La Petite Américaine's Reviews > The Book Thief
The Book Thief
by
by

La Petite Américaine's review
bookshelves: worst-garbage-i-ve-ever-read, sucked, i-want-my-money-back, rants
Jul 24, 2008
bookshelves: worst-garbage-i-ve-ever-read, sucked, i-want-my-money-back, rants
** spoiler alert **
UPDATE: AUG 26, 2016: This review has been here 8 years, has 18 pages of 854 comments and 764 likes. There's no outrage for you to add in the comments section that hasn't already been addressed.
If you want to talk about the book, or why you liked it, or anything else, feel free.
UPDATE: FEB 17, 2014: I wrote this review 4 years ago on a foreign keyboad, so I'm well aware that I spelled Chekhov's name wrong. I'm not going to fix it, so please don't drive my review further up in the rankings by commenting on the misspelling. You're very dear, but I know his name is Anton and not Antonin. On that same note, you don't need to add comments telling me that I didn't like the book because I "don't know how to read" and "don't understand metaphors." I actually have an M.A. in in English Lit, so I do know how to read -- much better than you do, in fact. Now quit bothering me before I go get my PhD and then really turn into a credential-touting ass.
UPDATE: JULY 10, 2013: To all jr. high students who find themselves grossly offended by my review: please remember that every time you leave a comment here, you push my review up even higher in the rankings. Please save us both time and energy by not commenting. Thnx.
This was the biggest piece of garbage I've ever read after The Kite Runner. Just as with The Kite Runner, I'm (somewhat) shocked that this book is a bestseller and has been given awards, chewed up and swallowed by the literary masses and regarded as greatness. Riiiight.
The whole thing can be summed up as the story of a girl who sometimes steals books coming of age during the Holocaust. Throw in the snarky narration by Death (nifty trick except that it doesn't work), a few half-assed drawings of birdies and swastikas, senseless and often laughable prose that sounds like it was pulled from the "poetry" journal of a self-important 15 year-old, and a cast of characters that throughout are like watching cardboard cutouts walking around VERY SLOWLY, and that's the novel.
Here are some humble observations.
First, chances are that you, Mr. Zusak, are not Antonin Chekhov. You are, therefore, incapable of properly describing the weather for use as a literary device, and you end up sounding like an asshole. Don't believe me?
"I like a chocolate-colored sky. Dark, dark chocolate." Really? Do you, now?
"The sky was dripping. Like a tap that a child has tried it’s hardest to turn off but hasn’t quite managed.” Really?? Wow. Next you'll tell me that the rain was like a shower. I'm moved.
"Oh, how the clouds stumbled in and assembled stupidly in the sky. Great obese clouds." Yes. Stupid, obese clouds! They need an education and a healthy diet!
Next, chances are that you, Mr. Zusak, are not William Styron or any one of the other small handful of authors that can get away with Holocaust fiction. They've done their research, had some inkling of writing ability, and were able to tell fascinating stories. You invented a fake town in Germany (probably so you didn't have to do any research) and told a long-winded and poorly-written story, and in 500+ pages you couldn't even make it to 1945, so you sloppily dropped off and wrapped it up in 1943. What's the point of writing historical fiction if you can't even stay within the basic confines of that hisotrical event? For me, this does nothing more than trivialize the mass murder of over 6 million people. Maybe that's why a 30 year-old Australian shouldn't write about the Holocaust. But that's just me. Moving on.
But what really makes this book expensive toilet paper is the bad writing which is to be found not just in bizarre descriptions of the weather, but really on every page. Some personal favorites?
"The breakfast colored sun."
"Somewhere inside her were the souls of words."
"The oldened young man." WTF?!!?
"He crawled to a disfigured figure."
"Her words were motionless."
"It smelled like friendship." (Remind me to sniff my friends next time I see them.)
"A multitude of words and sentences were at her fingertips." (HUH?)
"Pinecones littered the ground like cookies."
Sigh.
All of this is quite funny coming from a book where the main character supposedly learns the importance of words. Further, I love that the protagonist comes to the conclusion that Hitler "would be nothing without words." Really? REALLY? Would Hitler be nothing without WORDS? What about self-loathing, misplaced blame and hatred, an ideology, xenophobia, charisma, an army, and a pride-injured nation willing to listen? Don't those count for something??
The shit-storm comes to an end when a bomb lands on our fictional town, wiping out everyone save for the sometimes book-thief main character. Of course. Because weak writers who don't know how to end their story just kill everyone off for a clean break and some nice emotional manipulation. Written for maximum tear-jerking effect, our main character spews out some great lines when she sees the death and destruction around her:
To her dead mother, "God damn it, you were so beautiful."
To her dead best friend as she shakes him, "Wake up! I love you! Wake up!" (Didn't I see the same thing in that movie My Girl?)
Then she profoundly notes that her dead father "...was a man with silver eyes, not dead ones."
And this kind of angsty adolescent prose just never ended! It went on and on to form the one long-ass, senseless, disjointed story.
But that's ok. Take it all the junk, give it a quirky narrator, an obscure and mysterious title, throw in a Jew on the run from Nazis who likes to draw silly pictures of birds and swastikas, and market it all as Holocaust lit. Ahh, the packaging of bullshit makes for such a sweet best seller.
Swallow it down, America. Put it on the shelf next to The Kite Runner. You love this. You live for this.
