|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0152023984
| 9780152023980
| 0152023984
| 4.33
| 2,361,196
| Apr 06, 1943
| May 15, 2000
|
it was amazing
|
‘The world is full of magic things patiently waiting for our senses to grow sharper,’ Irish poet W.B. Yeats once wrote, though his words may have been
‘The world is full of magic things patiently waiting for our senses to grow sharper,’ Irish poet W.B. Yeats once wrote, though his words may have been best said by a wise and lonesome fox who spills the secret that ‘it is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye.’ Even a desert can be beautiful if ‘it hides a well somewhere’ and even silence and loneliness can open up wonderment as ‘through the silence something throbs, and gleams.’To read the beloved classic The Little Prince by French author and aviator Antoine de Saint-Exupéry is to experience a refreshment of the heart and soul not unlike the shared joy between the novellas principal characters when they slake their thirst with the cool water from the aforementioned desert well. It is a reminder to see the world through your heart and not just your eyes, to embrace ephemerality to understand the intense beauty that can be found in impermanence, to measure life by what matters to you in order to create meaning, and, most importantly, to hold on to the childlike sense of astonishment and innocence even as the road to adulthood threatens to erode it. There is a deceptive simplicity conjoining a vastness of layered themes and lessons and while The Little Prince is a quick read, it is one with power to last a lifetime as I suspect all of us who have encountered the book have our own Little Prince cozily nestled in our hearts. The elegant accessibility makes this an incredible children’s classic yet the lessons are just as ripe for adult reading. I’d go so far as to say it is arguably more valuable for adults who hope to find Yeat’s magic in the everyday because, as we learn, ‘only the children know what they are looking for,’ and Saint-Exupéry’s whimsical adventure lights the lamp of our inner childhood and reminds us to cultivate and keep the flame alive. And so this tale of two adventurers lost a long way from home in the Sahara desert transcends its themes of loneliness, overcoming adversity, and searching for meaning to become, like the titular Prince himself, a literary companion to show us the magic of life revealed only to those who look with their heart. But, dear reader, is the spirit of childhood still alive within you? ‘Well, I must endure the presence of a few caterpillars if I wish to become acquainted with the butterflies.’ As I began The Little Prince I wondered if the child self who first read it many years ago would still recognize me. Would they even like me? Would they bristle that, despite having loved this story, I grew up anyways? Or would they understand that the childhood caverns of wonderment and aspirations that towered like mountains have dissolved into the drabness of dry logic, labor, math, and money of the adult world. ‘it is such a mysterious place, the land of tears’ Saint-Exupéry writes and what better name for the landscape of adulthood and overgrowth of responsibilities and sorrows. Like the narrator says ‘Perhaps I am a little like the grown-ups. I have had to grow old.’ The test is, as adult readers, if we open our hearts to gaze at the world will we still see the child inside us? Truthfully the narrator’s opening monologue disparaging his time with adults rang true in my heart and I too bemoan the loss of imagination that is shed along with the loss of innocence: ‘In the course of this life I have had a great many encounters with a great many people who have been concerned with matters of consequence. I have lived a great deal among grown-ups. I have seen them intimately, close at hand. And that hasn't much improved my opinion of them.’ I suppose the ending becomes a sort of litmus test, do we interpret it as the cold, somber logic of adulthood as a euphemism masking a loss or, in the spirit of childhood glee, do we accept the magical answer? If we don’t, do we wonder why readily accepted the Little Prince tending to his star and anthropomorphic flower yet draw the line at possible death? As far as the cold logic of adulthood goes, I’ve long been fascinated by Saint-Exupéry’s life and the real-world inspirations behind this novel. Even ordinary reality can blossom into a bloom of imagination if we look with our hearts, and Saint-Exupéry certainly understood his own assignment. The narrator’s ordeal in the Sahara is not unlike Saint-Exupéry’s experience in 1935 when he and co-pilot André Prévot crashed in the Sahara while attempting to break the speed record for a Paris-to-Saigon flight during an air race. The pair survived extreme thirst and hallucinations, events he would detail in his 1939 book Wind, Sand and Stars. Saint-Exupéry next to his downed plane in the Sahara Some of the biggest lessons in the novel also come from those close to Saint-Exupéry, such as the theory that the novella’s oft quoted line about seeing with the heart , Silvia Hamilton Reinhardt, who was also the model for the fox. The Prince’s words about his body being merely a shell was inspired by the dying word’s of Saint-Exupéry’s brother François who reassured Antoine saying “Don't worry. I'm all right. I can't help it. It's my body." His own wife, also comes alive in the novel through his imagination as the inspiration for the Prince’s rose, who essentially sets the novel in motion when the Prince is so irked by her that he sets off exploring. Yet the biggest parallel between life and novel is one the author could not have predicted as, like the Prince vanishing without a trace, Saint-Exupéry disappeared during a reconnaissance flight in 1944. The wreckage of his plane was not located for 56 years but his body has never been found and there is still no answers to how the crash occurred. ‘The thing that is important is the thing that is not seen.’ In the spirit of meaning being something beyond the scope of mere vision, The Little Prince is teeming with sharp symbolism. My adult mind was able to decode these in ways I hadn’t as a youth, yet in the vast imagination of childhood nothing was missed when accepting them at their whimsical face value. The Baobab trees which plague the Prince and become his daily chore in order for them to not grow too large and choke off his planet are often interpreted by critics as a metaphor for fascism growing across Europe and suddenly becoming too big a problem before anyone realized. The trees, however, can certainly be read in a more general level of vices or obsessions that can grow into problems if left unchecked, such as the drunkard’s alcoholism (one of my favorite parts of the story is the drunkard saying he is drinking to forget that he is a drinker) or the business man’s obsession with counting stars. Though most endearing is the symbolism of the well, something that is valued less for it’s life-saving water and more because of the bonding moment between the narrator and the Prince, laughing together as they quench their thirst. ‘It is much more difficult to judge oneself than to judge others. If you succeed in judging yourself rightly, then you are indeed a man of true wisdom.’ Loneliness permeates the novel, which arrives in rather soft, melancholy tones in contrast to the bright imaginative qualities of the story. Each planet the Prince visits is inhabited by a single being who are engaged in more “grown up” tasks, some so caught up they are unaware of their own loneliness. While my favorite of them is the lamplighter, there is a lot to read into from each of these characters such as the critique of unbridled capitalism we see in the businessman where his striving for wealth appears as comically illogical, or the geographer who disregards the ephemeral and pains the Prince by thereby disregarding his rose. With each we see the dilemmas of adulthood that ‘no one is ever satisfied where he is.’ The rose is a central figure to the novel, at first a nuisance but then an image of the beloved for the Prince who realizes that ‘I was too young to know how to love her,’ in the early stages of the novel but comes to realize her value. The tragedy in life is how often it is we don’t realize the value of what we had until we are far away down the road of life. ‘One runs the risk of weeping a little, if one lets himself be tamed.’ At the story’s outset, the Prince is in search of truth. Much like many of us are. Yet as his adventure progresses he realizes that truth is not as important as what is ‘essential,’ and, as he learns from the fox ‘what is essential is invisible to the eye.’ The lies told by the rose bother him, yet eventually he comes to understand that the lies—or lack of truth—aren’t what truly matters but that the time he spent with her has made her matter to him. ‘It is the time you have wasted for your rose that makes your rose so important.’ This is the real heart of the novel and it approaches existential musing as the Prince’s travels and learning to live outside his comfort zone and experience new things teaches him that we create meaning by discovering what matters to us. The Prince is justified in caring for the Rose and spending time on her because she matters and therefore is meaningful. ‘But you mustn’t forget it. You become responsible forever for what you’ve tamed. You’re responsible for your rose.’ The Prince learns this is how relationships are formed, which the Fox refers to as being ‘tamed,’ and it threads lives together through mutual care. Throughout reading the book one could argue our familiarity with the Prince has mutually tamed one another, which only adds further emotional weight to the ending as absence of those we love bring sorrow. But that bond changes us, changes how we engage with the world, and allows us to witness existence through our hearts and not just our eyes. We see life through imagination and possibility. ‘A rock pile ceases to be a rock pile the moment a single man contemplates it, bearing within him the image of a cathedral.’ Through our eyes we just see stars twinkling in the sky. But to the narrator, tamed by the Prince, through his heart he hears the stars laughing. And we, too, can share in this joy if we choose to see with our hearts. ‘The proof that the little prince existed is that he was charming, that he laughed, and that he was looking for a sheep. If anybody wants a sheep, that is a proof that he exists.’ We, too, can see the magic in the mundane and find meaning in what matters to us if we open our hearts to the lessons of The Little Prince. We may have grown up, or are still in the process of doing so, but by keeping the Prince in our heart we keep the joy of childish wonder alive. And if on a clear night we gaze up at the stars we too may hear the pleasant laugh of the Prince shining down upon us. If there is such a thing as a perfect book, this is certainly one of them. 5/5 ‘I wonder,” he said, “whether the stars are set alight in heaven so that one day each one of us may find his own again…’ ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jun 18, 2025
|
Jun 18, 2025
|
Jun 18, 2025
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0393065790
| 9780393065794
| 0393065790
| 4.28
| 227
| 2005
| Mar 17, 2008
|
it was amazing
|
Poetry begins where language starts,’ wrote Irish poet Eavan Boland, ‘in the shadows and accidents of one person's life.’ And what a life she had. Pub
Poetry begins where language starts,’ wrote Irish poet Eavan Boland, ‘in the shadows and accidents of one person's life.’ And what a life she had. Publishing her first book of poetry while still a student, Eavan Boland would go on to become on of the biggest names in modern Irish literature with dozens of awards and over thirty books to her name when she passed in 2020 at the age of 75. New Collected Poems is an outstanding testament to the poet’s legacy, collecting her work from 23 Poems in 1962 through Against Love Poetry in 2001. Gorgeously threading ‘sex and history’ through her poems and making space to champion the lives and voices of women, their struggles, their erasure in the history and myths ‘written by men,’ as well as raising the everyday and ordinary to the level of legend, Boland poetic insight has a wide and wondrous berth of topics to travel upon her words. And it is words that interest her most. Born in Dublin in 1944, Boland moved to the UK at the age of six when her father became the Irish Ambassador to the UK and would grow up estranged from her homeland amidst anti-Irish sentiments and an education framed to delegitimize the Irish voices in history. Returning to the language of Ireland is a central theme and task for Boland to explore and transport the reader through, in keeping with the belief of Jacques Derrida that ‘exiles,’ as he wrote in Of Hospitality, ‘continue to recognize the language, which is called the mother tongue, as their ultimate homeland.’ An essential collection that shows Boland’s expertise in poetically demonstrating ‘there’s a way of life / that is its own witness,’ I have long loved New Collected Poems and consider it one of the more treasured books on my shelves. In the end It will not matter That I was a woman. I am sure of it. The body is a source. Nothing more. There is a time for it. There is a certainty About the way it seeks its own dissolution. Consider rivers. They are always en route to Their own nothingness. From the first moment They are going home. And so When language cannot do it for us, Cannot make us know love will not diminish us, There are these phrases Of the ocean To console us. Particular and unafraid of their completion. In the end Everything that burdened and distinguished me Will be lost in this: I was a voice. —from I distinctly remember the moment I heard Eavan Boland passed. It was a warm day, April 27, 2020 and only a few weeks into the Covid pandemic that had us working from home. I read the news and immediately leashed my dog and went for a long, long walk in the spring sun thinking of poetry and history and how I came to Boland a few years prior when I was spending a lot of time in Dublin back and forth. I had picked up her collection A Poet's Dublin at the amazing bookstore —Dublin’s oldest indie bookstore—and carried it with me through the streets, along the River Liffey (one of her best poems, the rather long Anna Liffey which you can read comes from the character through which James Joyce personifies the river in Finnegans Wake), and around Trinity College where Boland attended and taught, even into the . Boland became an immediate favorite and I’ve long loved her work, the way she can craft a poem that is both a wide-angle look at history in the context of the women creating it while simultaneously embodying a close-up of the personal. She’s a poet I often think of on walks, and a poet I will always hold dear in my heart. Here’s my favorite: Once The lovers in an Irish story never had good fortune. They fled the king’s anger. They lay on the forest floor. They kissed at the edge of death. Did you know our suburb was a forest? Our roof was a home for thrushes. Our front door was a wild shadow of spruce. Our faces edged in mountain freshness, we took our milk in where the wide apart prints of the wild and never-seen creatures were set who have long since died out. I do not want us to be immortal or unlucky. To listen for our own death in the distance. Take my hand. Stand by the window. I want to show you what is hidden in this ordinary, ageing human love is there still and will be until an inland coast so densely wooded not even the ocean fog could enter it appears in front of us and the chilled- to-the-bone light clears and shows us Irish wolves. A silvery man and wife. Yellow-eyed. Edged in dateless moonlight. They are mated for life. They are legendary. They are safe. Boland’s work ushers the reader through the dense foliage of Irish history and the strength of its people up against oppression. ‘ I’m an Irish poet. I always have been and always will be, ’ Boland said in a 2019 : ‘It’s not a transferable part of who I am. Nor is it alterable. So much of a poet’s formation has to do with rootedness, not just in a place but in a past. For good and ill, I’m constructed by that past, from the journey of those events and the struggle of that history. There’s no way of unwriting that and none of unliving it.’ Boland shapes her prose to the frame of history in a way that allows it to function like a mirror, like ‘the moon’s looking glass’ to show the world back to itself through her vision. That vision, more often than not, is one where women can be the focus. ‘ I began to write in an Ireland where the word “woman” and the word “poet” seemed to be in some sort of magnetic opposition to each other,’ she has , ‘I couldn’t accept the possibility that the life of the woman would not, or could not, be named in the poetry of my own nation.’ In the essay contained in her collection Domestic Violence, Boland addresses how the role of a poet should overturn the past to allow for new futures: ‘Can a single writer challenge a collective past? My answer is simple. Not only can, but should. Poetry should be scrubbed, abraded, cleared, and restated with the old wash stones of argument and resistance. It should happen every generation.’ A new future was forged from her work indeed. ‘I want a poem / I can grow old in,’ she writes in A Woman on a Painted Leaf, ‘I want a poem I can die in.’ While the loss of Boland at 75 is tragic, she at least passed in a literary reality where ‘In my generation, women went from being the objects of the Irish poem to being the authors of the Irish poem, and that was very disruptive in a literature that probably wasn’t prepared for that.’ Good for her, and good for all of us. This is dawn. Believe me This is your season, little daughter. The moment daisies open, The hour mercurial rainwater Makes a mirror for sparrows. It's time we drowned our sorrows —from ‘I was a voice,’ Boland writes and to be a voice is to have power, to be heard. Boland often uses this voice to highlight the women in history, commemorating their works and arts and joining that great lineage ‘rejoicing in / finding a voice where they found a vision.’ Such as her poem Code to computer pioneer : ‘I am writing at a screen as blue, As any hill, as any lake, composing this to show you how the world begins again: One word at a time. One woman to another.’ The male gaze hovers like a threat over many of Boland’s poems and we see her stanzas cascade like a force of nature despite it or how her lines coil to strike. Poems like Degas’s Laundress finds the speaker interceding between the lusts of an artist oogling the ‘roll-sleeved Aphrodites’ and protecting the laboring women. In her introduction to The Wake Forest Book of Irish Women's Poetry, editor Peggy O'Brien observes that Bolan examines how ‘Irish women have been doubly colonized’: ‘First, with Irsh men, by numerous foreign invasions, and, second, exclusively as women, by nationalism, a male preserve. As an icon of the long-suffering nation, the Irish woman becomes “Mother Ireland,” a static and silent object distanced from her actual, decidedly unromantic self.’ This is rather notable in the incredible poem where Boland tells ‘the truth of a suffered life’ through gorgeous lines like ‘love will heal / what language fails to know / and needs to say’ but also chronicles the role of women in the country. ‘The river took its name from the land / the land took its name from a woman’ and that we must ‘Make of a nation what you will / Make of the past / What you can.’ But just as importantly, she casts her poetic gaze over womanhood in a way that had previously been missing in poetry, particularly aging woman or mothers who were pushed out of the public gaze of history: ‘The body of an ageing woman Is a memory And to find a language for it Is as hard As weeping’ Motherhood makes its way into many of the poems and becomes a prevailing theme in her work. ‘I’ve often said that when I was young it was easier to have a political murder in a poem than a baby,’ she often quips : ‘ I always thought ordinary life was worth writing about, and that included my own…the subjects of the Irish poem back then were often landscapes or historical events or political memory. I was a woman in a house in the suburbs, married with two small children. It was a life lived by many women around me, but it was still not named in Irish poetry.’ To move her poem from the broad sweep of landscapes and politics to the politics of the household was a bold move for which Boland has been widely lauded and loved. And for the motherhood poetry, there are few more awe-inspiring than her poems about Persephone and Demeter, such as this opening half of The Pomegranate (read the full poem ): The only legend I have ever loved is the story of a daughter lost in hell. And found and rescued there. Love and blackmail are the gist of it. Ceres and Persephone the names. And the best thing about the legend is I can enter it anywhere. And have. As a child in exile in a city of fogs and strange consonants, I read it first and at first I was an exiled child in the crackling dusk of the underworld, the stars blighted. Later I walked out in a summer twilight searching for my daughter at bed-time. When she came running I was ready to make any bargain to keep her. I carried her back past whitebeams and wasps and honey-scented buddleias. But I was Ceres then and I knew winter was in store for every leaf on every tree on that road. Was inescapable for each one we passed. And for me. It is winter and the stars are hidden. Figures of myth and legend frequently appear in Boland’s poetry, especially in the earlier half of her career. There are Irish figures like Lir, but also many of the Greek gods and goddesses populate her prose such as the poem where ‘Ceres went to hell / with no sense of time.’ Boland states ‘I need time - my flesh and that history - to make the same descent’ because ‘myth is the wound we leave / in the time we have.’ What a great stab of a statement there. Irish Poetry We always knew there was no Orpheus in Ireland. No music stored at the doors of hell. No god to make it. No wild beasts to weep and lie down to it. But I remember an evening when the sky was dark at four. When ice had seized every part of the city and we sat talking-- the air making a wreath for our cups of tea. And you began to speak of our own gods. Our heartbroken pantheon: No Attic light for them and no Herodotus but thin rain and dogfish and the stopgap of the sharp cliffs they spent their winters on. And the pitch-black Atlantic night. And how the sound of a bird's wing in a lost language sounded. You made the noise for me. Made it again. Until I could see the flight of it: suddenly the silvery, lithe rivers of your southwest lay down in silence and the savage acres no one could predict were all at ease, soothed and quiet and listening to you, as I was. As if to music, as if to peace. Most striking, however, is the way Boland gives the everyday objects profound significance and elevates the ordinary to the level of myth. Similar to the way her poetry seeks to give voice to the woman muffled by history, her poetry also elbows out room in myth for women and the everyday. ‘I began to feel a great tenderheartedness toward these things that were denied their visionary life,’ Boland said in an , ‘nobody thought a suburb could be a visionary place for a poet. Nobody thought a daily moment could be.’ In a way, she is creating her own legends and myths while rising the figure of the Irish woman as a figure of mythical power as a symbol of the Irish nation. I see myself on the underworld side of that water, the darkness coming in fast, saying all the names I know for a lost land: Ireland. Absence. Daughter. —from The Lost Land The Irish language is intricately intertwined with Irish culture, both as a symbol of heritage and identity but also resistance and pride. And so, too, does language become a crucial support beam through Boland’s examinations of life and history. In her prose work in Object Lessons: The Life of the Woman and the Poet in Our Time, Boland writes on the importance of Irish language and how she left that loss as a child living in the UK: ‘Language. At first this was what I lacked. Not just the historic speech of the country. I lacked that too, but so did others. This was a deeper loss; I returned to find that my vocabulary of belonging was missing. The street names, the meeting places – it was not just that I did not know them. It was something more. I had never known them. I had lost not only a place but the past that goes with it and, with it, the clues from which to construct my present self.’ The loss of language is felt at a personal level, yet extends to a loss of history with Ireland eclipsed by the British. This appears most notably in her poem as she finds ‘Ireland was far away. And farther away / every year.’ In Habitable Grief she writes of being ‘Irish in England’ and disconnected from her language: ‘this is what language is: a habitable grief’ she writes, ‘which hurts / just enough to be a scar. // And heals just enough to be a nation.’ To retain the language, to give voice to women in the language, to let the language thread the past and the present and rise like a monument to Ireland are all felt in the powerful prose of Eavan Boland. I long to cry out the epic question my dear companion: Will we ever live so intensely again? Will love come to us again and be so formidable at rest it offered us ascension even to look at him? But the words are shadows and you cannot hear me. You walk away and I cannot follow. —from Love An essential collection from an essential poet and formidable voice for women in the arts, New Collected Poems is a marvelous overview of the poems of Eavan Boland. Her work helped reshape Irish poetry and through hers and the other women in her time ‘a woman in Ireland who wishes to inscribe her life in a poem has a better chance now to move freely around within that poem.’ Bringing the everyday and ordinary into the life of the mythic and giving space for women everywhere, Eavan Boland has left us a lasting legacy of gorgeous words that truly proves her own statement that ‘myth is the wound we leave / in the time we have.’ 5/5 That the 카지노싸이트 of Cartography is Limit --and not simply by the fact that this shading of forest cannot show the fragments of balsam, the gloom of cypresses, is what I wish to prove. When you and I were first in love we drove to the borders of Connacht and entered a wood there. Look down you said: this was once a famine road. I looked down at ivy and the scutch grass rough-cast stone had disappeared into as you told me in the second winter of their ordeal, in 1847, when the crop had failed twice, Relief Committees gave the starving Irish such roads to build. Where they died, there the road ended and ends still when I take down the map of this island, it is never so I can say here is the masterful, the apt rendering of the spherical as flat, nor an ingenious design which persuades a curve into a plane, but to tell myself again that the line which says woodland and cries hunger and gives out among sweet pine and cypress, and finds no horizon will not be there. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 13, 2025
|
Mar 13, 2025
|
Mar 13, 2025
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0811213021
| 9780811213028
| 0811213021
| 4.32
| 5,088
| 1995
| Nov 17, 1995
|
it was amazing
|
‘I felt as if the sky was torn off my life.’ The best books feel like companionship. Not simply because you carry them around to read, or hold in your ‘I felt as if the sky was torn off my life.’ The best books feel like companionship. Not simply because you carry them around to read, or hold in your hand like a talisman, but because they live inside your thoughts, engage your mind and heart, and color your days in their unique rays of light. In the opening work in her extraordinary Glass, Irony, and God, Anne Carson describes ‘three silent women at the kitchen table’: her mother, herself, and Emily Brontë who is practically a physical presence as she so occupies the speaker’s thoughts while rereading Wuthering Heights. Reading Glass, Irony, and God felt much the same and Anne Carson has been at all the tables or riding shotgun with me since the moment I cracked the cover. It is a text that engages with you as much as you engage with it. If there was a version of spinning straw into gold for writers, it would be Anne Carson though she won’t ask you for your firstborn—she’ll just steal your heart and mind as ‘goblins, devils and death stream behind me,’ regardless if you guess her name. And you’ll be better for it. Across intensely beautiful poems like The Glass Essay—more like an essay driving you to experience the sublime—poems on God, a witty retelling of the prophet Isaiah, Greek figures as TV men and an essay on gendering sound as patriarchal oppression, Anne Carson delivers clever wit and brilliant insights that left me awestruck. It is a book difficult to encapsulate but one that shines with a radiance of intellect and emotion to flood the heart and mind in its glory. ‘You remember too much, my mother said to me recently. Why hold onto all that? And I said, Where can I put it down?’ Carson’s Glass, Irony, and God is a book shelved under poetry for lack of a better category. It is poetry, to be clear, but yet somehow it feels like something wholly unique unto itself. Though this is also likely due to Carson tending to not consider herself a writer but a maker, something more akin to a craftsman. As she said in a : ‘Making a poem is making an object. I always thought of them more as drawings than as texts, but drawings that are also physically enterable through the fact of language. It was another way to think of a book, an object that is as visually real as it is textually real.’ It is how she comes to create original works such as the accordion fold-out book in a box, Nox, or Float with loose chapbooks like flotsam in a clear case. Glass, Irony, and God, first published in 1992 has become a touchstone for Carson’s works with The Glass Essay, a near 40 page poem that is just a much an essay on Brontë as it is the most strikingly poignant break-up poem I’ve ever encountered (you can read it in full ). ‘It is as if we have all been lowered into an atmosphere of glass,’ Carson writes, and this image permeates much of the collection with each section being like a museum of ideas frozen into words to capture their perfection as if behind glass of an exhibit. In the section The Truth About God, Carson describes God watching creation ‘inside the case // which was glassy black like the windows of a downtown bank /God could see the machinery humming / and He watched the hum,’ further instilling this idea of life behind glass ‘because the outer walls of God are glass.’ Author David Markson once described Wuthering Heights, the novel central to The Glass Essay as being mostly about people ‘continually looking in and out of windows’ and across this collection Carson looks in and out of windows of the self, of love, of history and each other through her prose, ushering us over to peer alongside with her. ‘Why be unstrung and pounded flat and pine away Imagining someone vast to whom I may vent the swell of my soul.’ I’ve read The Glass Essay half a dozen times already and I’ll read it a dozen more as it is sensationally good. We find the speaker visiting her mother who lives on the moors—doubly on the moors visiting them through Bronte’s novel as well—after finding her life unmoored when her lover abandons her. That his name was Law is linguistically great as we now see her in a state of being Lawless as if it is synonymous with loveless. As if love is a state of governance. ‘Love is freedom, Law was fond of saying. / I took this to be more a wish than a thought // and changed the subject,’ she writes. Unmoored on the moors, Lawless and without love, and to top it all off her father is fading into dementia and no longer remembers her or her mother. But in comes the words and biographical reflections of Emily Brontë and it becomes a brilliant journey of self-discovery. My heart leapt at the familiarity of a work of art or diving down a rabbit hole of obsessing over an artist becoming both a balm and a bastion against woes. ‘To see the love between Law and me turn into two animals gnawing and craving through one another towards some other hunger was terrible. Perhaps this is what people mean by original sin, I thought.’ Juxtaposing reflections on Brontë seeking her own freedom—‘liberty means different things to different people’—with her visions of “The Nudes” which she comes to understand as ‘naked glimpses of my soul,’ the poem becomes an incredible outpouring of self-reflection and observation of her former love ‘like a glass slide under a drop of blood.’ It is emotionally stirring, full of pain and Carson admits ‘I am interested in anger.’ But a moment I found to really speak to me was the way Carson looks at the interplay between the ache and passage of time: ‘Perhaps the hardest thing about losing a lover is to watch the year repeat its days. It is as if I could dip my hand down into time and scoop up blue and green lozenges of April heat a year ago in another country. I can feel that other day running underneath this one like an old videotape…’ I really love this imagery of time playing in layers over each other. In her book Eros the Bittersweet, Carson discusses how desire and strong emotion can shift time as ‘the ‘now’ of desire is a shaft sunk into time and emerging onto timelessness,’ bending time or doubling back over. I think of that where he asks ‘is it still raining back in November?’ as if the past is accessible due to the gravitational pull of desire. A doubling is a big element here and in Carson’s ideas on myth in general which she discusses in The Beauty of the Husband: A Fictional Essay in 29 Tangos: ‘All myth is an enriched pattern, a two-faced proposition, allowing its operator to say one thing and mean another, to lead a double life’ There is the doubling of the moors, the doubling of time, the doubling of the speaker and Brontë (‘my main fear,’ she confesses, is ‘I feel I am turning into Emily Brontë’) but also the double between Brontë and the concept of “thou,” which she explores in depth. ‘For someone hooked up to Thou, / the world may have seemed a kind of half-finished sentence,’ and she looks at Emily as the “whacher” in conversation between I and thou (note the poem begins with “I” marked like both a roman numeral for part 1 and I for the self). It is, eventually, a rather redemptive poem, something that springs into your heart and makes it swell in the beauty of the prose, the sort of pain that feels like purification. ‘I saw a high hill and on it a form shaped against hard air. It could have been just a pole with some old cloth attached, but as I came closer I saw it was a human body trying to stand against winds so terrible that the flesh was blowing off the bones. And there was no pain. The wind was cleansing the bones.’ Such a purification is also part of the section of Isaiah poems. Carson’s retelling of the Biblical story of the prophet—’a man who believed he was a nation’—confronts us with ideas of transcendence, prophecy and spiritual pain. Carson includes many images of purification (God ‘washed Isaiah’s hair in fire’) and rebirth from the destruction. ‘There is a kind of pressure in humans to take whatever is most beloved by them and smash it. Religion calls the pressure piety and the smashed thing a sacrifice to God. Prophets question these names. What is an idol? An idol is a useless sacrifice, said Isaiah’ As in the series of poems on god in which Carson writes ‘My religion makes no sense / and does not help me / therefore I pursue it,’ the Isaiah works look at the frustrated relationship between humans and the idea of the divine. Especially when questions around religion make us consider a question of essence or symbolism. ‘Our life is a camera obscura,’ Isaiah preaches, ‘you can hold up anything you like in front of that pinhole… and worship it on the opposite wall.’ Similarly, Carson looks at the way television can become a kind of alter all to itself in the section TV Men which has playful investigations of characters from Greek myth. Her segment on Hektor—’Wrong people look good on TV, they are so obviously / a soul divided’—has me guessing Carson was probably not into that 2004 film. ‘I study your sleeping for / at the bottom of the pool / like a house I could return to.’ I was rather charmed by Carson’s Fall of Rome section in which she juxtaposes the collapse of the Roman Empire with her own sense of estrangement while visiting Rome. ‘A stranger is someone desperate for conversation,’ she writes, seeking to assuage her alienation, for someone to ‘open // a day // to a stranger, / who has no day / of his own.’ Yet all around in life we see ruin and learn this, too, is natural. And likely inevitable. ‘What is the holiness of empire? It is to know collapse. Everything can collapse. Houses, bodies And enemies collapse When their rhythm becomes Deranged.’ Though perhaps after the initial section my favorite is Carson’s concluding essay, The Gender of Sound. Carson looks at the way sounds, particularly voices, have been gendered to relegate “feminine” voice and sound as a negative. ‘Putting a door on the female mouth has been an important project of patriarchal culture from antiquity to the present day. Its chief tactic is an ideological association of female sound with monstrosity, disorder and death.’ It is a wonderfully researched piece looking across human history such as Aristotle writing that ‘the high-pitched voice of the female is one evidence of her evil disposition, for creatures who are brave or just (like lions, bulls, roosters and the human male) have large deep voices’ or Ernest Hemingway’s criticisms of Gertrude Stein’s voice in A Moveable Feast. She examines how sounds denoted as “feminine” is socially couched in ideas that ‘characterize a person who is deviant from or deficient in the masculine ideal of self-control.’ It’s like a sound check for patriarchy. ‘This soul trapped in glass, Which is her true creation.’ There is a thematic thread on the ideas of self-control or not fitting into a mold. The Glass Essay examines Brontë, who’s work is ‘not at all like the poetry women generally write’ and that ‘there are many ways of being held prisoner’—especially under the expectations of men. The Laws in life. Aristotle’s gendering of sound implies that women lack a sense of self-control which begins to point towards the whole concept of “hysteria”, one of for women. A disorder that was simply a way to silence women or shut them away under claims of being overly emotional, ‘as if anger could be a kind of vocation for some women’ (Glass Essay). ‘It is a fundamental assumption of these gender stereotypes that a…man’s proper civic responsibility towards woman is to control her sound for her insofar as she cannot control herself,’ Carson critiques, and it is why the self-introspection, the embracing oneself as Nude and muse is a path away from being under Law. She asks us to look to literature, arts, history to find another way. ‘I wonder about this concept of self-control and whether it really is, as the Greeks believed, an answer to most questions of human goodness and dilemmas of civility. I wonder if there might not be another idea of human order than repression, another notion of human virtue than self-control, another kind of human self than one based on dissociation of inside and outside. Or indeed, another essence than self.’ A breathtaking work of originality, wit, and insight, Anne Carson’s Glass, Irony, and God is one of my new favorite possessions. This book consumed me for days, sat with me at all my tables, and still speaks in my thoughts wherever I go. Carson is a quirky genius and while I’ve enjoyed exploring her work in the past, now I want to read everything she has ever done with a newly intensified desire. What a creator, what a work, what an amazing book. 5/5 ‘Who in a nightmare can help himself?’ ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Feb 21, 2025
|
Feb 21, 2025
|
Feb 21, 2025
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
080216238X
| 9780802162380
| 080216238X
| 4.12
| 9,687
| Apr 04, 2023
| Apr 04, 2023
|
it was amazing
|
‘To be or not to be,’ is one of the most commonly quoted lines of Shakespeare. A well loved soliloquy from Hamlet contemplating life or death, action
‘To be or not to be,’ is one of the most commonly quoted lines of Shakespeare. A well loved soliloquy from Hamlet contemplating life or death, action or inaction, but ‘there’s the rub,’ as it also led to the Israeli military banning the play in 1989 during the First Intifada lest it inspire the Palestinian prisoners to ‘take arms against a sea of troubles / and by opposing end them.’ Shakespeare’s hauntingly complex tale of usurped sovereignty and the indignities of ‘the whips and scorns of time, / the oppressor’s wrong’ is ripe for metaphor of the Palestinian condition and so Hamlet once again returns to the West Bank in Isabella Hammad’s brilliant novel Enter Ghost. I am awestruck by how accomplished and assured this novel is—Hammad’s second novel following her 2019 The Parisian—one that begins already steeped in the anxieties of a border crossing interrogation as Sonia, an actress with both Dutch and Palestinian parentage, returns to Haifa and soon finds herself performing in a Palestinian production of Hamlet. Having been long removed from the region, Sonia finds herself like a ghost of Palestinian heritage now returned yet disconnected and unmoored from their struggles, especially in contrast with her academic and activist sister who has remained there. Having described herself as a ‘writer and political being formed by Palestine,’ Hammad uses her work as an avenue to examine and expose the violence of settlers and the suffering and silencing of Palestinians while making the reader consider alongside the characters if such witness through art is a form of political action or merely catharsis through acting. Amidst a story of political unrest that channels the rich history of Palestinian theater, Isabella Hammad’s Enter Ghost is as eloquent as it is evocative through explorations of identity and family in the context of a tumultuous history while weighing the role of art as political protest. ‘He’s saying, it’s a choice between life and death. But really…there’s a third way. You can be a ghost.’ Reading Enter Ghost is to traverse a fraught political history of violent displacement and grief upon a narrative of sublimity and well-written nuance. Hammad’s prose flows effortlessly and confidently, delivered like a seasoned veteran of the stage despite it only being her second novel. Her language cuts with a sharpness that manages to retain a softness to it while the story looms large like those of classic literature with a wealth of thematic investigations and sociopolitical commentary deftly packed into its engaging plot-line that ushers us along at a crisp pace. It’s very lovingly crafted and clever with an earnest attempt to portray the Palestinian condition as an identity where merely existing is connotatively viewed as politically threatening to the Israeli soldiers and settlers. The novel draws on a deep history of the region where prior knowledge is useful yet not necessary as Hammad ensures the historical context is understood within the narrative. As Aristotle wrote in Poetics—thematicall imporant here—‘poetry is more philosophical and more serious than history; poetry utters universal truths, history particular statements,’ and Hammad attempts to examine the history through fictional lived experience picked up along the way instead of pausing for exposition to ensure it is approachable for any reader. There are some excellent textures to heighten this effect here, too. Hammad’s explanatory note at the end stating that text of Hamlet comes from the Arabic translation by Jabra Ibrahim Jabra which she ‘freely translated back into the English language.’ Knowing the actors are supposed to be delivering these lines in Arabic despite them being in English on the page, the discrepancies in lines of Hamlet here from Shakespearean original therefore read as if it is a translated work. Hammad does her best to place you amongst the characters and in the anxious uncertainties where every moment ‘felt like a scrap of newspaper dancing on the draught above a fire, constantly about to burn and vanish,’ and she succeeds at every turn. ‘This place revealed something about the whole world.’ While there is a delightfully dynamic cast here, such as Mariam the play director with her ‘straightforward, repugnant, magnetic light,’ the young pop-star Wael cast as Hamlet who fears his mannerisms ‘are from someone else…I don’t know who I am underneath,’ and the rest of the play cast, the narrator Sonia still takes center stage. Much of the novel finds her grappling with identity and joining Mariam’s play becomes a catalyst for a deeper understanding individually, culturally and even as a member of her own family. ‘Writing is, for me, a way of engaging with the world,’ Hammad said in an and in Sonia we see how acting is a similar engagement. The actors contemplate how Hamlet can metaphorically nudge the Palestinian condition—though Hammad ensures the reader does so to without calling specific attention to it though lines like ‘to me this country is a prison’ will inevitably register different when delivered by characters living in a place often referred to as the world's largest open air prison—and, as one often does when working in art, Sonia begins to reflect on how events and people in her life take on symbolic meaning. Such as the symbols of Palestine, or those of Israel. ‘The soldier is a sacred figure, an image in their ideology as olive trees are in ours. When they look at their soldiers, they see sons and daughters. When we look at their soldiers, our hearts also beat harder, although it is for different reasons.’ Or there is the recurring memory of Rashid, a boy she met as a child who’s ‘starvation was symbolic…as a general motif of prolonged suffering,’ and became a symbolic rallying cry to activism for her sister, Haneen. And then, of course, performing Hamlet, a play that had been banned by Israel, is a rather symbolic act. ‘No theatre group has ever performed without having one or two of its members in jail.’ —Palestinian politician Hanan Ashrawi, 1976 Palestinians have a long history of artistic expressions of protest. I would encourage anyone to read Isabella Hammad’s on this history, which begins with a discussion on the play Return to Palestine, performed in 2017 when this novel is set about a character who is likely the inspiration for Uncle Jad’s name in Enter Ghost. As the actor Faris mentions in the novel, 1970s Palestinian theater was full of political intent and while writing Enter Ghost, Hammad interviewed many former member of the theater troupe Balalin who were founded under and referred to their art as ‘emotionally fulfilling,’ as ‘a very important milestone in the revolution, in the Palestinian resistance.’ Many of them were arrested or detained for their performances. While in the novel characters consider if they are acting politically or merely acting on the stage, Hammad discusses in her article why theater is a symbolically powerful form of protest and why it was often under attack by the Israeli military: ‘This hostility to theater perhaps had to do with its transitory nature: as a live, essentially unrepeatable art form, theater can be unpredictable and even volatile. It can incite action—the double meaning in the English word “act” is brought to life in the Palestinian context. It’s also an art form comprised of bodies occupying space. The backbone of the Israeli occupation is a military regime whose principal mechanism of power is the control of bodies in space.’ In Enter Ghost, we learn arts funding ‘counted as cooperation with people who desired the destruction of the Israeli state and was therefore treasonous.’ This effort to control and silence is everywhere and their play is being closely monitored under threat of being shut down, actors detained, and Mariam’s politician brother is on watch. Though, like Hamlet says, ‘the play is the thing by which I’ll catch the conscience of the King!’ ‘Nothing is more flattering to an artist than the illusion that he is a secret revolutionary.’ As Shakespeare writes in another of his plays, King John, ‘O that my tongue were in the thunder’s mouth! / Then with a passion would I shake the world.’ Such is the desire of artists who use their art as symbols of protest or solidarity. Though throughout the novel Hammad confronts us with a question whether art in times of struggle is truly effective action or merely acting. Sonia struggles while watching a demonstration being put down by armed forces wondering that ‘the meaning of our Hamlet depended on this suffering…our play needed the protests, but the protests did not need our play.’ In a key scene, Mariam cites the value of political art in a way that is sure to inspire: ‘[W]hen you read a novel about the occupation and feel understood, or watch a film and feel seen, your anger, which is like a wound, is dressed for a brief time and you can go on enduring…feel connected to the other people in the room…a kind of flowering in the chest at this sight of your community’s resistance embalemd in art.’ In Aristotle’s Poetics catharsis is shown as a purging of emotions, a release of tension after the play and, following this, Mariam concludes with a despair for that play and a huge blow to those who aim for protest through art that ‘all of this means that in the end you, or at least the middle classes, are less likely to fight the fight because despair has been relieved.’ That the art is nothing but a ‘narcotic.’ Sonia’s exhaustion and silence on the matter leaves a silence for the reader to consider this and contemplate agreement or our own arguments as pushback. It is a brilliant moment that forces us to engage. Let’s consider this more a moment. Brazilian anti-fascist theater maker once wrote: ‘The poetics of Aristotle is the poetics of oppression: the world is known, perfect or about to be perfected, and all its values are imposed on the spectators, who passively delegate power to the characters to act and think in their place. In so doing the spectators purge themselves of their tragic flaw—that is, of something capable of changing society.’ Those who engage in artistic expression of politics want to make a difference, but are we really just patting ourselves on the back? In 1993, Susan Sontag went to Sarajevo to put on Samuel Beckett’s play Waiting for Godot and ‘I was not under the illusion that going to Sarajevo to direct a play would make me useful in the way I could be if I were a doctor or a water systems engineer…But it was the only one of the three things I do—write, make films, and direct in the theater—which yields something that would exist only in Sarajevo, that would be made and consumed there.’ And even if ‘The artist may do no more than give us beauty, laughter, passion, surprise, and drama,’ as Howard Zinn wrote in Artists in Times of War, he also points out that ‘the artist is telling us what the world should be like, even if it isn’t that way now. The artist is taking us away from the moments of horror that we experience everyday by showing us what is possible.’ In a conversation with fellow author Sally Rooney (you should definitely read it ), Hammad states: ‘I don’t agree with Mariam there. But I think it’s misguided to believe a single work of art can, by itself, act quickly and significantly on the world; this seems like a category error.’ I’m reminded of the lines by Mahmoud Darwish that ‘A poem in a difficult time / is beautiful flowers in a cemetery’ The flowers are art that can’t take back death but make life beautiful nonetheless, but as he cautions earlier in the poem ‘If you ponder a rose for too long / you won’t budge in a storm.’ Hammad gives a good reminder that art is good, but it can’t be the only action. As poet Mohammed El-Kurd writes ‘ At a certain point, the metaphor tires. At a certain point, I’ll grab a brick.’ Hammad compares this idea with journalists, who Sonia think are ‘watching, to do nothing’ but reconsiders that ‘we needed the cameras. Half the power was in the recording, that the event was already being doubled and broadcast. Because of them, we were not only in Jerusalem, we were everywhere.’ Such is the heroism of Palestinian activist and journalist who, at the age of 7, began broadcasting the violence done to her communities on social media and of whom the Naomi Shihab Nye poetry collection The Tiny Journalist is about. ‘To remain human at this juncture is to remain in agony. Let us remain there: it is the more honest place from which to speak.’ --Isabella Hammad, Recognizing the Stranger As Edward W. Said argues ‘the power to narrate, or to block other narratives from forming and emerging is very important to culture and imperialism,’ and being able to narrate one’s own culture through art is important resistance. The attempts to silence the play in the novel is something not only occurring in the region but a struggle faced by Palestinians worldwide through the and punishment of those who speak in defense of Palestine. In a recent , Hammad addressed the censorship’s while calling out the hypocrisy of those who push back against calls for protecting Palestine under the guise of “free speech” in the US: ‘It’s a totally lopsided ideological element of American culture, that the highest good is free speech, rather than that free speech is a side product of a just political system... Obviously, it’s also completely hypocritical because it’s always free speech except for when it comes to Palestine.’ She goes on to critique how in the US battles over semantics and phrasing allows people to feel they’ve accomplished something without taking meaningful action. ‘It has to do with distance because they’re not close to the bombs,’ she states, which is something we see in Sonia in the novel. It isn’t until she is there amongst the violence and protests, where ‘a threat had materialised, of interrogation, of danger. Of dissolution, even,’ that she is able to truly understand and feel the horrors lived daily. 'I saw virtue in being true to myself, and to my shapeless inner turmoil. Or was that just another narrative I was spinning to comfort myself, in the face of what I lacked?' While the original title of the novel was the final lines of Hamlet, ‘Go Bid the Soldiers Shoot,’ indicating Fortinbra’s soldiers would invade and mop up, Enter Ghost functions perfectly as there are many ghosts in the narrative. There is the way the Palestinians removed from their land are like ghosts to the settlers. ‘We haunt them,’ her father laughs, ‘they want to kill us but we will not die.’ There is the ghost of denied motherhood haunting Sonia as she plays Gertrude. There is also Sonia feeling like a ghost, who has no Nakba story like the others, who feels ‘the intruder was my own reflection.’ But in taking action, she finds she can ‘dispel the ghost’ and become present. Her father states he 'was born into this,' but that 'It wasn’t until I left Palestine that I really knew Palestine.' With Sonia the family is able to bring it full circle and it isn't until she returns that she can truly know it. It makes for a powerful cycle of family narrative across generations. ‘There is now, and there is afterwards. There comes a feeling of life opening…we rise, and I began to feel a strange elation, one of thousands, moving at the same time, bowing at the same time, rising at the same time. It did not matter who or what I was. I was present…’ Isabella Hammad has created a masterpiece in Enter Ghost. It is a harrowing look at the conflict in the region, a brilliant look at the role of art in political struggle, and a insightful investigation into identity. Hammad writes with such power and this novel completely consumed me. I’d go as far as to say this is one of the best novels of the decade so far. A moving work that makes us think, feel, and, hopefully, act. 5/5 ‘If there’s a clear line from the force, the body follows…to draw a pure line between motivation and effect. Between conviction and action.’ ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 10, 2024
|
Nov 15, 2024
|
Nov 10, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0374602638
| 9780374602635
| 0374602638
| 3.86
| 250,456
| Sep 24, 2024
| Sep 24, 2024
|
it was amazing
|
Did I love this? YES But is it her best book? ...ALSO YES Review to come |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Sep 22, 2024
|
Oct 16, 2024
|
Feb 29, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
B0DT22S8GY
| 4.05
| 429,677
| Oct 19, 2011
| Sep 25, 2012
|
it was amazing
|
‘What you do, I do.’ A lifelong friend is a truly special bond. With roots of friendship growing from a shared childhood soil, continuing to coil aroun ‘What you do, I do.’ A lifelong friend is a truly special bond. With roots of friendship growing from a shared childhood soil, continuing to coil around one another’s lives through all the pruning of teenage years into adulthood, and having weathering the storms across the years together, it is a bond that bears many secrets and scars but also deep understanding. A lifetime contained in a companionship. My Brilliant Friend, the first of the Neapolitan Quartet from Elena Ferrante introduces us to Elena Greco and Raffaella Cerullo—Lenù and Lila, though everyone else calls her Lina—as adult Elena plunges us back through her memories to trace the trajectories of their lives. It is a brilliant novel, easily one of my favorites I read this year and one that consumed my thoughts and emotions in its epic of adolescence. Here we find life in a changing world as ‘a sticky, jumbled reality’ and watch the ways various ambitions play out to survive it. Across the pages of My Brilliant Friend, we experience a vastness of a community through a portrait of friendship, with Ferrante’s prose perfectly expressing naked honesty and heartfelt struggles to achieve in a violent, patriarchal community and comprehend oneself as an individual instead of merely in the context of a close companion. ‘There was something unbearable in the things, in the people, in the buildings, in the streets that, only if you reinvented it all, as in a game, became acceptable. The essential, however, was to know how to play, and she and I, only she and I, knew how to do it.’ Ferrante’s My Brilliant Friend moves at the slow yet steady pace of life through the days of childhood into adolescence. The pace and introspective narration—which sets Lenù’s sharp mind like a scalpel upon all she encounters—lulls the reader into an intimacy with the characters as if you, too, have grown up alongside them and each moment of anger or betrayal hits all the harder. While the novel contains multitudes in its thematic scope—community amidst violence and class disparity, the struggles of girlhood in an atmosphere of oppressive masculinity, education, language, and more—the heart beating boldly at the core of this impressive work is an exploration of friendship. A very complex friendship at that, so much so that Ferrante ‘ in its first rough draft, the story of Lila and Lenù fit very easily into a single, substantial volume,’ but upon writing realized how much nuance needed to be investigated until it became a four novel epic. ‘I had grown up with those boys, I considered their behavoir normal, their violent language was mine.’ Ferrante’s use of language is so direct, gritty and raw, often launching into a series of astute observations that leave you breathless. She has an unmistakable skill for crafting dynamic characters, their actions reading as so intimate and honest and the relationships so emotionally charged and complex. I enjoy how through the novel we see the side-characters also grow from children to young adults, not with a straight trajectory of unified personality but more a messy and amorphous growth that, in hindsight we can detect the a linearity but in the present can often be surprising much like how growing up with someone really is.The novel Little Women figures prominently into the story and multiple themes, and I felt there was an kinship of emotional resonance between Alcott’s work and Ferrante’s in the way we are privy to the complexities of interpersonal relationships as they navigate towards adulthood. ‘I feel no nostalgia for our childhood: it was full of violence.’ The story takes us into a neighborhood on the outskirts of Naples in the 1950s and into the violence of abuse, power and poverty. It is also the childhood home of the author, and while she doesn’t see the violence there as unique, it does register more strongly in contrast to the beauty of the region: Since it is a city by nature of astonishing beauty, the ugly — criminality, violence, corruption, connivance, the aggressive fear in which we live defenseless, the deterioration of democracy — stands out more clearly.’ We witness violence as rather commonplace, even amongst the children (a key early bonding moment between Lila and Lenù involves throwing rocks at boys), and toxic masculinity runs rampant. Told through the perspective of a child, we see how all the ugliness feels a natural part of their world, inseparable from daily life. Though early on we see a key realization when Lenù is shocked to find that Don Achille, the ‘ogre of fables’ is actually ‘a little out of proportion, but ordinary.’ Violence is everywhere and commonplace reality is far more menacing than any mythical creature. ‘I would have liked the nice manners that the teacher and the priest preached, but I felt that those ways were not suited to our neighborhood, even if you were a girl.’ Class divide is also inextricably linked here. Frequently we see resentments over class, or feelings of inadequacy, manifest into anger and violence. Or how those in power protect themselves through violence and intimidation. There are also deep resentments over the past and several characters have an awakening of the former sins in their community wrapped up in national politics and abuse against their own neighbors. It is not far out from the downfall of Mussolini and the fascists, which still casts a dark shadow over everything. Though in hard times, one often finds a companion to bear the burden and what better companion for the perceptive Lenù than Lila, a girl seemingly misunderstood but in whom Lenù find ‘the characteristic of absolute determination.’ Their dynamic across the years is something that will forever shake inside me and I found it such a powerful expression of the ways we tend to perceive ourselves through the fragments reflected back by others. Their bond is both companionship and competition, at least how Lenù perceives it, and she spends her life in constant self-comparison to Lila. It is powerfully portrayed how she always feels second best to her friend, and while she also find strength through Lila she also seems to be creating a sense of identity that can only be understood in the context of Lila. In this way, she is fearful of anything that separates them, finding that if Lila has a life without her she will lose sight of her own self as well. ‘ She stopped to wait for me, and when I reached her she gave me her hand. This gesture changed everything between us forever.’ It is a novel teeming with comparisons and her entire coming-of-age is always measured against her friend. Lenù’s constant self-assesment of her body is contrasted to Lila—she develops earlier but feels slighted that Lila is uninterested in this only to later feel less attractive once Lila matures—as well as her academic success, feeling Lila’s studies of language despite not attending school surpass her own abilities and, essentially, Lenù’s sense of self-worth is that no matter how good she is, Lila is always better. I particularly enjoyed how language is so central to the book, but also an aspect that is both connection and competition. This is most notable when her pride in her own writing is shattered by a single letter from Lila she perceives as superior. It is suspected later that Lila reading Lenù’s article causes her to realize Lenù has indeed surpassed her, but we only understand Lila through Lenù’s gaze. Ferrante has said the original draft intended to give Lila a voice, but she realized it is more effective to be confined to Lenù’s impressions and anxieties so Lila remains as mysterious to us as she is to Lenù. ‘She was struggling to find, from inside the cage in which she was enclosed, a way of being all her own, that was still obscure to her.’ Returning to Little Women, I find it telling that it was this book that set them off on their goals to create—to write novels for both but later Lila changes towards wanting to create her own style of shoe—and how, like the sister’s in Alcott’s work, they take different paths to try and overcome a society that has little room for the ambitions of women. The theme of trying to break outside the socioeconomic or gender barriers seems metaphored in Lila's condition where she sees the world as 'dissolving barriers.' For Lenù it is a path of academics, pursuing and achieving far beyond the usual room given to girls. Yet, by the end, we see it has alienated her from the life of her neighborhood. Lila abandons school but chases a dream to create and rise out of poverty through marriage (also to escape a worse relationship). They both discover that they are judged for these paths and Lenù’s fear that she is never good enough suddenly opens into a different anxiety that she is too good for her own contemporaries that 'I had also been following daily a path that they were completely ignorant of,' and now 'I had to suppress myself.' Which is altogether a tragic thought as, now that she finally has something to be proud of as an achievement of her own not in the shadow of Lila, it is something beyond comprehension of her peers and makes her feel alienated. Her own teacher had long warned her away from Lila, seeing Lila as just another person who will be wasted in the whirlwind of poverty and violence that seems inescapable. ‘At that moment I knew what the plebs were, much more clearly than when, years earlier, she had asked me. The plebs were us. The plebs were that fight for food and wine, that quarrel over who should be served first and better, that dirty floor on which the waiters clattered back and forth, those increasingly vulgar toasts. The plebs were my mother, who had drunk wine and now was leaning against my father’s shoulder, while he, serious, laughed, his mouth gaping, at the sexual allusions of the metal dealer. They were all laughing, even Lila, with the expression of one who has a role and will play it to the utmost.’ The threat of violence and masculinity is constantly thwarting them. Lenu’s own struggles with her feelings for Nino are complicated by the sexual advances of his father, for instance. Lila is stuck in a bad situation because the wealthy and abusive Marcello holds his power over the fate of her family if she does not marry him. The shoes, which are a symbol of hope and ambition throughout the novel, are later transformed into a symbol of betrayal and a warning that all ambition and advancement is gatekept by men and at the mercy of larger powers of wealth. ‘She gave off a glow that seemed a violent slap in the face of the poverty of the neighborhood.’ I adored this novel. I've had quite the run of great books at the end of this year and this is another headed straight to my "favorites" list. It is gritty, it is shocking, it is emotionally introspective, it is a stunning look at a whole community and most strikingly, everything about it feels so true and honest and intimate. I felt for Lenu every step of the way, I felt her hopes and Lila’s frustrations as if they were my own Ferrante drew me in so deeply into her work. There are some absolutely breathtaking moments of writing here, the whole final sequence especially had me shivering in literary glee and tension, particularly the moment where we get an unexpected insight on the ‘brilliant friend’ of the title. For me, My Brilliant Friend was just that: brilliant. I’m already diving into the second volume and Lenu, Lila and the cast of character’s around Naples have completely stolen my heart. 5/5 ‘We were little animals frightened of our own mediocrity.’ ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 07, 2023
|
Dec 07, 2023
|
Dec 07, 2023
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||||
0147514010
| 9780147514011
| 0147514010
| 4.17
| 2,382,967
| Sep 30, 1868
| Nov 17, 2023
|
it was amazing
|
Some books read like a lifelong friendship, each page a warm or comforting embrace as you laugh and weep along with the characters. Little Women by L.
