La Petite Américaine's Reviews > The Book Thief

The Book Thief by Markus Zusak
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
59329
's review

did not like it
bookshelves: worst-garbage-i-ve-ever-read, sucked, i-want-my-money-back, rants

** spoiler alert ** UPDATE: AUG 26, 2016: This review has been here 8 years, has 18 pages of 854 comments and 764 likes. There's no outrage for you to add in the comments section that hasn't already been addressed.
If you want to talk about the book, or why you liked it, or anything else, feel free.

UPDATE: FEB 17, 2014: I wrote this review 4 years ago on a foreign keyboad, so I'm well aware that I spelled Chekhov's name wrong. I'm not going to fix it, so please don't drive my review further up in the rankings by commenting on the misspelling. You're very dear, but I know his name is Anton and not Antonin. On that same note, you don't need to add comments telling me that I didn't like the book because I "don't know how to read" and "don't understand metaphors." I actually have an M.A. in in English Lit, so I do know how to read -- much better than you do, in fact. Now quit bothering me before I go get my PhD and then really turn into a credential-touting ass.

UPDATE: JULY 10, 2013: To all jr. high students who find themselves grossly offended by my review: please remember that every time you leave a comment here, you push my review up even higher in the rankings. Please save us both time and energy by not commenting. Thnx.

This was the biggest piece of garbage I've ever read after The Kite Runner. Just as with The Kite Runner, I'm (somewhat) shocked that this book is a bestseller and has been given awards, chewed up and swallowed by the literary masses and regarded as greatness. Riiiight.

The whole thing can be summed up as the story of a girl who sometimes steals books coming of age during the Holocaust. Throw in the snarky narration by Death (nifty trick except that it doesn't work), a few half-assed drawings of birdies and swastikas, senseless and often laughable prose that sounds like it was pulled from the "poetry" journal of a self-important 15 year-old, and a cast of characters that throughout are like watching cardboard cutouts walking around VERY SLOWLY, and that's the novel.

Here are some humble observations.

First, chances are that you, Mr. Zusak, are not Antonin Chekhov. You are, therefore, incapable of properly describing the weather for use as a literary device, and you end up sounding like an asshole. Don't believe me?

"I like a chocolate-colored sky. Dark, dark chocolate." Really? Do you, now?

"The sky was dripping. Like a tap that a child has tried it’s hardest to turn off but hasn’t quite managed.” Really?? Wow. Next you'll tell me that the rain was like a shower. I'm moved.

"Oh, how the clouds stumbled in and assembled stupidly in the sky. Great obese clouds." Yes. Stupid, obese clouds! They need an education and a healthy diet!

Next, chances are that you, Mr. Zusak, are not William Styron or any one of the other small handful of authors that can get away with Holocaust fiction. They've done their research, had some inkling of writing ability, and were able to tell fascinating stories. You invented a fake town in Germany (probably so you didn't have to do any research) and told a long-winded and poorly-written story, and in 500+ pages you couldn't even make it to 1945, so you sloppily dropped off and wrapped it up in 1943. What's the point of writing historical fiction if you can't even stay within the basic confines of that hisotrical event? For me, this does nothing more than trivialize the mass murder of over 6 million people. Maybe that's why a 30 year-old Australian shouldn't write about the Holocaust. But that's just me. Moving on.

But what really makes this book expensive toilet paper is the bad writing which is to be found not just in bizarre descriptions of the weather, but really on every page. Some personal favorites?

"The breakfast colored sun."

"Somewhere inside her were the souls of words."

"The oldened young man." WTF?!!?

"He crawled to a disfigured figure."

"Her words were motionless."

"It smelled like friendship." (Remind me to sniff my friends next time I see them.)

"A multitude of words and sentences were at her fingertips." (HUH?)

"Pinecones littered the ground like cookies."

Sigh.

All of this is quite funny coming from a book where the main character supposedly learns the importance of words. Further, I love that the protagonist comes to the conclusion that Hitler "would be nothing without words." Really? REALLY? Would Hitler be nothing without WORDS? What about self-loathing, misplaced blame and hatred, an ideology, xenophobia, charisma, an army, and a pride-injured nation willing to listen? Don't those count for something??

The shit-storm comes to an end when a bomb lands on our fictional town, wiping out everyone save for the sometimes book-thief main character. Of course. Because weak writers who don't know how to end their story just kill everyone off for a clean break and some nice emotional manipulation. Written for maximum tear-jerking effect, our main character spews out some great lines when she sees the death and destruction around her:

To her dead mother, "God damn it, you were so beautiful."

