La Petite Américaine's Reviews > The Book Thief

The Book Thief by Markus Zusak
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
59329
's review

did not like it
bookshelves: worst-garbage-i-ve-ever-read, sucked, i-want-my-money-back, rants

** spoiler alert ** UPDATE: AUG 26, 2016: This review has been here 8 years, has 18 pages of 854 comments and 764 likes. There's no outrage for you to add in the comments section that hasn't already been addressed.
If you want to talk about the book, or why you liked it, or anything else, feel free.

UPDATE: FEB 17, 2014: I wrote this review 4 years ago on a foreign keyboad, so I'm well aware that I spelled Chekhov's name wrong. I'm not going to fix it, so please don't drive my review further up in the rankings by commenting on the misspelling. You're very dear, but I know his name is Anton and not Antonin. On that same note, you don't need to add comments telling me that I didn't like the book because I "don't know how to read" and "don't understand metaphors." I actually have an M.A. in in English Lit, so I do know how to read -- much better than you do, in fact. Now quit bothering me before I go get my PhD and then really turn into a credential-touting ass.

UPDATE: JULY 10, 2013: To all jr. high students who find themselves grossly offended by my review: please remember that every time you leave a comment here, you push my review up even higher in the rankings. Please save us both time and energy by not commenting. Thnx.

This was the biggest piece of garbage I've ever read after The Kite Runner. Just as with The Kite Runner, I'm (somewhat) shocked that this book is a bestseller and has been given awards, chewed up and swallowed by the literary masses and regarded as greatness. Riiiight.

The whole thing can be summed up as the story of a girl who sometimes steals books coming of age during the Holocaust. Throw in the snarky narration by Death (nifty trick except that it doesn't work), a few half-assed drawings of birdies and swastikas, senseless and often laughable prose that sounds like it was pulled from the "poetry" journal of a self-important 15 year-old, and a cast of characters that throughout are like watching cardboard cutouts walking around VERY SLOWLY, and that's the novel.

Here are some humble observations.

First, chances are that you, Mr. Zusak, are not Antonin Chekhov. You are, therefore, incapable of properly describing the weather for use as a literary device, and you end up sounding like an asshole. Don't believe me?

"I like a chocolate-colored sky. Dark, dark chocolate." Really? Do you, now?

"The sky was dripping. Like a tap that a child has tried it’s hardest to turn off but hasn’t quite managed.” Really?? Wow. Next you'll tell me that the rain was like a shower. I'm moved.

"Oh, how the clouds stumbled in and assembled stupidly in the sky. Great obese clouds." Yes. Stupid, obese clouds! They need an education and a healthy diet!

Next, chances are that you, Mr. Zusak, are not William Styron or any one of the other small handful of authors that can get away with Holocaust fiction. They've done their research, had some inkling of writing ability, and were able to tell fascinating stories. You invented a fake town in Germany (probably so you didn't have to do any research) and told a long-winded and poorly-written story, and in 500+ pages you couldn't even make it to 1945, so you sloppily dropped off and wrapped it up in 1943. What's the point of writing historical fiction if you can't even stay within the basic confines of that hisotrical event? For me, this does nothing more than trivialize the mass murder of over 6 million people. Maybe that's why a 30 year-old Australian shouldn't write about the Holocaust. But that's just me. Moving on.

But what really makes this book expensive toilet paper is the bad writing which is to be found not just in bizarre descriptions of the weather, but really on every page. Some personal favorites?

"The breakfast colored sun."

"Somewhere inside her were the souls of words."

"The oldened young man." WTF?!!?

"He crawled to a disfigured figure."

"Her words were motionless."

"It smelled like friendship." (Remind me to sniff my friends next time I see them.)

"A multitude of words and sentences were at her fingertips." (HUH?)

"Pinecones littered the ground like cookies."

Sigh.

All of this is quite funny coming from a book where the main character supposedly learns the importance of words. Further, I love that the protagonist comes to the conclusion that Hitler "would be nothing without words." Really? REALLY? Would Hitler be nothing without WORDS? What about self-loathing, misplaced blame and hatred, an ideology, xenophobia, charisma, an army, and a pride-injured nation willing to listen? Don't those count for something??