Some books read like a lifelong friendship, each page a warm or comforting embrace as you laugh and weep along with the characters. Little Women by L.M. Alcott is an enduring and endearing classic that will nestle its way so deep into your heart that you’ll wonder if the sound of turning pages has become your new heartbeat in your chest. To read the novel is a magical experience, and we are all like Laurie peering in through the March’s window and relishing in the warmth within. I have long loved the film adaptations and make it a holiday tradition to ensure I at least watch it every December (it has Christmas in it, it counts), so it was fascinating to finally read the actual novel and return to character I feel I’ve always known yet still find it fresh and even more lovely than ever before. Semi-autobiographical, Alcott traces the lives of the four March sisters, Meg, Jo, Beth and Amy, and their struggles to make their own way in a society that offers little use for women beyond the household. An emotional epic and moving family saga full of strong characters, sharp criticisms on society and gender roles, and a beautiful plea to dispense with the worship of wealth and find true purpose and value in simplicity, nature and generosity. ‘I've got the key to my castle in the air, but whether I can unlock the door remains to be seen.’ Little Women will leave your heart full and your pen dry from underlining the seemingly endless lovely passages. I’d like to thank Adira and her wonderful review for convincing me to finally actually read this and not just watch the movie again (I did last night though, because who doesn’t want to relive the joy of yelling “Bob Odenkirk?!” in a theater and later sobbing) because, just when I thought I couldn’t love this story more, now I’m fully engulfed by it. Surely enough has been written about this book already, but i like to ramble about things I love so here’s a more I guess (I’ll try to keep it shorter than usual [having finished writing it now, I failed]). But how can you not be with such incredible characters? Jo is of course the favorite, but I think part of loving this book is wanting to be Jo and realizing you are Amy, but each character touches your heart in their own way. Mr. Laurence and Beth’s connection with the piano and lost daughters makes me teary just writing this. Alcott based the story on and one can read a genuine love for the characters pouring from every page. ‘Wealth is certainly a most desirable thing, but poverty has its sunny side, and one of the sweet uses of adversity is the genuine satisfaction which comes from hearty work of head or hand, and to the inspiration of necessity, we owe half the wise, beautiful, and useful blessings of the world.’ Alcott was a and many of her beliefs shine through in the novel. Much of this came from her father and one will be pleased to learn that the real Mr. March——was as radical in his time as his fictional counterpart. An abolitionist who also advocated for women’s rights, Amos became a major transcendentalist figure along with his friend, Ralph Waldo Emerson. Alcott’s mother was equally radical for her time too, and many of their teachings arrive here through Mrs. March to her children. There is, of course, the belief in nature as the ideal, such as when the March girls, having little jewelry, adorn themselves in flowers instead. Even Laurie states ‘I don’t like fuss and feathers,’ another instance of a return to simplicity over flashy status symbols. There is also the belief in generosity, which is seen throughout with the March family always involved in helping others, and the belief that hard work is important, but not for profit reasons but because it leads to spiritual and emotional happiness and freedom. ‘Then let me advise you to take up your little burdens again; for though they seem heavy sometimes, they are good for us, and lighten as we learn to carry them. Work is wholesome, and there is plenty for every one; it keeps us from ennui and mischief; is good for health and spirits, and gives us a sense of power and independence better than money or fashion.’ Towards the start of the novel, the mother advises the children to be like Christian from John Bunyan’s allegorical novel The Pilgrim's Progress and we can see how Little Women follows a similar fashion of Pilgrim’s being knowledge gained through the travel of a life lived, and each daughter is shown to face certain trials and must learn to bear their burdens, like Jo’s anger, Amy’s desire to be liked, Meg’s desire for vanity, Beth’s passivity. But the largest burdens here are those of love and labor. ‘Women, they have minds, and they have souls, as well as just hearts. And they’ve got ambition, and they’ve got talent, as well as just beauty. I’m so sick of people saying that love is all a woman is fit for.’ The relationship to work is threaded through the entire novel. We have Jo and Amy who wish to be great and break from the traditional mold for women in society. Jo wants to be a writer, though she only publishes scandalous stories under a false name, and Amy desires to be a painter. And neither will settle for anything less than greatness ‘because talent isn't genius, Amy states, ‘and no amount of energy can make it so. I want to be great, or nothing.’ Meg and Beth, on the other hand, show different routes a woman can take. The novel questions if women can find happiness outside marriage and caring for a household, and these struggles bash against social expectations along the way. ‘ I'll try and be what he loves to call me, 'a little woman,' and not be rough and wild; but do my duty here instead of wanting to be somewhere else.’ ‘ I can't get over my disappointment in not being a boy,’ Jo quips, and a major part of Little Women is a critique of gender roles and how they stifle people in society. Laurie is an excellent foil to Jo, in many ways, but is also a way that Alcott addresses and subverts gender expectations. Jo and Laurie both use shortened versions of their name that seem to cross gender expectations (even though Laurie didn’t like being called Dora) and in many ways Jo tends to represent more masculine behavior while Laurie often a more feminine role. While Meg dresses in finery and tries to fill the traditional role of a woman, Jo prefers to romp in nature in simple or dirty garments and behave, by her own admission, like a boy. Recently there has been a lot of discussion on the author’s gender and sexuality, with even the New York Times writing an opinion piece wondering if Alcott or Jo was a trans man. I know that frustrates some people but personally I find it interesting to think about, even if a bit anachronistic, but it seems to be a genuine question people investigate about authors who subvert gender expectations (think how often it was avoided to discuss Virginia Woolf’s sexuality in the past and now we have letters and look at scenes in Mrs Dalloway and think “oh yea, that makes total sense”). Honestly, I say Jo is whatever you want Jo to be. Trans, lesbian, ace, or just a girl pushing back on gender norms. I think the key detail is that Jo was breaking out of the mold, so let that empower you as you best see fit. Personally I thought the marriage to Friedrich felt tacked on anyways (I enjoy the way the Gerwig adaptation addresses this) but, side note, I do see how Alcott weaves in the transcendentalist notion of the “universal family” and belief in learning about and supporting other cultures here. Friedrich is German, Meg marries the English John, and Laurie is said to be half-Italian, which all comes as a rebuttal to the anti-immigration sentiments of the times. ‘I like good strong words that mean something,’ Jo says and that appeals to my love of language as well. This book deals with love in many ways, but feels like a romance between book and reader as you enjoy every page. Little Women was ahead of its time and still stands proudly today as an endearing work that dares challenge social convention. But most importantly, it feels like a friend. Finishing is hard as now I’ll miss the days with the March sisters, and I find books that take you from childhood to adulthood often hit the hardest because you feel as if you’ve grown up together. An emotional read, also a genius one, Little Women is a favorite now forever. 5/5 ‘ Watch and pray, dear, never get tired of trying, and never think it is impossible to conquer your fault.’ ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
not set
|
not set
|
Dec 04, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0241207002
| 9780241207000
| 0241207002
| 3.66
| 79,421
| Oct 20, 2016
| Oct 20, 2016
|
it was amazing
|
‘It was the worst of times, it was the worst of times.’ I find autumn to be my favorite time of year so it was little surprise that Ali Smith’s artisti ‘It was the worst of times, it was the worst of times.’ I find autumn to be my favorite time of year so it was little surprise that Ali Smith’s artistic expression of the season in Autumn would become a favorite book. It is a season that enfolds multitudes of contradictions inside itself, all tumbling about like the fallen leaves in the breeze yet somehow harmonizing the discordance into a bittersweet emotional symphony. It is the season of decay with the days eroding towards dark and cold yet the seasons proclaims a defiant death throe of comforting weather and vibrant colors like ‘a second spring when every leaf is a flower,’ as Albert Camus once wrote. Warm days with a crisp underbite. Personally, autumn has always felt like the ideal catalyst for the moments we synthesize as key details in our personal bildungsromans: the start of new school years bringing change and the excitement of new things or, in college years, the season coincides with that first taste of campus freedom and the intense early scenes of a university romance. ‘Autumns seem that season of beginning,’ Truman Capote wrote, and these beginnings conflicting with the symbolic endings of the season are a gorgeous contradiction that has always captured not only my heart, but many of the great writers and poets throughout the ages. Jane Austen tells us this in Persuasion, touching upon autumn as: ‘that season of peculiar and inexhaustible influence on the mind of taste and tenderness — that season which has drawn from every poet worthy of being read some attempt at description, or some lines of feeling.’ There is a high bar for autumnal expression and Ali Smith not only meets the challenge but creates something that combines the calendar season with a specific sort of political autumn in 2016. Above all, Smith captures the contradictory nature of autumn into a heartrending exploration of what it means to be a person and one person among many. While being rather melancholy in tone, Autumn reads rather playfully as it saunters through prose composed of puns, paintings and political polarization. To speak of a plot seems beside the point as Smith extracts meaning from quotidian moments, creating a collage of images that amalgamate towards an otherwise ineffable impression. Elisabeth,the central character in Autumn writes of of underrecognized British pop artist ’s collage work that ‘an image of an image means the image can be seen with new objectivity, with liberation from the original,’ and Smith’s narrative can be viewed as representing autumn in a similar regard. In this way, Autumn catalyzes past and present as well as the personal and political in a deeply moving work where each beautiful sentence fell into my heart like leaves cascading off the trees. ‘ The trees are revealing their structures. There’s the catch of fire in the air. All the souls are out marauding. But there are roses, there are still roses. ’ Ali Smith that her Seasons Quartet—a series of books that could plausibly be read as stand-alones or in any order (of which Autumn is the first) though do travel in a thematic movement forward like the passage of time they represent—‘would be about not just their own times, but the place where time and the novel meet.’ Time is central to everything here, even in its invisibility, and all the aspects of “past” and “present” presented here as the narrative sashays across the timeline seem to find the Brexit referendum as the major hinge between them. It represents not just the dividing line between “before” and “after” Brexit, which is something deeply felt in times of historical change just like how the Covid pandemic in 2020 often becomes a reference for “before” and “after” (Smith writes about this later in Companion Piece), but also a political dividing line between people. Smith spends several lengthy passages emphasizing this: ‘All across the country, people felt bereaved and shocked. All across the country, people felt righteous. All across the country, people felt sick. All across the country, people felt history at their shoulder. All across the country, people felt history meant nothing. All across the country, people felt like they counted for nothing. All across the country, people had pinned their hopes on it. All across the country, people waved flags in the rain. All across the country, people drew swastika graffiti. All across the country, people threatened other people. All across the country, people told people to leave. All across the country, the media was insane. All across the country, politicians lied. All across the country, politicians fell apart…’ This collective contradictory feeling, this sort of metaphorical autumn or “fall,” creates an uneasy backdrop to the novel. Smith excels at threading small details as subplots through the story that quietly emphasize this. There is the back-and-forth of graffiti on a wall spitefully telling people to go home and being reminded the UK is their home or the idea of being divided getting a physical manifestation as an electrified fence across the town at which Elisabeth’s mother eventually assaults with trinkets she finds at an antiques shop ‘bombarding that fence with people’s histories.’ Though my favorite is the rather humorous paperwork drama that unfolds with Elisabeth assailed by bureaucratic barriers in an attempt to renew her passport. As someone who often has to ask for multiple forms of ID in order to register people for a library card, Elisabeth being unable to provide ID without being able to renew her ID because of specifications that come across as comically absurd was rather darkly delightful to read. But all these details—Smith is extraordinary at writing about nothing, the quiet moments are so cathartically perfect—really add up to dynamically portray the specifics of the moment in time. ‘That's the thing about things. They fall apart, always have, always will, it's in their nature.’ Within the larger political is a rather intimate tale of the personal: the friendship between Elisabeth and Daniel which begins when she is a young girl and he, the aging neighbor, becomes a sort of caregiver so Elisabeth’s mother can dodge responsibilities and head out to town. This friendship becomes her sort of coming-of-age narrative, making a home in her heart that will inform the rest of her life. ‘The lifelong friends,’ Daniel, already an old man, says to her in her youth, ‘sometimes wait a lifetime for them.’ And sometimes it is the absences that speak loudest, with the past of their times together—experiencing art and playing thought and language games that excite and exercise the imagination and often tend to bend towards the political—juxtaposed with the present as she reads to him in a elderly care facility while he remains asleep at the ripe old age of 101. It is a really moving story and as Smith places each piece of their time together into the collective portrait of life the story only becomes sadder yet more beautiful. ‘A great many men don’t understand a woman full of joy, even more don’t understand paintings full of joy by a woman.’ The artist Pauline Boty is first introduced to her by Daniel and becomes a symbol within the novel not only for a feminist resistance against a patriarchy that would always try to delegitimize or sweep aside women’s efforts, but also an expression of art forged from political unrest. In this way, Smith ties the story of Boty with that of and the , from which her painting, Scandal 63, became a political statement (the painting has notably ). Pauline Boty with her painting of Christine Keeler, ‘Scandal 63’ Smith continues this legacy of forming art from the political. It is in the nature of art it seems, adapting and creating as if in refusal to be legislated into silence. Take the word “Brexit” for instance, a word that didn’t exist until the UK moved to break from the EU but now is a commonly known term: language creates and adapts to meet the times. ‘Language is like poppies. It just takes something to churn the earth round them up, and when it does up come the sleeping words, bright red, fresh, blowing about.’ I loved the moments with Daniel and Elisabeth where their word games became political expressions even without her realizing it, such as the incredible scene where Daniel takes Elisabeth’s image of a man with a gun and his with a man dressed as a tree and creates a story representing political oppression and violence against those who deviate from the socially-enforced “norms”. In a way a novel is a rebuttal against the news, particularly in times when people no longer trust the media. ‘I’m tired of the news. I’m tired of the way it makes things spectacular that aren’t, and deals so simplistically with what’s truly appalling,’ we are told, and a novel is a way to take those same details and organize them in ways that emphasize the emotional undercurrents that are often left out. A way to create a fiction that can do battle with the fictions told by those in power to obtain or retain power. ‘Always be reading something,’ Daniel advises, ‘even when we're not physically reading. How else will we read the world?’ This is why I find literature to be so important, it helps us read the world. ‘I'm tired of the vitriol. I'm tired of anger. I'm tired of the meanness. I'm tired of selfishness. I'm tired of how we're doing nothing to stop it. I'm tired of how we're encourageing it. I'm tired of the violence that's on it's way, that's coming, that hasn't happened yet. I'm tired of liars. I'm tired of sanctified liars. I'm tired of how those liars have let this happen. I'm tired of having to wonder whether they did it out of stupidity or did it on purpose. I'm tired of lying governments. I'm tired of people not caring whether they're being lied to anymore. I'm tired of being made to feel this fearful.’ In times of unrest, a beautiful story can really help us sort out our feelings. It remind me of the lines by Palestinian poet Mahmoud Darwish: ‘ A poem in a difficult time / is beautiful flowers in a cemetery.’ It is in art we can find hope, and hope is important to hold onto. ‘Hope is exactly that, that’s all it is, a matter of how we deal with the negative acts towards human beings by other human beings in the world, remembering that they and we are all human, that nothing human is alien to us, the foul and the fair, and that most important of all we’re here for a mere blink of the eyes, that’s all.’ And that is what the season of autumn reminds me of most: hope. It is a season of both endings and beginnings, it is a season of death and decay but it also bursts with color and reminds us to hold on. Winter is coming and we need to hold our inner warmth to get through and, as Smith shows us here, the connections we have with others is the greatest of warmths. ‘We have to hope that the people who love us and who know us a little bit will in the end have seen us truly. In the end, not much else matters.’ Autumn is a powerful little book, so alive in prose that often feels like it is riffing, so deep in emotions that creep across the page so quietly, and so full of hope and heartfelt joy even in moments of bleakness. I’ve been meaning to read this for a few years and am glad I did it during the titular season, reading it while on a trip through Atlanta all alive in colorful leaves and the warm yet crisp weather of early November. This was an experience of a novel that dug deep in me and Ali Smith is an incredible writer. Once the season turns, I am eager to read the next book. 5/5 ‘There's always, there'll always be, more story. That's what story is...It's the never-ending leaf-fall.’ ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 19, 2023
|
Nov 19, 2023
|
Nov 19, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0593535952
| 9780593535950
| 0593535952
| 4.40
| 135
| unknown
| Sep 12, 2023
|
it was amazing
|
‘Softly, calmly, immensity taps at your life.’ With quiet precision and vastness of grace, Jane Hirshfield crafts profound and empathetic poetic explor ‘Softly, calmly, immensity taps at your life.’ With quiet precision and vastness of grace, Jane Hirshfield crafts profound and empathetic poetic explorations of life amongst the natural world and the metaphysical questions of existence. A new Hirshfield poem is always cause for celebration, and with The Asking: New & Selected we not only get a new batch of gorgeous poetry but also a much needed selected volume from across Hirshfield’s prestigious career. Hirshfield is easily one of my favorite living poets, once praised by the late, great W.S. Merwin for her ability to make words ‘move like light beams-searching, discovering, pausing to make sure,’ and her poems offer such intricate and tidy philosophical insights that they often leave you awash in their beauty for years to come. This volume offers the best from across nine volumes of poetry (her most recent being Ledger in 2020) and many new poems such as the one from which the collection takes it’s title saying ‘don’t despair of this falling world, not yet / didn’t it give you the asking.’ Such statements are the heart of her works, addressing the dualities of life where ‘one's gain is not the other lessened,’ facing the inevitability of death and embracing our temporality in this world teeming with plant and animal life, asking us not to despair yet making space for sadness and grief as much as joy and tenderness. ‘A thought is a forest’ that comes alive through her words that reach, like tree branches, into the reader’s soul. This is a perfect collection for those looking for an introduction to this amazing poet and a lovely reminder of her entire career with plenty new to find for long-time readers, but either way it is a celebration of a poet that has always been dear to my heart. The Weighing The heart's reasons seen clearly, even the hardest will carry its whip-marks and sadness and must be forgiven. As the drought-starved eland forgives the drought-starved lion who finally takes her, enters willingly then the life she cannot refuse, and is lion, is fed, and does not remember the other. So few grains of happiness measured against all the dark and still the scales balance. The world asks of us only the strength we have and we give it. Then it asks more, and we give it. ‘Poetry is the language that foments revolutions of being,’ says Jane Hirshfield and it is because ‘it is based on a thoroughly lived life.’ I find reading her poetry to be like looking at the world anew, discovering mysteries I’d not known existed before and finding deeper understanding of those already pressing. Nobel Laureate Czesław Miłosz wrote that ‘her poetry illuminates the Buddhist virtue of mindfulness,’ which is a perfect summation. Hirshfield spent 8 years of study at the San Francisco Zen Center and this comes across through her prose as the surface simplicity of her work sends our minds into a deeper harmonization with life in a way that is unbelievably inviting and comforting even in the darker moments. As she writes in her poem , ‘to be that porous, to have such largeness pass / through me, is a feeling we as the reader experience engaging with her work. Her work often looks at ideas of duality, such as life and death, and this comes across brilliantly with much of her clever wordplay. For instance, in the poem she writes ‘There is something that waits inside us, / a nearness that fissures, that fishes,’ though I also just find so many of her phrasings to lodge themselves forever in my mind. The lines ‘A day is vast./ Until noon./ Then it's over.’ lives rent free in my head every time I wake up early and hope to get a lot accomplished before noon. Door and Sentence My life, you were a door I was given to walk through. Dawdling in lintel and loosestrife as much as permitted. Your own glass knob, I spoke you: A sentence, however often rewritten, ending always with the same slightly rusty-hinged preposition, sometimes, for mercy, hidden. Hirshfield has written as many essays on poetry as she has poems its seems, and I often find her insights there to be just as stunning. In a Hirshfield discusses how, for her, poetry is ‘an attempt to see from more than one point of view in more than one way, to enlist the collaboration of tongue, heart, mind, body, everything I have ever experienced, and to try to write into an awareness which is larger than the everyday, walking around forms of thought.’ I find this quite lovely. She continues that poetry is not ‘anger towards certain decisions which are made in the halls of power,’ but quite the opposite. ‘Poetry is the attempt to understand fully what is real, what is present, what is it imaginable, what is feelable, and how can I loosen the grip of what I already know to find some new, changed relationship, to find something I didn’t know until the poem was written and finished? And then I know something new, and I have been changed.…poems are vessels of transformation. They are the glass crucible that a chemical reaction takes place in. And what comes out at the end is a different thing than what went in at the beginning.’ I think we feel this way when we read her for sure, finding ourselves transformed and seeing the world in new ways. Ripeness Ripeness is what falls away with ease. Not only the heavy apple, the pear, but also the dried brown strands of autumn iris from their core. To let your body love this world that gave itself to your care in all of its ripeness, with ease, and will take itself from you in equal ripeness and ease, is also harvest. And however sharply you are tested — this sorrow, that great love — it too will leave on that clean knife. Life and death, naturally, become the biggest stage for transformation in her works. She writes about death in a way that reminds us how natural it is, being less something to be feared and more just another stage we all encounter. A favorite of mine is the poem which concludes with a passage comparing our lives vanishing into death like deer passing in a field. Here are the final two stanzas: Beloved, what can be, what was, will be taken from us. I have disappointed. I am sorry. I knew no better. A root seeks water. Tenderness only breaks open the earth. This morning, out the window, the deer stood like a blessing, then vanished. Hirshfield often plays with ying-and-yang dualities, or contrasting yet complimentary ideas such as the house growing either cluttered or sparse, being both empty and filled, or, as in ’Nothing Lasts’: ‘Grief and hope / the skipping rope’s two ends’, these two ideas having their interplay at the heart of her work. In these dualities we are reminded that much of life is what we make of it, or as she says in One will feel this as a blessing, another as horror’. There is the grief that she--we all--disappoint others, and the inevitability that everything will be taken from us. But, as common with Hirshfield, this doesn’t lead to despair but rather an acceptance of temporality that is beautifully embedded in the image of a deer seen out the window. It Was Like This: You Were Happy It was like this: you were happy, then you were sad, then happy again, then not. It went on. You were innocent or you were guilty. Actions were taken, or not. At times you spoke, at other times you were silent. Mostly, it seems you were silent—what could you say? Now it is almost over. Like a lover, your life bends down and kisses your life. It does this not in forgiveness— between you, there is nothing to forgive— but with the simple nod of a baker at the moment he sees the bread is finished with transformation. Eating, too, is a thing now only for others. It doesn’t matter what they will make of you or your days: they will be wrong, they will miss the wrong woman, miss the wrong man, all the stories they tell will be tales of their own invention. Your story was this: you were happy, then you were sad, you slept, you awakened. Sometimes you ate roasted chestnuts, sometimes persimmons. In her later poems, particularly the collection Ledger, we begin to see her investigations of death become more personal in an look at accepting that one day she must ‘walk into the time that is coming’ because ‘a great darkness is coming / a both eyed darkness’ of our inevitable deaths. ‘Little soul, / the book of your hours / is closing.’ She discusses in that writing this collection also made her aware the environmental concerns that permeate her poetry was also becoming more dire. ‘ I had been writing about climate for a long time. I had been writing about the imperiled natural world for a long time. But it became urgent when it became clear it was no longer future. It was here. ’ We see this increased intensity in this collection, which fits with the poems about death and more political matters to make for a rather haunting read. Let Them Not Say Let them not say: we did not see it. We saw. Let them not say: we did not hear it. We heard. Let them not say: they did not taste it. We ate, we trembled. Let them not say: it was not spoken, not written. We spoke, we witnessed with voices and hands. Let them not say: they did nothing. We did not-enough. Let them say, as they must say something: A kerosene beauty. It burned. Let them say we warmed ourselves by it, read by its light, praised, and it burned. The new poems to be found in this collection are wonderful as well (the poem earlier, Door and Sentence is from the new works) and have a rather optimistic flair to them. We have poems of the Solstice, being out in nature, a day that seems worth living if all one did was save a single ant, and even a poem to late poet Adam Zagajewski. Hirshfield has been publishing since 1971 and has only gotten better. ‘I would like to add to my life, while we are still living, a little salt and butter, one more slice of the edible apple, a teaspoon of jam from the long-simmered fig. To taste as if something tasted for the first time what we will have become then’ I cannot express how wonderful The Asking: New & Selected is, how joyous it is to hold a career of such beauty and power in one binding along with new gems to enjoy. I must simply recommend trying it for yourself, to bask in the glow of her words and get lost in the forests of her thoughts. It is a marvelous place to be. 5/5 Optimism More and more I have come to admire resilience. Not the simple resistance of a pillow, whose foam returns over and over to the same shape, but the sinuous tenacity of a tree: finding the light newly blocked on one side, it turns in another. A blind intelligence, true. But out of such persistence arose turtles, rivers, mitochondria, fias. all this resinous, unretractable earth. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Sep 12, 2023