SUCKED.
If you want to talk about the book, or why you liked it, or anything else, feel free.
UPDATE: FEB 17, 2014: I wrote this review 4 years ago on a foreign keyboad, so I'm well aware that I spelled Chekhov's name wrong. I'm not going to fix it, so please don't drive my review further up in the rankings by commenting on the misspelling. You're very dear, but I know his name is Anton and not Antonin. On that same note, you don't need to add comments telling me that I didn't like the book because I "don't know how to read" and "don't understand metaphors." I actually have an M.A. in in English Lit, so I do know how to read -- much better than you do, in fact. Now quit bothering me before I go get my PhD and then really turn into a credential-touting ass.
UPDATE: JULY 10, 2013: To all jr. high students who find themselves grossly offended by my review: please remember that every time you leave a comment here, you push my review up even higher in the rankings. Please save us both time and energy by not commenting. Thnx.
This was the biggest piece of garbage I've ever read after The Kite Runner. Just as with The Kite Runner, I'm (somewhat) shocked that this book is a bestseller and has been given awards, chewed up and swallowed by the literary masses and regarded as greatness. Riiiight.
The whole thing can be summed up as the story of a girl who sometimes steals books coming of age during the Holocaust. Throw in the snarky narration by Death (nifty trick except that it doesn't work), a few half-assed drawings of birdies and swastikas, senseless and often laughable prose that sounds like it was pulled from the "poetry" journal of a self-important 15 year-old, and a cast of characters that throughout are like watching cardboard cutouts walking around VERY SLOWLY, and that's the novel.
Here are some humble observations.
First, chances are that you, Mr. Zusak, are not Antonin Chekhov. You are, therefore, incapable of properly describing the weather for use as a literary device, and you end up sounding like an asshole. Don't believe me?
"I like a chocolate-colored sky. Dark, dark chocolate." Really? Do you, now?
"The sky was dripping. Like a tap that a child has tried it’s hardest to turn off but hasn’t quite managed.” Really?? Wow. Next you'll tell me that the rain was like a shower. I'm moved.
"Oh, how the clouds stumbled in and assembled stupidly in the sky. Great obese clouds." Yes. Stupid, obese clouds! They need an education and a healthy diet!
Next, chances are that you, Mr. Zusak, are not William Styron or any one of the other small handful of authors that can get away with Holocaust fiction. They've done their research, had some inkling of writing ability, and were able to tell fascinating stories. You invented a fake town in Germany (probably so you didn't have to do any research) and told a long-winded and poorly-written story, and in 500+ pages you couldn't even make it to 1945, so you sloppily dropped off and wrapped it up in 1943. What's the point of writing historical fiction if you can't even stay within the basic confines of that hisotrical event? For me, this does nothing more than trivialize the mass murder of over 6 million people. Maybe that's why a 30 year-old Australian shouldn't write about the Holocaust. But that's just me. Moving on.
But what really makes this book expensive toilet paper is the bad writing which is to be found not just in bizarre descriptions of the weather, but really on every page. Some personal favorites?
"The breakfast colored sun."
"Somewhere inside her were the souls of words."
"The oldened young man." WTF?!!?
"He crawled to a disfigured figure."
"Her words were motionless."
"It smelled like friendship." (Remind me to sniff my friends next time I see them.)
"A multitude of words and sentences were at her fingertips." (HUH?)
"Pinecones littered the ground like cookies."
Sigh.
All of this is quite funny coming from a book where the main character supposedly learns the importance of words. Further, I love that the protagonist comes to the conclusion that Hitler "would be nothing without words." Really? REALLY? Would Hitler be nothing without WORDS? What about self-loathing, misplaced blame and hatred, an ideology, xenophobia, charisma, an army, and a pride-injured nation willing to listen? Don't those count for something??
The shit-storm comes to an end when a bomb lands on our fictional town, wiping out everyone save for the sometimes book-thief main character. Of course. Because weak writers who don't know how to end their story just kill everyone off for a clean break and some nice emotional manipulation. Written for maximum tear-jerking effect, our main character spews out some great lines when she sees the death and destruction around her:
To her dead mother, "God damn it, you were so beautiful."
To her dead best friend as she shakes him, "Wake up! I love you! Wake up!" (Didn't I see the same thing in that movie My Girl?)
Then she profoundly notes that her dead father "...was a man with silver eyes, not dead ones."
And this kind of angsty adolescent prose just never ended! It went on and on to form the one long-ass, senseless, disjointed story.
But that's ok. Take it all the junk, give it a quirky narrator, an obscure and mysterious title, throw in a Jew on the run from Nazis who likes to draw silly pictures of birds and swastikas, and market it all as Holocaust lit. Ahh, the packaging of bullshit makes for such a sweet best seller.
Swallow it down, America. Put it on the shelf next to The Kite Runner. You love this. You live for this.
SUCKED.
1711 likes · Like
∙
flag
Sign into 카지노싸이트 to see if any of your friends have read
The Book Thief.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
July 24, 2008
– Shelved
May 11, 2010
–
Started Reading
May 12, 2010
– Shelved as:
worst-garbage-i-ve-ever-read
May 12, 2010
– Shelved as:
sucked
May 12, 2010
– Shelved as:
i-want-my-money-back
May 12, 2010
–
Finished Reading
March 21, 2012
– Shelved as:
rants
Comments Showing 251-300 of 1,263 (1263 new)