To her dead best friend as she shakes him, "Wake up! I love you! Wake up!" (Didn't I see the same thing in that movie My Girl?)

Then she profoundly notes that her dead father "...was a man with silver eyes, not dead ones."

And this kind of angsty adolescent prose just never ended! It went on and on to form the one long-ass, senseless, disjointed story.

But that's ok. Take it all the junk, give it a quirky narrator, an obscure and mysterious title, throw in a Jew on the run from Nazis who likes to draw silly pictures of birds and swastikas, and market it all as Holocaust lit. Ahh, the packaging of bullshit makes for such a sweet best seller.

Swallow it down, America. Put it on the shelf next to The Kite Runner. You love this. You live for this.

SUCKED.
1711 likes · flag

Sign into 카지노싸이트 to see if any of your friends have read The Book Thief.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

July 24, 2008 – Shelved
May 11, 2010 – Started Reading
May 12, 2010 – Shelved as: worst-garbage-i-ve-ever-read
May 12, 2010 – Shelved as: sucked
May 12, 2010 – Shelved as: i-want-my-money-back
May 12, 2010 – Finished Reading
March 21, 2012 – Shelved as: rants

Comments Showing 251-300 of 1,263 (1263 new)


message 251: by A (new) - rated it 5 stars

A Don't get me started on The fault in our stars. I might be the only teenager on this planet who hates that book with burning passion but honestly I don't care.
That book is full of pretentious 1 dimensional characters, eye-roll-worthy metaphors, nonsensical monologues, unconvincing romance, stupidity, boring and predictable plot etc. I'm pretty sure that La Petite will find some favourite dialogues and metaphors in that awful book. lol.
I don't understand why people compare Mr. Green and Mr. Zusak considering that TFioS pales in front of masterpieces like The Book thief.

Go ahead give that one a try. I would love to hear your and Bellomy's opinions on that book. Don't fall for the hype over that book- high GR average ratings and raving reviews because they all are misleading. Also, Green is overrated and his teeny fans are gullible enough believe whatever he says even if it is stupid and makes no sense.


La Petite Américaine If you're the only one who thinks differently from your peer group, you're doing something right. Glad you're one of the few who doesn't let the crowd think for her.


message 253: by A (new) - rated it 5 stars

A Thank you :)


Anthony Marchetta Interestingly, Green actually has won the Edgar award for a mystery novel he wrote, and I'd love to try that out.

You know what he strikes me as, now I think of it? A Jerry Spinelli wannabe. But Stargirl is a classic.


message 255: by Nazli (new) - rated it 1 star

Nazli Djalali uugh thank you.... was about to choke on my own frustration from seeing all the 5 star reviews for this pretentious, self-satisfied, over sentimental piece of trash... I think this is written for people who can't be bothered to actually think and react while reading, and would prefer to be spoon-fed with emotions and thoughts.


message 256: by A (last edited Nov 21, 2013 09:46AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

A @ Bellomy

I'm doubtful about picking anything written by Green again. His writing style is simply not my thing.

I would've suggested you to read my review on The fault in our stars but it contains massive spoilers.

One thing I never bought though, and still don't buy, is that kids with cancer suddenly become magically wise. Yeah, right. They become terrified and confused and depressed and angry. They don't magically gain great insight and the ability to give long monologues about the meaning of life.

I agree with you. Like I said before that whole book is just ridiculous.


message 257: by Susan (new) - rated it 4 stars

Susan maybe you should try writing a book....I'm sure it would be as shitty as your reviews. why read if you hate everything you read. but....you are entitled to your opinion...even if it is garbage.


La Petite Américaine How many comments and likes do *your* reviews have, Susan? :)


message 259: by y (new) - rated it 5 stars

y fnthvkfvwirjbftjwksor.
okay. I am calm now. so, la petite americaine( i take french 2 right now), i agree wih most of what you are saying. the literary elements in this book are......awkward, to say the least. how few books he stole also bother me. but there is one thing i do not agree with you on, an that is that you said that words were not hitler's only weapon. When you think about though, without words, hitler would not have been able to manipulate the thoughts of the German people without words, turn there anger to the Jews without words, have complete power over the people without ords. That is one thing the authkr of this book got right. Words are what rule our world now.
Now, there is one other element that got me through this book. Every time I read a book, I choose to take the life of one of the characters.What pain the feel, I feel. What misery they face, I face. I know that it is weird, but that is how I function. In the Book Thief, I chose to be the character that appealed to me the most, and that was Max. Though the stories he told childish, the drawings he drew below average human intelligence, he was a character with a high soul capacity.This is why I rated the book
five stars. How could I not? It was me in that story after all, was it not?
P.S. I read this book last year, and reread it this year.
P.S.S. I am thirteen years old right now.


