. You are, therefore, incapable of properly describing the weather for use as a literary device, and you end up sounding like an asshole. Don't believe me?

"I like a chocolate-colored sky. Dark, dark chocolate." Really? Do you, now?


Uh...yeah. That's a description, all right.

"The sky was dripping. Like a tap that a child has tried it’s hardest to turn off but hasn’t quite managed.” Really?? Wow. Next you'll tell me that the rain was like a shower. I'm moved.

He evoked an image to describe the rain. He's not trying to wow you with every sentence. It's just normal imagery, with a bit of a twist on the shower simile used often.

"Oh, how the clouds stumbled in and assembled stupidly in the sky. Great obese clouds." Yes. Stupid, obese clouds! They need an education and a healthy diet!

Personification is a thing. Large, fluffy clouds arranged randomly. Not rocket science.

(Skipping a bit)

You invented a fake town in Germany (probably so you didn't have to do any research)

Kind of. There's no Molching, but there is an Olching Germany. It's a working class town just North of Munich. In 1944 22 people were killed in an allied air raid. Also, he traveled down to Germany for first-hand research, and his acknowledgments mention many other sources.

and told a long-winded and poorly-written story, and in 500+ pages you couldn't even make it to 1945, so you sloppily dropped off and wrapped it up in 1943.

So, it was both long-winded AND ended too early. Got it.

(Skipping a bit)

"The breakfast colored sun."

Think eggs. Not difficult.

"Somewhere inside her were the souls of words."

A lovely sounding sentence that, for me, evoked how the words were used and what they accomplished. Each word has a soul in the sense that they all mean something depending on when and how they were made.

"The oldened young man." WTF?!!?

A young man that difficult life experience has forced to grow up and face the harshness of reality before most young people do. A sad sentence.

"He crawled to a disfigured figure."

I don't...see the problem? Yeah, he crawled to a disfigured figure.

"Her words were motionless."

A more creative way of saying "On the tip of her tongue", I guess.

"It smelled like friendship." (Remind me to sniff my friends next time I see them.)

I explained it earlier.

"A multitude of words and sentences were at her fingertips." (HUH?)

Uh, she was in a library.

"Pinecones littered the ground like cookies."

Explained earlier.

(Skipping a bit)

Further, I love that the protagonist comes to the conclusion that Hitler "would be nothing without words." Really? REALLY? Would Hitler be nothing without WORDS? What about self-loathing, misplaced blame and hatred, an ideology, xenophobia, charisma, an army, and a pride-injured nation willing to listen? Don't those count for something??

Wow, you clearly don't understand that phrase. Quite clearly what is meant there is that without the words the rest of that would mean nothing, as in, nothing could be accomplished. An astute observation.

The shit-storm comes to an end when a bomb lands on our fictional town, wiping out everyone save for the sometimes book-thief main character. Of course. Because weak writers who don't know how to end their story just kill everyone off for a clean break and some nice emotional manipulation.

That, or since it was the story of the people of Germany who didn't make the history books he wanted to explore what it was like for those Germans who survived the bombing raids supposedly done by "the good guys". But hey, your thing too.

Written for maximum tear-jerking effect, our main character spews out some great lines when she sees the death and destruction around her:

To her dead mother, "God damn it, you were so beautiful."


A touching callback to Rosa's speaking style, which was coarse to say the least.

To her dead best friend as she shakes him, "Wake up! I love you! Wake up!" (Didn't I see the same thing in that movie My Girl?)

Never seen that movie, but the dialogue felt quite realistic considering her relationship with Rudy before the bomb hit.

Then she profoundly notes that her dead father "...was a man with silver eyes, not dead ones.

Her father's eyes were a recurring motif, and pointing out that they're no longer what she expects them to be like, that they're dead, hammers home the impact of the moment.

And this kind of angsty adolescent prose just never ended! It went on and on to form the one long-ass, senseless, disjointed story.

Okay then, I disagree. I found the prose lovely and the story heartfelt.

But that's ok. Take it all the junk, give it a quirky narrator,

You mean a creative, well-written narrator.

an obscure and mysterious title,

You mean a good title.

throw in a Jew on the run from Nazis who likes to draw silly pictures of birds and swastikas,

Gross oversimplification.

and market it all as Holocaust lit.

It's really more WWII lit.

Ahh, the packaging of bullshit makes for such a sweet best seller.

And also since it's a great book, at least in my opinion.

Swallow it down, America. Put it on the shelf next to The Kite Runner. You love this. You live for this.

Never read the Kite Runner, so I can't judge.

But hey, I guess this was all stupid since you have credentials and I'm an idiot.

I'd love to discuss the book with you, I'm fine with disagreeing, but can you please not be a jerk? Please?


message 198: by La Petite Américaine (last edited Sep 05, 2013 10:14PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

La Petite Américaine Bellomy wrote: "I'd love to discuss the book with you, I'm fine with disagreeing, but can you please not be a jerk? Please? "

Check your goodreads inbox. I sent you a message.

I like what you have to say, and although I disagree with a majority of it, I'm impressed that you wrote this much in defense of the novel. You're definitely an English major. :)

Remember, my review was pointing out that the writing sucked: i.e., the breakfast colored sun. I know it's an egg. It's a shitty metaphor. I hated the writing, and that was the basis of my review; it's totally subjective.


message 199: by Steph (new) - rated it 5 stars

Steph You obviously don't know how to REALLY read a book.
When you read a book, it was not written for the purpose so that you could have a little line up of references in your head and tick them off as soon as you find something like it.
The whole PURPOSE of a novel is to lose yourself in the story. Every novel has its pitfalls, because the character's LIFE has them. I, personally found it difficult to keep track of what time it was because it kept jumping back and forward, but I just learnt to cope with it.

And, To put it bluntly, if you couldn't cope with this book, then why were you reading it? Or more importantly, why did you FINISH it?


message 200: by Steph (new) - rated it 5 stars

Steph ....


back to top