You know what he strikes me as, now I think of it? A Jerry Spinelli wannabe. But Stargirl is a classic.


I'm doubtful about picking anything written by Green again. His writing style is simply not my thing.
I would've suggested you to read my review on The fault in our stars but it contains massive spoilers.
One thing I never bought though, and still don't buy, is that kids with cancer suddenly become magically wise. Yeah, right. They become terrified and confused and depressed and angry. They don't magically gain great insight and the ability to give long monologues about the meaning of life.
I agree with you. Like I said before that whole book is just ridiculous.


okay. I am calm now. so, la petite americaine( i take french 2 right now), i agree wih most of what you are saying. the literary elements in this book are......awkward, to say the least. how few books he stole also bother me. but there is one thing i do not agree with you on, an that is that you said that words were not hitler's only weapon. When you think about though, without words, hitler would not have been able to manipulate the thoughts of the German people without words, turn there anger to the Jews without words, have complete power over the people without ords. That is one thing the authkr of this book got right. Words are what rule our world now.
Now, there is one other element that got me through this book. Every time I read a book, I choose to take the life of one of the characters.What pain the feel, I feel. What misery they face, I face. I know that it is weird, but that is how I function. In the Book Thief, I chose to be the character that appealed to me the most, and that was Max. Though the stories he told childish, the drawings he drew below average human intelligence, he was a character with a high soul capacity.This is why I rated the book
five stars. How could I not? It was me in that story after all, was it not?
P.S. I read this book last year, and reread it this year.
P.S.S. I am thirteen years old right now.

Without propaganda Hitler would have just been some genius with a mustache. He was a great speaker, he used WORDS wisely to persuade the masses.
Take this ^ from a major student in world history.
Not trying to start a little school yard fight, just voicing my opinions.