|
Sep 12, 2023
|
Sep 12, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0857308416
| 9780857308412
| 0857308416
| 4.31
| 27,754
| Jun 22, 2023
| Jun 22, 2023
|
it was amazing
|
A masterpiece of a debut! The passion and power of first love can rattle loose the bolts of one's heart and rebuild it into a shape that forever bears A masterpiece of a debut! The passion and power of first love can rattle loose the bolts of one's heart and rebuild it into a shape that forever bears the signatures and scars from its formative experience. Such can be said of my own heart from Chloe Michelle Howarth’s searingly gorgeous sapphic novel, Sunburn, which has practically reprogramed my heartbeat to its poetic rhythms. ‘Now is the time between birth and slaughter’ begins this breathtaking bildungsroman that takes intimate investigations on the multitudes of change felt at the cusp of adulthood to show how they become milestones of the self in this interim between the cradle and grave. It is a story of Lucy and her awakening desires for Susannah, a desire so great she feels her body cannot possibly contain it, yet in the face of an unwelcoming society that feeds on rumors and castigations she feels her desire is shameful and contorts from happiness to fit the image others want for her. It is also a story of shifting dynamics between friends and family as ‘things fall apart when you grow up.’ Sunburns reads in a blaze of poetic glory fueled by intense and introspective prose that captures adolescent anxiety overcome by emotion across a narrative of being ‘pulled in two very different directions,’ of love in conflict with one’s community and the strength required to walk away from shame into self-actualization. ‘Since I have known her, Susannah has been a flame in bloom. She took me from ash and made me human. I fear if she spends one more day in the garden, her flame will dwindle, and to ash I will return.’ This book skyrocketed to my “favorites” shelf. I really enjoyed buddy reading this one with Liv (you should definitely read their incredible review here) and discussing it along the way. Set in rural Ireland in the early 90’s, Sunburn follows Lucy between the ages of 15 to 20, pulling us along her internal monologues as she tries to ride the currents of her own emotions while fearing she will dash upon the rocks of public image and ostracization. Her focus, growing into an obsession and outpouring of love, is always Susannah. ‘The way that Lucy feels about Susannah is the book, ’ Haworth explains in and we experience Lucy process major moments of growth over the years in relation to her love for Susannah. It begins in trepidation, realizing ‘I am reading deeper into her unconscious movements,’ but initially completely unable to recognize what she is feeling is a crush. Its adorable. The two begin to grow closer and closer through their teenage years and eventually reveal their shared desires for one another, unleashing a universe of passion and new concerns that carry the second half of the novel. ‘Another girl like me exists, and she is the most perfect girl in the world. The awful deed is done, our perfect love comes to life. I am hers, and she is mine.’ Chloe Michelle Howarth’s prose really sends the novel on an emotional roller coaster that made this not only one of the most underlined books I’ve read in years but also one that shook my heart and soul so gloriously that it was probably detectable on a seismograph. Howarth seizes upon teenage angst and over-dramatic flair as an opportunity to push her prose into ecstatic expressions. You get some killer lines like ‘hate me if you want to hate me, I’d love the attention,’ that make me love this book even more, but also Howarth teases that, despite there being some really sharp symbolism in the book, Lucy’s mind often overanalyzes everything in a really relatable way. ‘Tonight I find myself looking for her scent in the air, her touch in the pillowcase. It’s a strain to find meaning where there is none. It’s such a teenaged thing to do, why can I not stop doing it? Not everything is a symbol. Sometimes the world is plain and obvious. Sometimes the things I feel and the things I want don’t matter.’ BEEN THERE. Though this is not language Lucy can vocalize so much of her outpourings for Susannah arrive in the form of letters, adding another wonderful dynamic to the narrative but also nudging a primary theme about hiding desire. ‘And although we go far to escape them, at one time or another, we must return to Crossmore. To the roots of ourselves.’ The rural Irish setting is key to the novel and to Howarth’s heart, with Crossmore and the visual landscape reflecting her own natural surroundings. ‘I wanted it to be really unapologetically Irish, with Irish names and such,’ Howarth said in the , ‘I wouldn’t have enjoyed writing something that didn’t include that’ There is a connection with nature and the way ‘the days drip by as slow as half-melted candle wax,’ could also be applied to the slow but sensory pacing of the novel that really helps you feel like you inhabit the space alongside the characters. Add to this the ways that emotions and the seasons are often intertwined (or, as Liv points out, the way light reflects the state of Susannah), with summer being the season of outpourings of passion: ‘The Summer has been just a little bit too warm, the sun has been a little too bright. My thoughts have been a little bit too uncontrollable. And my emotions a little too humid. They only grow more humid. It all just gets stickier. Soon I think I will be unable to go even one day without lying on the grass with her.’ Much of the novel takes place in 1992, which is one year before Ireland would (later in 2015 Ireland was the as well as allow trans people to ) and in a rural community where the idea of “traditional values” reign supreme. It is a place where ‘motherhood is the nearest thing to an inherited career that I can hope for,’ and people are kept in line by rumours and outcast for being different. ‘Nasty rumours, which are scarcely confirmed and forever remembered…This is not a forgiving place. The fear of it takes me over. It takes us all over. We all have secrets, everybody is hiding something.’ Susannah and Lucy have different reactions to these sorts of rumors with Susannah already implicated due to the split of her wealthy parents and a mother that runs around with men. ‘I fear that Crossmore is too deep in me, and I would not know how to exist elsewhere,’ Lucy worries, and this fear along with losing her mother’s love if she were to openly admit she is a lesbian, become a rift between Susannah and her. ‘With or without me, she will go on blooming, she will always be a glorious thing. I would rather lose everything than lose her. I realise this too late…’ In many ways Sunburn is about choices that define identities with the choice between Susannah and Crossmore in general a major struggle for teenage Lucy. Before Susannah, Lucy struggles to understand herself and uncertain why she can’t feel anything for boys like Martin the way she thinks she should. Once she enters a relationship with Susannah, however, Lucy feels her true self, feels purpose, feels pulsating with desire to live and dream. ‘At last, I am defined. All my lonely days were not wasted, they led me to this most perfect union, this weaving of our two souls. The parts of me that were once afraid can no longer be found.Perhaps they will come back to terrify me again, but for now, I can’t feel them. For now, I allow myself to be wanted by her.’ She also feels a validated sense of self worth. ‘All along I thought Susannah was like a god,’ she muses, having obsessed over her for years, ‘now I kind of feel like a god too,’ or that they ‘are equal parts.’ There is the aspect that she feels validated but, like every aspect of this book, it is viewed in context with—and because of—Susannah. ‘ I live in a body that has loved her and I see with eyes that have witnessed her. She is part of my muscles, my tissue, she is unforgettable.’ Susannah gives her meaning she didn’t know she had before. But while ‘neither of us wants to be a cousin that the village isn’t supposed to know about,’ Susannah wants to be able to be openly a couple while Lucy fears the social repercussions. ‘Even with all the love that I have for her, I’m not ready to be out. Not yet. I’m just somebody in love with Susannah. That’s enough.’ Lucy wants it all, Crossmore and Susannah, and neither to define her. ‘I always thought a place like Crossmore would kill a person like me, but I realise now that places like Crossmore are made for people like me. There is space for me, for us, out on the edges, among the ruins and the hedges and the stone walls. These things are immovable. They belong to the world and cannot be altered. I hope that Susannah and I are like these things.I carve our initials into trees and scratch them onto rocks, hoping that a piece of us will remain in the landscape.’ However, we see this isn’t the case. When Lucy allows Crossmore and the opinions of others to define her, it is a feeling of shame, sin, and falseness. ‘I pretend so well I almost believe myself,’ she says. When they are caught together she thinks ‘heaven is fractured; Susannah and I are among you now, all you awful sinners,’ and even later still clings to the idea that ‘to be with her is a sin,’ until Evelyn finally tells her ‘Girl, there’s no such thing as sin.’ Which returns to the idea of Susannah as a god figure, because in Crossmore we are also reminded of the deep Catholic hold on rural Ireland. ‘Never in all my years of Christianity has there been talk of an angel like this.’ I can’t help but mention Sister Michael from admitting “I do love a good statue” as a jest at how much iconography permeates Catholicism, which is also present in Lucy’s veneration of Susannah. There is a lot of religious symbolism in her imagery of Susannah (burning fire for instance) and the worship comes interlaced with guilt and sin. It is a really incisive linguistic tell of her Catholicism and how her desire for Susannah is both viewed as a move towards something holy but also fearful as a fall from grace. Having been raised in the Catholic church and being close with ex-christian queer peers, trust me, this is totally a thing. ‘All I’ve done is fall for Susannah. It is not shameful or radical or wild. Anybody would fall for Susannah. I never meant to upset anybody.’ This book is a burning indictment on the harms caused from homophobia. All Lucy and Susannah wanted was love. To be able to be, say, go to a dance together without it being a scandal. To simply exist in the world together without it being turned into a whole thing to give the rumor or hatemongers something to rage about to fill the voids in their life. ‘‘My love now seems to be an aggressive, political thing. It is the ceaseless search for an identity and then committing to that identity. It is a fight to exist in my own home. Is that not exhausting? Is it worth it? It feels like the good parts of loving have been thrown on the backseat and forgotten about.’ Among the harshest aspects are the ways those who claim to love her react. ‘To Mother, I am no longer Lucy,’ she thinks as her mother ignores her and refuses to feed her (Liv makes a brilliant point that food is used symbolically for love in the novel, from withholding it to Martin’s lumpy and cold meals reflective of her inability to truly love him). ‘If everybody loved me as much as they claim to, I don’t think I would be in this position, back and forth between them like a pendulum, always stuck between her and everything else in the world. I am so sick I could scream.’ Mothers figures are a key theme to the novel, with Lucy seeing how Susannah wilts when her mother leaves and fears the same for herself if she does not lie about her true self to regain her mother’s approval. ‘Either I can be who Mother expects me to be, or I can be whoever I want to be. Each seems as treacherous as the other. I will find myself, soon, I just need to stop acting my age and grow up.’ And life changes are coming at her fast. ‘The life that I know will morph out of shape. The girls will be far away. I will be somebody different. I am grown, and yet I have never felt so young.’ Though this attempt to be what her mother wants instead of herself causes her to analyze every aspect of her life during one of lifes biggest moments of transitions: graduating school and moving beyond the gates of adolescence. Sunburn so eloquently captures that feeling of excitement yet also sadness during moments of big change and makes it felt so deeply I was right back at 18 watching friendships being packed into boxes as we dispersed around the country. ‘Something has changed. We are not the people that we used to be,’ Lucy observes, and this seeps into every relationship she knows. Especially Martin, who was a friendship so easy but now under the context of dating to appease her mother everything feels fragile and timid. ‘Being in his company has become so loaded. Now that he thinks I am almost his girlfriend, it’s like I am no longer his friend…Our boundaries, our language, our movements, they must all be monitored, I must bend over backwards to stop from hurting or arousing his feelings.’ Martin is a really endearing character and Howarth does an excellent job setting up the major life choice between Martin and a life with Susannah—or at least a life embracing her sexuality—by having Martin be a perfect choice on all fronts all except for her sexuality. He ‘is so kind and caring and offers a secure future,’ her family approves, society approves, but she can never truly love him. Will she find that this element of love is more important than hiding behind a socially acceptable mask? ‘These days all anyone wants to talk about is what is going to happen next, so much so that nobody cares about what’s happening now. All Susannah wants to do is run away, and all Martin wants to do is settle down, and I realise that I’ve only ever thought of ways to keep everyone happy, so I have no idea what I want’ This becomes the big lesson of the novel. ‘I can have her, she says, but it has to be all of her, and it has to be honest, and it has to be now,’ yet can she walk away from the people of her life, from Crossmore, to embrace this? ‘We live with our eyes closed, Susannah and her money, Martin and his land, and me, without the confidence or ability to do anything on my own,’ she thinks, and we see how she is often guided by a mother figure because of her inability to stand for herself. Though it is the mothers who hurt her the most, even Maria, the mother figure of her friend group, who will later betray Lucy’s secrets. ‘If you’d lose them over this, then maybe you never had them at all,’ Susannah advises. A harsh truth, but a difficult one to embrace. ‘There are so many people in the real world, Lucy. Not everybody is your mother. Not everybody wants to get married off and live on a farm. People would love you the way you are, we just need to find those people’ I could honestly go on about this novel for pages and pages. Sunburn is a towering achievement of queer fiction, of coming-of-age stories, of poetic expression, of just simply being a deeply moving novel. It captures so many specific feelings of riding the tide from childhood into adulthood as the maelstrom of desires, ego, and self-conscious investigations rains down. ‘Sweet Susannah, where I am a burnt-out star, you are the sun,’ says Lucy, and here I sit looking at this novel as if it, too, is the sun. Startlingly gorgeous and nuanced, this is a masterpiece of a debut novel from Chloe Michelle Howarth. It will burn you in its brilliant blaze of passion, and you will be better for it. 5/5 ‘Susannah is the place where I belong. This is Heaven, this is all I want.’ ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Feb 07, 2024