The shit-storm comes to an end when a bomb lands on our fictional town, wiping out everyone save for the sometimes book-thief main character. Of course. Because weak writers who don't know how to end their story just kill everyone off for a clean break and some nice emotional manipulation. Written for maximum tear-jerking effect, our main character spews out some great lines when she sees the death and destruction around her:

To her dead mother, "God damn it, you were so beautiful."

To her dead best friend as she shakes him, "Wake up! I love you! Wake up!" (Didn't I see the same thing in that movie My Girl?)

Then she profoundly notes that her dead father "...was a man with silver eyes, not dead ones."

And this kind of angsty adolescent prose just never ended! It went on and on to form the one long-ass, senseless, disjointed story.

But that's ok. Take it all the junk, give it a quirky narrator, an obscure and mysterious title, throw in a Jew on the run from Nazis who likes to draw silly pictures of birds and swastikas, and market it all as Holocaust lit. Ahh, the packaging of bullshit makes for such a sweet best seller.

Swallow it down, America. Put it on the shelf next to The Kite Runner. You love this. You live for this.

SUCKED.
1711 likes · flag

Sign into 카지노싸이트 to see if any of your friends have read The Book Thief.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

July 24, 2008 – Shelved
May 11, 2010 – Started Reading
May 12, 2010 – Shelved as: worst-garbage-i-ve-ever-read
May 12, 2010 – Shelved as: sucked
May 12, 2010 – Shelved as: i-want-my-money-back
May 12, 2010 – Finished Reading
March 21, 2012 – Shelved as: rants

Comments Showing 1,201-1,250 of 1,263 (1263 new)


La Petite Américaine Cheri.Bee wrote: ""The oldened young man." WTF?!!?
"It smelled like friendship." (Remind me to sniff my friends next time I see them.)


made me laugh so much everyone started looking at me funny."


:-D


Heavenleigh  Start Alvira Somebody has a stick in there ass 😭🔍


La Petite Américaine Heavenleigh wrote: "Somebody has a stick in there ass 😭🔍"

Sounds like someone needs to learn how to spell 🙄


message 1204: by Dampfablassen (new) - added it

Dampfablassen Hiii, YOUR REVIEW NAILED IT. I started to read this garbage book for the sake to absolutely destroy it. I live in Germany and I'm currently studying to going to be an history teacher. I'm going to note everything down- every single historical inaccuracies or fallacy. I'm going to be prepared for when my pupils will straight tell me they adore the book because it's sooo sad and deep. Not under my watch, kids!


La Petite Américaine Dampfablassen wrote: "Hiii, YOUR REVIEW NAILED IT. I started to read this garbage book for the sake to absolutely destroy it. I live in Germany and I'm currently studying to going to be an history teacher. I'm going to ..."

Thank you!

Do kids in Germany do the same thing? “It’s good because it made me cry”? Ugh.

If you really do end up noting down the historical inaccuracies & fallacies, would you consider posting them here?


message 1206: by Dampfablassen (new) - added it

Dampfablassen Of course they do, kids in the whole world are always the same.
I’m reading the book in German and that means my notes are in German, too, so I’m afraid it would be complicated to translate the entirely of them. Plus, my English is not perfect, and the Internet is pretty judgy (mostly because of young Americans who can speak just their mothertongue and often are pretty badly at it, too, and cannot wrap their head that the Internet stranger they are so keen to verbal abuse speak English as his THIRD language...) But I will considered to post a summary of them (ugh, I‘m currently on page 90 and there are already plenty of them). The author did not do his research. I doubt he even bothered to Google it.


message 1207: by Imofreddie (new) - added it

Imofreddie We have this


message 1208: by Araceli (new) - rated it 5 stars

Araceli Lopez Torres Me encanto el libro deseé saber más .