Also, I think your review was a useless piece of poop.


You make a good point. Of course Death speaks in an awkward and cumbersome fashion; that's the point. This whole book is about words. Anyone, including the so-called reviewer, who doesn't understand this, is a bit dense to say the very least.


--Is there a typo in this review, Alla? Forgive me: I wrote it up 6 years ago on a foreign keyboard. I'm sure you'll get over it.
--Several examples are listed above as to why Death is a lame narrator; one should clearly see that there is no purpose for this; it's just bad writing.
--No, I will not see this movie. Ever. The book was so horrid and pointless that you'd have to be rather silly to assume I'd spend $15 to watch some overpaid Hollywood actors play it all out on the big screen. I'd rather watch the Star Wars films (the new ones, not the classics) a 100 times in a row than see this film. That is to say, yes, I'd seriously watch 1,000 hours of Natalie Portman embarrassing herself with that shitty dialogue as JarJar Binks flops around doing whatever it is that he does--all of that before seeing the Book Thief.



All reviews should be written like this

Unfortunately the popularity of this book is a brief taste of the cultural level of modern society, just a shame...





Katie, I suggest that you read a couple of serious history books about not only WWII but also about WWI so you can begin to understand how and why Hitler assumed power in Germany and why he had under his belt way more than only words and persuasion.
"It was raw, emotional, and personal. I am just really confused here on why you would call this bad writing, because it is superb."
I agree with you in that the story was raw, it needed more than one editor... but if you are confused about why Petite and others are calling "The Book Thief" bad writing, well, you just have to explore good writing, so you can see the difference. I suggest you read Robertson Davies, Murakami, Paul Auster, Ishiguro, Trollope, John Crowley, William Styron, Borges, Cortazar, Sabato... just to name a few.


I think, however, that the words argument is a weak one and agree with 6138 that Hitler's rise to power is best understood by studying history and reading memoirs by/watching documentaries about people who lived it--and not by reading historical fiction written by a 30-something Aussie who can't even speak German.

Read those and you'll see a noticeable difference.
As a writer myself, I can tell you that weak writers do, indeed, kill off all of their characters because they are unable to find a way to end their stories strongly without doing so. It takes a skilled writer to let their characters live. Being a writer you need to know when and how to let a character die and you cannot be afraid to do it when you need to do it. There are, however, better ways to make an emotional impact with a reader than slaughtering everyone in the last few pages.

Katie, I am not mixing up writing styles, I am trying to point out good writing AMONG different writing styles, which is different.


And yes, I am aware that I'm entitled to my opinion.

Tiresome. The book sucked.

Also ... the book did suck. A lot.

And I suppose inspirational works like '1984', 'Atonement' and 'Birdsong' all suck, too.

@Alex: I thought I banned you for trying to use my thread to name drop your book.
In any case, I haven't read Atonement or Birdsong. 1984 did not suck: it was written by an author who lived, knew, and understood his subject matter. Much different than an Aussie writing about something he never experienced in a place he's never been where they talk in a language he can't speak.



Certainly worth your time. Fine book. And the seemingly clumsy writing style of its narrator, Death in a vaguely human form, is entirely intentional; and in my humble opinion, works beautifully.
Enjoy!

Don't read it then :)

There is a disclaimer at the top. Perhaps you didn't see it? "Please remember that every time you leave a comment here, you push my review up even higher in the rankings. Please save us both time and energy by not commenting. Thnx."

That book is full of pretentious 1 dimensional characters, eye-roll-worthy metaphors, nonsensical monologues, unconvincing romance, stupidity, boring and predictable plot etc. I'm pretty sure that La Petite will find some favourite dialogues and metaphors in that awful book. lol.
I don't understand why people compare Mr. Green and Mr. Zusak considering that TFioS pales in front of masterpieces like The Book thief.
Go ahead give that one a try. I would love to hear your and Bellomy's opinions on that book. Don't fall for the hype over that book- high GR average ratings and raving reviews because they all are misleading. Also, Green is overrated and his teeny fans are gullible enough believe whatever he says even if it is stupid and makes no sense.