La Petite Américaine @Meron: Thanks for sharing your thoughts here and I'm glad you enjoyed the book.


message 261: by Haley (new) - rated it 5 stars

Haley Ramos I respect your opinion, although... I have an opinion of my own. Hitler wouldn't have been much at all without words. You do realize that, don't you? Hitler used propaganda to persuade. Propaganda is literally a choice of words, WORDS, and how you use them to persuade.
Without propaganda Hitler would have just been some genius with a mustache. He was a great speaker, he used WORDS wisely to persuade the masses.
Take this ^ from a major student in world history.
Not trying to start a little school yard fight, just voicing my opinions.


message 262: by Allison (new)

Allison Awesome review! I have picked this book up in the store so many times, opened it, and put it back down. I've scratched my head and wondered what I was missing. Why is this book a best seller? It seems like a bunch of scribbled random thoughts and I could barely stand to read the first few pages. Now that the movie is coming, I once again found myself trying to decide whether or not to give this book a go. Thanks to your brilliant review, my suspicions have been confirmed. I'll save my money and spare myself the torture


message 263: by Hayley (new) - rated it 5 stars

Hayley I love this book. It is a great way to introduce kids to sacrifice, historical time periods, and empathy.

Also, I think your review was a useless piece of poop.


message 264: by Alla (new) - rated it 4 stars

Alla When you will know how to spell Chekhov's first name, I might listen to what you have to say.


message 265: by Nana (new) - rated it 4 stars

Nana I don't agree with you, although the end seemed like kind of a rip-off. I thought your reveiw was funny though. Is it safe to assume you're not planning to see the movie?!


message 266: by Alex (new) - rated it 5 stars

Alex Pearl Chloe wrote: ".......This is one of my favorite books this year oddly enough for the same reasons you all hated it. I loved the character Death and thought that it was the coolest narration ever. Max's books tha..."

You make a good point. Of course Death speaks in an awkward and cumbersome fashion; that's the point. This whole book is about words. Anyone, including the so-called reviewer, who doesn't understand this, is a bit dense to say the very least.


Anthony Marchetta Wait, wait, wait, as a fan of the book, I've never heard anybody say that Death speaks in an "awkward or cumbersome fashion"...unless they were criticizing the book. I don't even agree with that.


La Petite Américaine Some things to address (since these messages won't stop coming):

--Is there a typo in this review, Alla? Forgive me: I wrote it up 6 years ago on a foreign keyboard. I'm sure you'll get over it.

--Several examples are listed above as to why Death is a lame narrator; one should clearly see that there is no purpose for this; it's just bad writing.

--No, I will not see this movie. Ever. The book was so horrid and pointless that you'd have to be rather silly to assume I'd spend $15 to watch some overpaid Hollywood actors play it all out on the big screen. I'd rather watch the Star Wars films (the new ones, not the classics) a 100 times in a row than see this film. That is to say, yes, I'd seriously watch 1,000 hours of Natalie Portman embarrassing herself with that shitty dialogue as JarJar Binks flops around doing whatever it is that he does--all of that before seeing the Book Thief.


La Petite Américaine *while JarJar Binks, not "as"


message 270: by Anna (new) - rated it 1 star

Anna I agree completely. Just finished it and thought it was terrible. The writing was bad. The pacing was bad. The characters were unlikeable.


message 271: by Mav (new) - rated it 5 stars

Mav the emotional manipulation in this book complaints I see here is that guys, it's kinda the point, no matter what medium, TV, movies, or books, the author/screenwriter/actor wants the audience to be emotionally invested, wants to pull on the heart strings, to get people to care. I liked it but I do see your point of view. I also have bad opinions on books lots of others think was good.


message 272: by C (new) - rated it 5 stars

C This was a hilarious review despite the fact that I completely disagreed with it
All reviews should be written like this


message 273: by 6138 (new) - rated it 1 star

6138 Agree with you 100% Petit, this book is pure garbage. I didn't burned it just because was a library book and then, adding insult to injury, I should paid for it or replaced it, adding more money to the pocket of this mediocre writer.
Unfortunately the popularity of this book is a brief taste of the cultural level of modern society, just a shame...


message 274: by Pierre (new) - rated it 3 stars

Pierre Fortier I agree with ya, i did not understand the buzz around this book. A real lost of time


message 275: by Nadine (new) - rated it 2 stars

Nadine I'm one of those people who appreciates reviews like yours. It won't stop me from reading the book, I just like honesty. Thank you.