message 1209: by Sofia (new) - rated it 5 stars

Sofia Sorrentino Well, might as well throw in my two cents since this is the thread that never ends. The Book Thief is a book about words. It's about how words can be ugly and terrible and harsh, but can also spin great beauty and turn the world on its head. The examples you used may not work for you personally, but I love them because they aren't supposed to be literal or logical. They are meant to be evocative, strange, and unusual. In a story about words, it makes an effort to try out different combinations of words that may or may not go together, with words to capture feelings that can't be captured with regular language, to look at the world as a series of images and metaphors because both Liesel and the narrator are trying to seek out beauty in the ugliness of the world around them and hold on to it, even as the beauty slips away and they are left with nothing - except for words.
So yes, the metaphors are unusual. They are poetic. They are sometimes incredibly long and grandiose. But that is because the book emphasizes it's theme of words by playing around with the language to use them in the most creative ways possible. By not describing anything simply, because what a waste that would be. A waste of beauty, a waste of emotion, a waste of words. The Nazis waste words. They burn them and don't give them a second thought, but Lielse understands their power, and therefore will not miss a chance to soak them into her very being. By the end of the book, Liesel feels as though she wasted every second she spent with her foster family - but at least she still has her books, and she did not let them go to waste.
Sorry for the diatribe up there, but there is a reason this book is wordy and poetic that isn't just because it "wants to seem smart". It is emphasizing it's themes through the prose and syntax. Give it come credit.


message 1210: by Nupura (new) - rated it 3 stars

Nupura I had such high expectations from this book and I was waiting for something - anything to happen which didn't. And like you said I dont know why people loved the story narrated by death about a girl who steals books... too boring.

Btw have you reviewed Harry Potter books? I would like to read your take on them


message 1211: by marion (new)

marion louise La petite Américaine, or the one always complaining about books other people love x)


message 1212: by Mavey (new) - rated it 5 stars

Mavey Sorry but i stoped reading your review when i found out you didn't like the kite runner


message 1213: by kya (new)

kya the entire book is about words & curiosity the author goes so in depth with every little thing because every word has some meaning behind it. i remember analyzing this book for school because it has so much figurative language that you have to break down i mean the author literally uses colors as symbolism it’s a little ridiculous but it’s what makes the book true to itself


message 1214: by Anna (new) - rated it 1 star

Anna marion wrote: "La petite Américaine, or the one always complaining about books other people love x)"

You understand what a book review is, right? Since you seem to be confused here's the definition: A book review is a form of literary criticism in which a book is merely described (summary review) or analyzed based on content, style, and merit.


message 1215: by Star (new)

Star There is a thing called a metaphor.


message 1216: by Manoj (new) - rated it 1 star

Manoj Kumar Totally agree... this book is totally hyped. Goes to show what good advertising can do. There are page turners at half the price


message 1217: by Star (new)

Star Lol


message 1218: by Hannah (new) - rated it 1 star

Hannah F hahahahahaha (breathe) hahahahah oh my thanks so much dude. I just read the the inside jacketback cover and sprinted backwards from it. any book that is praised by oprah or some actress who has a "book club" or dumb womens magazines i avoid like the plague ... Any over hyped book ive made the mistake of trying has made my brain bleed.. Thanks for coherently saying what i had a feeling this nightmare was.


message 1219: by David (new) - rated it 5 stars

David its a great book


message 1220: by Kristy (new) - rated it 3 stars

Kristy H While I appreciate the writing, I didn’t love it, either mainly because I thought it was probably better suited for a classroom analysis vs. a leisure read. (I prefer easy fiction whereas I read details in non-fiction).


message 1221: by mad (new) - rated it 5 stars

mad mad cause bad?


message 1222: by Areo (new) - rated it 5 stars

Areo i can see where you are coming from in a way but it a beautiful story to show the things that people have gone through and possibilities of what could have been peoples during the holocaust. The author portrayed it very well and I think that he did a very good job with the connection between the little girl and the Jewish man. Heart breaking yet joyful.


Gerður María finally someone that agrees with me🙏


message 1224: by M (new) - rated it 3 stars

M Your review made me laugh on a rainy day- so thank you for that.


message 1225: by C (new) - rated it 3 stars

C I am genuinely relieved that someone else found the prose to be intolerable. I read this book years ago, and just thinking about it still annoys me.


message 1226: by Kieyla (new)

Kieyla Colbert LMAoAOOMAOAAOAO


message 1227: by Geoff (new) - rated it 5 stars

Geoff Hi, commenting because you're so uppity about it. Guess saying you have a PhD can't defend you from looking like a fool on the internet. Maybe they should add a class on that.


message 1228: by Jerika (new) - rated it 3 stars

Jerika Nguyen 💀


message 1229: by carmen (new) - rated it 5 stars

carmen Booo


message 1230: by Laura (new) - rated it 5 stars

Laura Russell Munich isn't a fictional town though?


