La Petite Américaine's Reviews > The Book Thief
The Book Thief
by
by

La Petite Américaine's review
bookshelves: worst-garbage-i-ve-ever-read, sucked, i-want-my-money-back, rants
Jul 24, 2008
bookshelves: worst-garbage-i-ve-ever-read, sucked, i-want-my-money-back, rants
** spoiler alert **
UPDATE: AUG 26, 2016: This review has been here 8 years, has 18 pages of 854 comments and 764 likes. There's no outrage for you to add in the comments section that hasn't already been addressed.
If you want to talk about the book, or why you liked it, or anything else, feel free.
UPDATE: FEB 17, 2014: I wrote this review 4 years ago on a foreign keyboad, so I'm well aware that I spelled Chekhov's name wrong. I'm not going to fix it, so please don't drive my review further up in the rankings by commenting on the misspelling. You're very dear, but I know his name is Anton and not Antonin. On that same note, you don't need to add comments telling me that I didn't like the book because I "don't know how to read" and "don't understand metaphors." I actually have an M.A. in in English Lit, so I do know how to read -- much better than you do, in fact. Now quit bothering me before I go get my PhD and then really turn into a credential-touting ass.
UPDATE: JULY 10, 2013: To all jr. high students who find themselves grossly offended by my review: please remember that every time you leave a comment here, you push my review up even higher in the rankings. Please save us both time and energy by not commenting. Thnx.
This was the biggest piece of garbage I've ever read after The Kite Runner. Just as with The Kite Runner, I'm (somewhat) shocked that this book is a bestseller and has been given awards, chewed up and swallowed by the literary masses and regarded as greatness. Riiiight.
The whole thing can be summed up as the story of a girl who sometimes steals books coming of age during the Holocaust. Throw in the snarky narration by Death (nifty trick except that it doesn't work), a few half-assed drawings of birdies and swastikas, senseless and often laughable prose that sounds like it was pulled from the "poetry" journal of a self-important 15 year-old, and a cast of characters that throughout are like watching cardboard cutouts walking around VERY SLOWLY, and that's the novel.
Here are some humble observations.
First, chances are that you, Mr. Zusak, are not Antonin Chekhov. You are, therefore, incapable of properly describing the weather for use as a literary device, and you end up sounding like an asshole. Don't believe me?
"I like a chocolate-colored sky. Dark, dark chocolate." Really? Do you, now?
"The sky was dripping. Like a tap that a child has tried it’s hardest to turn off but hasn’t quite managed.” Really?? Wow. Next you'll tell me that the rain was like a shower. I'm moved.
"Oh, how the clouds stumbled in and assembled stupidly in the sky. Great obese clouds." Yes. Stupid, obese clouds! They need an education and a healthy diet!
Next, chances are that you, Mr. Zusak, are not William Styron or any one of the other small handful of authors that can get away with Holocaust fiction. They've done their research, had some inkling of writing ability, and were able to tell fascinating stories. You invented a fake town in Germany (probably so you didn't have to do any research) and told a long-winded and poorly-written story, and in 500+ pages you couldn't even make it to 1945, so you sloppily dropped off and wrapped it up in 1943. What's the point of writing historical fiction if you can't even stay within the basic confines of that hisotrical event? For me, this does nothing more than trivialize the mass murder of over 6 million people. Maybe that's why a 30 year-old Australian shouldn't write about the Holocaust. But that's just me. Moving on.
But what really makes this book expensive toilet paper is the bad writing which is to be found not just in bizarre descriptions of the weather, but really on every page. Some personal favorites?
"The breakfast colored sun."
"Somewhere inside her were the souls of words."
"The oldened young man." WTF?!!?
"He crawled to a disfigured figure."
"Her words were motionless."
"It smelled like friendship." (Remind me to sniff my friends next time I see them.)
"A multitude of words and sentences were at her fingertips." (HUH?)
"Pinecones littered the ground like cookies."
Sigh.
All of this is quite funny coming from a book where the main character supposedly learns the importance of words. Further, I love that the protagonist comes to the conclusion that Hitler "would be nothing without words." Really? REALLY? Would Hitler be nothing without WORDS? What about self-loathing, misplaced blame and hatred, an ideology, xenophobia, charisma, an army, and a pride-injured nation willing to listen? Don't those count for something??
The shit-storm comes to an end when a bomb lands on our fictional town, wiping out everyone save for the sometimes book-thief main character. Of course. Because weak writers who don't know how to end their story just kill everyone off for a clean break and some nice emotional manipulation. Written for maximum tear-jerking effect, our main character spews out some great lines when she sees the death and destruction around her:
To her dead mother, "God damn it, you were so beautiful."
To her dead best friend as she shakes him, "Wake up! I love you! Wake up!" (Didn't I see the same thing in that movie My Girl?)
Then she profoundly notes that her dead father "...was a man with silver eyes, not dead ones."
And this kind of angsty adolescent prose just never ended! It went on and on to form the one long-ass, senseless, disjointed story.
But that's ok. Take it all the junk, give it a quirky narrator, an obscure and mysterious title, throw in a Jew on the run from Nazis who likes to draw silly pictures of birds and swastikas, and market it all as Holocaust lit. Ahh, the packaging of bullshit makes for such a sweet best seller.
Swallow it down, America. Put it on the shelf next to The Kite Runner. You love this. You live for this.