La Petite Américaine I wasn't trying to be funny...I was dead serious and still am. This book sucked and if my son ever reads it, I'll disown him.


message 277: by Katie (new)

Katie Okay, so I normally try to refrain from posting any negative responses to comments, but I'm sorry, I have to with this one. First, The Kite Runner is one of the most beautiful books I have ever read. This book is right up there. As a writer myself, I noticed Zusak's witty analogies and metaphors. "Somewhere inside her were the souls of words" is painted on my wall, because to writers, words do have souls. You have to be able to find them. Weak writers don't kill off their characters. Weak writers make everything happy and don't know how to make you cry and then smile on the same page.A good writer understands that in order to make a story somewhat realistic,things have to happen. People die. War is real. People are killed. Having Death narrate was a really good twist. Death is an outsider, and yet so personal. Liesel decides that Hitler would be nothing without words, because he ruled with words and persuasion. He would have been nothing without his powerful speech skills. Just wondering, if you are saying that this book and the Kite Runner are trash, then what is a good novel. This story brought to light not only the good parts of humanity but the bad that is within good people. It was raw, emotional, and personal. I am just really confused here on why you would call this bad writing, because it is superb.


La Petite Américaine Well, I have a bunch of shelves dedicated to novels and memoirs that Ioved, which you can find on my profile. There's too much going on in your comment for me to address everything, and I disagree with you on every point (see my review above) but I'm glad you liked the book.


message 279: by 6138 (last edited Dec 06, 2013 07:23PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

6138 Katie wrote: "Hitler would be nothing without words, because he ruled with words and persuasion. He would have been nothing without his powerful speech skills."

Katie, I suggest that you read a couple of serious history books about not only WWII but also about WWI so you can begin to understand how and why Hitler assumed power in Germany and why he had under his belt way more than only words and persuasion.

"It was raw, emotional, and personal. I am just really confused here on why you would call this bad writing, because it is superb."

I agree with you in that the story was raw, it needed more than one editor... but if you are confused about why Petite and others are calling "The Book Thief" bad writing, well, you just have to explore good writing, so you can see the difference. I suggest you read Robertson Davies, Murakami, Paul Auster, Ishiguro, Trollope, John Crowley, William Styron, Borges, Cortazar, Sabato... just to name a few.


message 280: by Katie (new)

Katie Okay...Thank you all for your insight and you bring valid points to the table. I completely understand thst you may not enjoy a book,and thst is fine, but I do believe that you are mixing up writing styles. this style is supposed to be very different and quirky as told by an unorthodox narrator and is a bit more modern. Les Miserables for example, is told in a much much different style, as are many of the other authors listed above. I have explored good and bad writing, and I think its kind of hard to fitliterliterature into those two black and white topics.On a different note, one uses words for any circumstances, and if you read books about wwII and Hitler, you will see thst he was an exceptional speaker. It didn't take much, just some prodding in the right direction to get the Germans to go against Jews, because they needed someone to blame and Hitler used WORDS to convince them...


La Petite Américaine You're allowed to like the book. Just because I wrote a passionate rant about it a few years ago doesn't mean you can't like it or that your opinion is "wrong."

I think, however, that the words argument is a weak one and agree with 6138 that Hitler's rise to power is best understood by studying history and reading memoirs by/watching documentaries about people who lived it--and not by reading historical fiction written by a 30-something Aussie who can't even speak German.


message 282: by Anna (last edited Dec 07, 2013 05:00AM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Anna An example of well-written modern writing written in a different and unorthodox style would be "Life of Pi" by Yann Martel or "Cold Mountain" by Charles Frazier or "Fools Crow" by James Welch.

Read those and you'll see a noticeable difference.

As a writer myself, I can tell you that weak writers do, indeed, kill off all of their characters because they are unable to find a way to end their stories strongly without doing so. It takes a skilled writer to let their characters live. Being a writer you need to know when and how to let a character die and you cannot be afraid to do it when you need to do it. There are, however, better ways to make an emotional impact with a reader than slaughtering everyone in the last few pages.


message 283: by 6138 (new) - rated it 1 star

6138 Katie wrote: "Okay...Thank you all for your insight and you bring valid points to the table. I completely understand thst you may not enjoy a book,and thst is fine, but I do believe that you are mixing up writin..."