Christina I stopped somewhere in the middle of a book and couldn't find the right words to describe. Then I found your review and here it is. You said it all ) Definite dnf, garbage 'literature' that should have been denied by any editor.


message 1232: by Tresvon (new) - added it

Tresvon I personally have picked this book up about 8 times now, and I'm barely past the introduction. It's not grasping me, and I, too, wondered how is this one of the most popular books


message 1233: by Carly (new) - rated it 1 star

Carly Rose It took me a year to finish this book because it was so boring and forced. I did like the writing, thought it was pretty. But man the whole thing was exhausting and pretty pointless.


*:・゚ taylor ✧*:・゚ never review again!!


message 1235: by Guido (new) - rated it 4 stars

Guido Martini "Because weak writers who don't know how to end their story just kill everyone off for a clean break and some nice emotional manipulation."

Well, I don't think Shakespeare was a weak writer when he made his Elizabethan tragedies. However, I agree with you, not so much on the blackmailing elements (at least, in this case, the "porno-poverty" of the story is mitigated by a vague irony), but on the disproportionate length that weakens the rapid prose. Goodbye.


message 1236: by Chris (new) - rated it 3 stars

Chris Goodwin An entirely fair review. Maybe a little harsh, but OP is entitled to express their disgust!

I’m mostly here to pedantically correct all the would-be pedants here saying “but Munich is a real city!” — Obviously! But this story was set in the fictional town of Molching. 🤫


message 1237: by Jake (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jake Jennings Fuck you


message 1238: by ella (new) - rated it 2 stars

ella readel thanks for this


message 1239: by Clara (new) - rated it 5 stars

Clara Roberts The book thief is a complex book. You either love it, or hate it. How dare you say that Zusak shouldn't be writing about the holicaust. Both of his parents are Austrian and German, and has ancestors that experienced the holocaust. Zusak has a complex way of writing, and think you have no right to accuse him of all this shit just because you didn't like the book. Get a grip on reality man


message 1240: by Clara (new) - rated it 5 stars

Clara Roberts It's so confusing to see people have this book when I loved it and adored every single sentence written in it, say what you want, but Zusak is fucking amazing


message 1241: by Clara (new) - rated it 5 stars

Clara Roberts I think people who didn't like this book are a little weak minded. Especially the "since its about the holocaust, I already know the ending" comments. What is the point of reading any WW2 book if you 'already know the ending, it just proves what dumb stuff people can say when hating. Also Zusaks parents are German and Austrian, so he's not a 30 y old Australian man. I dont understand why or how people dont like the writing style. It's so beautiful. Also I agree with another comment, "FOR somebody who wants respect you don't give... ANY?". You surely want your opinion to be respected, but you absolutely disrespect people who disagree or think you're wrong. Funny.


message 1242: by Inaya (new) - rated it 5 stars

Inaya Bansal I know I can't change your mind about this book, so I'm just going to be brutally honest here. Shouldn't matter, right? It's not like you care about what I'm writing. So I'm gonna write. I'm sorry (not), your whole hate review is just senseless. This book is literally part of my soul. If you knew me, you'd know that I'm really not an emotional person. I don't cry easily. Only 2 books have ever made me cry, and this is one of them. It's not my fault you can't appreciate good writing. Oh, and, who are you to criticize the author? Huh? I'd like to see you try writing a book better than this, because this is my absolute all time favourite. Zusak wrote a positively amazing book. It's the only book that's ever felt like it was breaking my heart, but it was the only thing keeping it together too, at the same time. And about all those BiZaRrE WeAtHeR DeScRiPtIoNs, have you ever heard of metaphors? Personification? I don't even care that half of my rants have probably already been mentioned in the comments- and please, you SO do not have to brag about your M.A. in English Literature. You having one doesn't make your English better than ours, seeing that you don't even know us. And since you're the adult here, shouldn't you have better things to do than go around writing hate reviews on books you hated? You're genuinely so damn lucky I do not know you, because let's just say I hit HARD. And yes, I am very obviously much younger than you (a jr. high student, as you would say. Though I do not call it jr. high here), and I'm supposed to 'respect my elders', as they say, but I do suppose exceptions have to be made sometimes.