SUCKED.
If you want to talk about the book, or why you liked it, or anything else, feel free.
UPDATE: FEB 17, 2014: I wrote this review 4 years ago on a foreign keyboad, so I'm well aware that I spelled Chekhov's name wrong. I'm not going to fix it, so please don't drive my review further up in the rankings by commenting on the misspelling. You're very dear, but I know his name is Anton and not Antonin. On that same note, you don't need to add comments telling me that I didn't like the book because I "don't know how to read" and "don't understand metaphors." I actually have an M.A. in in English Lit, so I do know how to read -- much better than you do, in fact. Now quit bothering me before I go get my PhD and then really turn into a credential-touting ass.
UPDATE: JULY 10, 2013: To all jr. high students who find themselves grossly offended by my review: please remember that every time you leave a comment here, you push my review up even higher in the rankings. Please save us both time and energy by not commenting. Thnx.
This was the biggest piece of garbage I've ever read after The Kite Runner. Just as with The Kite Runner, I'm (somewhat) shocked that this book is a bestseller and has been given awards, chewed up and swallowed by the literary masses and regarded as greatness. Riiiight.
The whole thing can be summed up as the story of a girl who sometimes steals books coming of age during the Holocaust. Throw in the snarky narration by Death (nifty trick except that it doesn't work), a few half-assed drawings of birdies and swastikas, senseless and often laughable prose that sounds like it was pulled from the "poetry" journal of a self-important 15 year-old, and a cast of characters that throughout are like watching cardboard cutouts walking around VERY SLOWLY, and that's the novel.
Here are some humble observations.
First, chances are that you, Mr. Zusak, are not Antonin Chekhov. You are, therefore, incapable of properly describing the weather for use as a literary device, and you end up sounding like an asshole. Don't believe me?
"I like a chocolate-colored sky. Dark, dark chocolate." Really? Do you, now?
"The sky was dripping. Like a tap that a child has tried it’s hardest to turn off but hasn’t quite managed.” Really?? Wow. Next you'll tell me that the rain was like a shower. I'm moved.
"Oh, how the clouds stumbled in and assembled stupidly in the sky. Great obese clouds." Yes. Stupid, obese clouds! They need an education and a healthy diet!
Next, chances are that you, Mr. Zusak, are not William Styron or any one of the other small handful of authors that can get away with Holocaust fiction. They've done their research, had some inkling of writing ability, and were able to tell fascinating stories. You invented a fake town in Germany (probably so you didn't have to do any research) and told a long-winded and poorly-written story, and in 500+ pages you couldn't even make it to 1945, so you sloppily dropped off and wrapped it up in 1943. What's the point of writing historical fiction if you can't even stay within the basic confines of that hisotrical event? For me, this does nothing more than trivialize the mass murder of over 6 million people. Maybe that's why a 30 year-old Australian shouldn't write about the Holocaust. But that's just me. Moving on.
But what really makes this book expensive toilet paper is the bad writing which is to be found not just in bizarre descriptions of the weather, but really on every page. Some personal favorites?
"The breakfast colored sun."
"Somewhere inside her were the souls of words."
"The oldened young man." WTF?!!?
"He crawled to a disfigured figure."
"Her words were motionless."
"It smelled like friendship." (Remind me to sniff my friends next time I see them.)
"A multitude of words and sentences were at her fingertips." (HUH?)
"Pinecones littered the ground like cookies."
Sigh.
All of this is quite funny coming from a book where the main character supposedly learns the importance of words. Further, I love that the protagonist comes to the conclusion that Hitler "would be nothing without words." Really? REALLY? Would Hitler be nothing without WORDS? What about self-loathing, misplaced blame and hatred, an ideology, xenophobia, charisma, an army, and a pride-injured nation willing to listen? Don't those count for something??
The shit-storm comes to an end when a bomb lands on our fictional town, wiping out everyone save for the sometimes book-thief main character. Of course. Because weak writers who don't know how to end their story just kill everyone off for a clean break and some nice emotional manipulation. Written for maximum tear-jerking effect, our main character spews out some great lines when she sees the death and destruction around her:
To her dead mother, "God damn it, you were so beautiful."
To her dead best friend as she shakes him, "Wake up! I love you! Wake up!" (Didn't I see the same thing in that movie My Girl?)
Then she profoundly notes that her dead father "...was a man with silver eyes, not dead ones."
And this kind of angsty adolescent prose just never ended! It went on and on to form the one long-ass, senseless, disjointed story.
But that's ok. Take it all the junk, give it a quirky narrator, an obscure and mysterious title, throw in a Jew on the run from Nazis who likes to draw silly pictures of birds and swastikas, and market it all as Holocaust lit. Ahh, the packaging of bullshit makes for such a sweet best seller.
Swallow it down, America. Put it on the shelf next to The Kite Runner. You love this. You live for this.
SUCKED.
1711 likes · Like
∙
flag
Sign into 카지노싸이트 to see if any of your friends have read
The Book Thief.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
July 24, 2008
– Shelved
May 11, 2010
–
Started Reading
May 12, 2010
– Shelved as:
worst-garbage-i-ve-ever-read
May 12, 2010
– Shelved as:
sucked
May 12, 2010
– Shelved as:
i-want-my-money-back
May 12, 2010
–
Finished Reading
March 21, 2012
– Shelved as:
rants
Comments Showing 1,201-1,250 of 1,263 (1263 new)