Katie, I am not mixing up writing styles, I am trying to point out good writing AMONG different writing styles, which is different.


message 284: by Katie (new)

Katie Life of Pi and Cold Mountain are fabulous books, and yes their writing style is unorthodox, just like this one. As for weak writers killing characters, again please look at the time period. They were in a war. War happens. Innocent people die. People survive, and have to live with the burdens of knowing they survived for the rest of their lives. This story takes place in one of the most horrible time periods in human history. It would actually make no sense I'd nobody died and in my opinion that would be weak writing. As a writer, it does take skill to let characters live, but it takes skill to kill them as well. Here we go again with the good writing bad writing thing. I honestly think it is hard to categorize any work into good writing and bad writing, simply because there are good and bad things in every piece


La Petite Américaine His grandparents being holocaust survivors inspired him to write the book; inspiration does not equate authority on a subject, and I can't take seriously someone who writes about that which they don't know, haven't researched, and haven't lived. To read something by someone who has no credibility has as much value (to me) as reading a fairy tale. It's a waste of time.

And yes, I am aware that I'm entitled to my opinion.


message 286: by Pierre (new) - rated it 3 stars

Pierre Fortier Pretty strong answer Petite américaine.


message 287: by La Petite Américaine (last edited Dec 11, 2013 10:01PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

La Petite Américaine @Pierre: I'm tired of explaining my opinion. I wrote the review years ago and said why I thought the book sucked, and people keep coming I tell me why I'm entitled to my opinion but "really here's why it was a good book."

Tiresome. The book sucked.


message 288: by Anna (new) - rated it 1 star

Anna I don't understand why people keep coming here to ... I don't even know ... maybe convince you to like the book? You read it. You didn't like it. You wrote an honest review. If they disagree, then they should just write their own reviews instead of starting arguments on yours.

Also ... the book did suck. A lot.


message 290: by Pierre (new) - rated it 3 stars

Pierre Fortier Agreed too. Good comment Anna.


message 291: by Alex (new) - rated it 5 stars

Alex Pearl La Petite Américaine wrote: "His grandparents being holocaust survivors inspired him to write the book; inspiration does not equate authority on a subject, and I can't take seriously someone who writes about that which they do..."

And I suppose inspirational works like '1984', 'Atonement' and 'Birdsong' all suck, too.


La Petite Américaine Alex wrote: "La Petite Américaine wrote: "His grandparents being holocaust survivors inspired him to write the book; inspiration does not equate authority on a subject, and I can't take seriously someone who wr..."

@Alex: I thought I banned you for trying to use my thread to name drop your book.

In any case, I haven't read Atonement or Birdsong. 1984 did not suck: it was written by an author who lived, knew, and understood his subject matter. Much different than an Aussie writing about something he never experienced in a place he's never been where they talk in a language he can't speak.


message 293: by Alex (new) - rated it 5 stars

Alex Pearl Didn't think you'd have a cogent answer to that.

I suppose you'd better ban me then.


La Petite Américaine As long you don't use my page to advertise your book, you're free to post whatever you want here.


message 295: by Chantal (new)

Chantal Sellers ROFL I'm glad you gave examples. I have reason not to go after this book now. I would be not picking it. It's easier to read the book not knowing bad writing is tangled up in it. It's easier to have it sneak up on you.


message 296: by Anne (new)

Anne Veneziano I have not yet read the book but your review ensures that I will. For what it is worth, you can convey your views without being crass, rude and profane.Your review is tasteless and poorly written. I do not think this site us intended for emotional diatribe. A little dignity on your part is in order.


message 297: by Alex (new) - rated it 5 stars

Alex Pearl Anne wrote: "I have not yet read the book but your review ensures that I will. For what it is worth, you can convey your views without being crass, rude and profane.Your review is tasteless and poorly written. ..."

Certainly worth your time. Fine book. And the seemingly clumsy writing style of its narrator, Death in a vaguely human form, is entirely intentional; and in my humble opinion, works beautifully.
Enjoy!


La Petite Américaine Anne wrote: "I have not yet read the book but your review ensures that I will. For what it is worth, you can convey your views without being crass, rude and profane.Your review is tasteless and poorly written. ..."

Don't read it then :)


La Petite Américaine Anne wrote: "I have not yet read the book but your review ensures that I will. For what it is worth, you can convey your views without being crass, rude and profane.Your review is tasteless and poorly written. ..."

There is a disclaimer at the top. Perhaps you didn't see it? "Please remember that every time you leave a comment here, you push my review up even higher in the rankings. Please save us both time and energy by not commenting. Thnx."


message 300: by Liz (last edited Dec 19, 2013 07:49PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Liz You just proved the point of The book thief, that words are more hateful and damaging. Like Hitler you are trying to convince the masses that this is a bad and poorly written book. Breakfast colored sky? When you are starving and surviving on gruel, fantasies of chocolate skies, sunny scrambled eggs clouds, obese or not are very real. You can get off your high horse now as you are clearly a lit bully. Go try to write a best seller of your own and get back to us in ten years.


back to top