If I'm being honest, I'll include this too. This review would have actually been funny for me even if you had a different view from the one I did, if you had left out all the swears and curses. Seriously, it did not make you sound like you're someone who has PhD in English.


message 1243: by Kahree (new) - added it

Kahree Honestly, the laughable phrases and adjectives make me want to read it just to laugh (not at the holocaust that's a sicko move. At the adjectives chosen)


message 1244: by Sarah (new) - rated it 5 stars

Sarah Orebaugh Seriously?? It’s well regarded as one of best ww2 books written in history right behind Anne frank, sure you can not like an authors writing style but dragging it thi the mud just because someone uses word to describe this differently than what you like it unacceptable. People flocked to this book because it paints the same picture with a different pen as if rather than this happened and that happened then he actually paints a picture for you. Just because you don’t like the art doesn’t mean you have to scream about how bad it is to you. I love the book thief it’s my favorite book I’ve read just because of the time period and how it was written


message 1245: by Avani (new)

Avani Dewasthali Honestly speaking, your review made me laugh. I hadn't really thought about the weather descriptions in this way before, and when I saw your comments, I couldn't help but laugh. I found this book difficult to read at first, and although it might be because of the fact that I am only 13, it is also just like you said: the way that the author has written the book, what with the wierd bolding parts and with the narrator being death, just doesn't make sense. I know many people enjoy this book, and I don't want to diss them AT ALL. I would just like to say that honestly, the author could have written this better. Maybe the writing style is significant in a way, but Markus Zusak should have understood that it could potentially pose a problem to the understanding. This book was difficult to read. I'm still contemplating whether to finish the last 30-or-so pages or not.


message 1246: by Tony (new)

Tony You don't get the point of this piece of literature.

What is wrong with not having the story extend to 1945? What's wrong with inventing a fictional town? This is a piece of literature, not a history textbook. I hope you are smart enough to understand that the point of the book is not to tell you the detailed historical events that have happened, but to show you the brutality and beauty that comes from people during times like World War II.

I would love for you to clarify why using Death as a narrator is a "nifty trick, but doesn't work". What about it that doesn't work? It makes the book more interesting and it does not impact the flow of the story at all. The intention is that when the reader was reading this story, it makes them feel like they are sitting here and relaxing with the character Death. It's a very unique experience and I don't see what about this kind of narration that "doesn't work".

What do you mean by "laughable prose"? It comes from a character who is supposed to be 12 years old. The point of the prose is for you to emphasize more with the characters, with Liesel, it makes them seem more real. And yet, you are criticising a 12 year old character for writing proses that does not match your expectations?

I am going to acknowledge that the quotes you pointed out from the book may not be the best writing from the author. However, your review is rather one sided. No literary work is perfect. What about the beautiful quotes? What about those that stir up emotions? Did you simply just overlook them? Just because you picked out a few spots that may seem like bad writing to you, does that mean you can simply overlook all the other incredible sentences written by the author? Your comment is regarding bad writing is straight up stupid. I am not going to add quotes since it makes the long comment even longer, but to prove my point, I recommend you search "Good quotes from The Book Thief", does that sound clear enough to you?

Again, the criticisms that you have provided are not on point. You claims are not evaluated clearly, your comment has a strong tendency to pick out the irrelevant information and as them as weak evidence to prove your point. It is not a balanced review of the book and there is no way in hell that it deserves a 1 star rating.


message 1247: by Lilah (new) - rated it 5 stars

Lilah Wow, you hated the book so much yet you choose to spend a bunch of time complaining about it, I guess not everyone can read books where you actually use that brain you brag about so much. I don’t care that I’m making your review more popular when I do this because you get SO many more reality checks that way. For example, you go around criticizing the author when I don’t see you making a historical masterpiece that everybody loves, not to mention the author is Australian AND German so he may know more about the Holocaust then you. Maybe instead of bragging so much about that M.A in English you should go and see a therapist, or a history professor. I haven’t even met you and I don’t like you, not because you didn’t like the book, I respect all opinions, but because you made a respectful community who have lots in common with you, hate you. This is also marketed as YA fiction so it’s supposed to be relatable to teenagers, you are not a teenager. So if you can’t handle the genre, just don’t read it. From someone who is supposed to be smart I thought you would have thought about this out by now.


message 1248: by Maria (new) - rated it 1 star

Maria You are correct.....this sucked


message 1249: by Reader (new)

Reader IM CRYINGGG THIS REVIEW IS SO FUNNY


message 1250: by Kai (new) - rated it 5 stars

Kai I loved the book but I also loved this review. My sincerest apologies if it wasn't meant to be hilarious.


back to top