Sounds like someone needs to learn how to spell 🙄


Thank you!
Do kids in Germany do the same thing? “It’s good because it made me cry”? Ugh.
If you really do end up noting down the historical inaccuracies & fallacies, would you consider posting them here?

I’m reading the book in German and that means my notes are in German, too, so I’m afraid it would be complicated to translate the entirely of them. Plus, my English is not perfect, and the Internet is pretty judgy (mostly because of young Americans who can speak just their mothertongue and often are pretty badly at it, too, and cannot wrap their head that the Internet stranger they are so keen to verbal abuse speak English as his THIRD language...) But I will considered to post a summary of them (ugh, I‘m currently on page 90 and there are already plenty of them). The author did not do his research. I doubt he even bothered to Google it.

So yes, the metaphors are unusual. They are poetic. They are sometimes incredibly long and grandiose. But that is because the book emphasizes it's theme of words by playing around with the language to use them in the most creative ways possible. By not describing anything simply, because what a waste that would be. A waste of beauty, a waste of emotion, a waste of words. The Nazis waste words. They burn them and don't give them a second thought, but Lielse understands their power, and therefore will not miss a chance to soak them into her very being. By the end of the book, Liesel feels as though she wasted every second she spent with her foster family - but at least she still has her books, and she did not let them go to waste.
Sorry for the diatribe up there, but there is a reason this book is wordy and poetic that isn't just because it "wants to seem smart". It is emphasizing it's themes through the prose and syntax. Give it come credit.

Btw have you reviewed Harry Potter books? I would like to read your take on them


You understand what a book review is, right? Since you seem to be confused here's the definition: A book review is a form of literary criticism in which a book is merely described (summary review) or analyzed based on content, style, and merit.










Well, I don't think Shakespeare was a weak writer when he made his Elizabethan tragedies. However, I agree with you, not so much on the blackmailing elements (at least, in this case, the "porno-poverty" of the story is mitigated by a vague irony), but on the disproportionate length that weakens the rapid prose. Goodbye.

I’m mostly here to pedantically correct all the would-be pedants here saying “but Munich is a real city!” — Obviously! But this story was set in the fictional town of Molching. 🤫




If I'm being honest, I'll include this too. This review would have actually been funny for me even if you had a different view from the one I did, if you had left out all the swears and curses. Seriously, it did not make you sound like you're someone who has PhD in English.




What is wrong with not having the story extend to 1945? What's wrong with inventing a fictional town? This is a piece of literature, not a history textbook. I hope you are smart enough to understand that the point of the book is not to tell you the detailed historical events that have happened, but to show you the brutality and beauty that comes from people during times like World War II.
I would love for you to clarify why using Death as a narrator is a "nifty trick, but doesn't work". What about it that doesn't work? It makes the book more interesting and it does not impact the flow of the story at all. The intention is that when the reader was reading this story, it makes them feel like they are sitting here and relaxing with the character Death. It's a very unique experience and I don't see what about this kind of narration that "doesn't work".
What do you mean by "laughable prose"? It comes from a character who is supposed to be 12 years old. The point of the prose is for you to emphasize more with the characters, with Liesel, it makes them seem more real. And yet, you are criticising a 12 year old character for writing proses that does not match your expectations?
I am going to acknowledge that the quotes you pointed out from the book may not be the best writing from the author. However, your review is rather one sided. No literary work is perfect. What about the beautiful quotes? What about those that stir up emotions? Did you simply just overlook them? Just because you picked out a few spots that may seem like bad writing to you, does that mean you can simply overlook all the other incredible sentences written by the author? Your comment is regarding bad writing is straight up stupid. I am not going to add quotes since it makes the long comment even longer, but to prove my point, I recommend you search "Good quotes from The Book Thief", does that sound clear enough to you?
Again, the criticisms that you have provided are not on point. You claims are not evaluated clearly, your comment has a strong tendency to pick out the irrelevant information and as them as weak evidence to prove your point. It is not a balanced review of the book and there is no way in hell that it deserves a 1 star rating.

"It smelled like friendship." (Remind me to sniff my friends next time I see them.)
made me laugh so much everyone started looking at me funny."
:-D