|
Mar 12, 2024
|
Jul 22, 2023
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0399563245
| 9780399563249
| 0399563245
| 4.57
| 25,850
| Oct 10, 2017
| Oct 10, 2017
|
it was amazing
|
‘A lifetime isn't long enough for the beauty of this world and the responsibilities of your life.’ An absolute icon of modern poetry. Once called the ‘in ‘A lifetime isn't long enough for the beauty of this world and the responsibilities of your life.’ An absolute icon of modern poetry. Once called the ‘indefatigable guide to the natural world,’ by Maxine Kumin, winner of both the Pulitzer and National Book Award, one of the bestselling and best-loved US poets of all-time, Mary Oliver is an undeniable gem of poetry. With a style that is as accessible as it is ponderous and moving, Oliver’s poetry elegantly examines life from the thin barrier between human and wild animal, our companionship with the world, to the confrontation and acceptance of darkness. Her words capture our finite existence in all its wonders and beauty where even ‘a box full of darkness’ can be understood ‘that this, too, was a gift.’ I’ve been reading Oliver for years and every time I think I’ve exhausted her collections for poems that nearly knock me to the floor I discover another and its like the sky opening up and all of the cosmos raining down into my heart. She’s absolutely perfect. Those looking for an in-depth and expansive look at her works should certainly turn to Devotions, a selected poems spanning her entire career from her first collection, No Voyage and Other Poems, published in 1963 when Oliver was only 28, to her final book in 2015, Felicity. Though Oliver passed in 2019 at the age of 83, her poetry will live on and I suspect that as long as poems are being read, she will be a name remembered for generations to come. Don’t Hesitate If you suddenly and unexpectedly feel joy, don’t hesitate. Give in to it. There are plenty of lives and whole towns destroyed or about to be. We are not wise, and not very often kind. And much can never be redeemed. Still, life has some possibility left. Perhaps this is its way of fighting back, that sometimes something happens better than all the riches or power in the world. It could be anything, but very likely you notice it in the instant when love begins. Anyway, that’s often the case. Anyway, whatever it is, don’t be afraid of its plenty. Joy is not made to be a crumb. There is magic enough in this world if we just remember to look. ‘Imagination is better than a sharp instrument,’ Mary Oliver says, reminding us, ‘to pay attention, this is our endless and proper work.’ Often we just need to step outside of ourselves a moment to see the world anew. Oliver reminds us what it is to be human in the most tender of ways and grants an empowering universiality to her work that makes us feel in communion with the world and one another in a manner that makes you glad to be alive, breathing this air, able to read her words. Take this poem for instance, from A Thousand Mornings: Poems: Poem of the One World This morning the beautiful white heron was floating along above the water and then into the sky of this the one world we all belong to where everything sooner or later is a part of everything else which thought made me feel for a little while quite beautiful myself. Like the final lines state, to read a beautiful Mary Oliver is to feel beautiful oneself. To take those words inside you and let them purify your weary heart, dry your tears, remind you that even when you are miserable and wondering what to do, there is still work to be done and you can rise to the challenge. And what do I risk to tell you this, which is all I know? Love yourself. Then forget it. Then, love the world. Growing up in Ohio, Oliver that she ‘felt those first important connections, those first experiences being made with the natural world rather than with the social world.’ Perhaps for this reason much of her poetry uses the natural world as the lens through which she peers into the human heart and mind. At 17, Oliver would befriend Norma, the sister to poet Edna St. Vincent Millay, and spend most of a decade organizing St. Vincent Millay’s papers while working for her estate. She attended Ohio State University and Vassar College without finishing a degree, but once her first collection of poetry came out her career as a poet was well under way and she would later teach while working as a poet-in residence at several colleges before finishing her career as Chair for Distinguished Teaching at Bennington College. Her collections are also highly decorated, winning the Pulitzer Prize for American Primitive as well as the National Book Award for New and Selected Poems While at the St. Vincent Millay estate she would meet , who would become her life-long partner as well as agent until Molly passed in 2005. Molly had previously owned a bookstore where she employed a young before he became a celebrated filmmaker and the couple maintained a friendship with him for the remainder of their lives. Though my favorite anecdote is that, while working as Mary’s agent, whenever a call came in for her, Molly would just pretend to be her on the phone and eventually editors just came to accept her as the same as actually speaking to Mary. Molly and Mary I Did Think, Let’s Go About This Slowly: I did think, lets go about this slowly. This is important, this should take some really deep thought. We should take small thoughtful steps. But, bless us, we didn’t. ‘I got saved by poetry, and I got saved by the beauty of the world,’ Oliver said in an , and the act of looking into the world to find inspiration for poetry was what led her to the world that saved her. And it can save us too if we remember to look and be mindful (of this Oliver writes that she would like ‘people to remember of me how inexhaustible was her mindfulness’). And poetry can help awaken that. ‘As for the poem,’ she writes, ‘not this poem but any / poem, do you feel its sting? Do you feel / its hope, its entrance to a community? Do / you feel its hand in your hand?’ If our hearts are open, poetry can move us, and poetry helps us communicate. With the author, with each other, with the world. Poetry, Oliver says in the interview, is ‘ very sacred. It wishes for a community — it’s a community ritual, certainly,’ And, as she think of Marc’s painting, it can help make the world kinder if we remember to make something beautiful in order to share it. ‘And that’s why, when you write a poem, you write it for anybody and everybody. And you have to be ready to do that out of your single self. It’s a giving. It’s always — it’s a gift. It’s a gift to yourself, but it’s a gift to anybody who has a hunger for it.’ Oliver has always made poetry seem like a sacred act, like a prayer, and here, writing near the end of her life, we can see her reflect on how much poetry has been as much a blessing to her as it is to us, her readers. to live in this world you must be able to do three things to love what is mortal; to hold it against your bones knowing your own life depends on it; and, when the time comes to let it go, to let it go —From, Part of what has retained Mary Oliver’s popularity is she is so endlessly quotable and her numerous, beloved one-liners come from poems so good its almost a shame to highlight them without the full thing. Social media is full of her little nuggets of brilliance, such as (read full poems in links) ‘Listen – are you breathing just a little, and calling it a life?’ (from Have You Ever Tried to Enter the Long Black Branches? ), ‘You only have to let / the soft animal of your body / love what it loves,’ (from ), ‘it is a serious thing just to be alive on this fresh morning in the broken world,’ (from ) or slightly longer quotes such as: ‘Instructions for living a life: Pay attention. Be astonished. Tell about it.’ (from ) Though easily her best known quote is ‘Tell me, what is it you plan to do / with your one wild and precious life?’ which makes for perfect closing lines to . While often quoted without the full poem used as an inspirational message, what I love best about this line is that—in context—Oliver has already answered what she would do and that is to walk in the woods. Actually, it is such an amazing poem here is the whole thing: Who made the world? Who made the swan, and the black bear? Who made the grasshopper? This grasshopper, I mean— the one who has flung herself out of the grass, the one who is eating sugar out of my hand, who is moving her jaws back and forth instead of up and down— who is gazing around with her enormous and complicated eyes. Now she lifts her pale forearms and thoroughly washes her face. Now she snaps her wings open, and floats away. I don't know exactly what a prayer is. I do know how to pay attention, how to fall down into the grass, how to kneel down in the grass, how to be idle and blessed, how to stroll through the fields, which is what I have been doing all day. Tell me, what else should I have done? Doesn't everything die at last, and too soon? Tell me, what is it you plan to do with your one wild and precious life? That all is such a perfect expression of what Oliver’s poetry is like. ‘Welcome to the silly, comforting poem,’ Oliver begins her poem which, oddly enough, is also perfect because her poems are SO comforting and uplifting. Even when she is talking about death, which she can manage in a way only Jane Hirshfield can do. Oliver’s prose borders on religious experience without ever being actually religious, or as Alicia Ostriker once wrote, Oliver is ‘among the few American poets who can describe and transmit ecstasy, while retaining a practical awareness of the world as one of predators and prey,’ as well as referring to her as equal to Ralph Waldo Emerson. Mornings at Blackwater For years, every morning, I drank from Blackwater Pond. It was flavored with oak leaves and also, no doubt, the feet of ducks. And always it assuaged me from the dry bowl of the very far past. What I want to say is that the past is the past, and the present is what your life is, and you are capable of choosing what that will be, darling citizen. So come to the pond, or the river of your imagination, or the harbor of your longing, and put your lips to the world. And live your life. The poems are most often calm and thoughtful, echoing a serenity of nature and gazing in wonderment at the marvelous possibilities of existence. Even in poems such as The Kitten, which deals with burning a stillborn kitten, she writes ‘life is infinitely inventive, / saying, what other amazements / lie in the dark seed of the earth…’ When we read Oliver, we see life as alive with beauty and are better for it. I want to think again of dangerous and noble things. I want to be light and frolicsome. I want to be improbable beautiful and afraid of nothing, as though I had wings. —From What also helps make Oliver so popular is her accessibility, something she achieves through a directness without sacrificing depth or lacking in breathtaking poetic phrasing. She is a perfect poet to pass to someone looking for an entryway into the world of poetry, and her focus on life as seen through nature is always easy to identify with. Though her poems are not always nature oriented, and Oliver’s directness can be sharpened to cut as well. Such as this one: Of The Empire We will be known as a culture that feared death and adored power, that tried to vanquish insecurity for the few and cared little for the penury of the many. We will be known as a culture that taught and rewarded the amassing of things, that spoke little if at all about the quality of life for people (other people), for dogs, for rivers. All the world, in our eyes, they will say, was a commodity. And they will say that this structure was held together politically, which it was, and they will say also that our politics was no more than an apparatus to accommodate the feelings of the heart, and that the heart, in those days, was small, and hard, and full of meanness. ‘Keep some room in your heart for the unimaginable,’ Oliver wrote, and her poetry is a perfect tool for ensuring that space is kept open. To read Oliver is to approach what must be what some call ‘the Divine,’ and I’ve never once regretted picking up a volume of hers to read. Even her collection all about dogs is nothing but sheer bliss pouring into your heart. It was tragic to lose her in 2019, right around the same time another giant of modern US poetry who also excelled at poetry harnessing the natural word, W.S. Merwin, passed but her words certainly outlive her and most likely even you and I. In her poem , Oliver writes: ‘When it's over, I want to say all my life I was a bride married to amazement. I was the bridegroom, taking the world into my arms. When it's over, I don't want to wonder if I have made of my life something particular, and real. I don't want to find myself sighing and frightened, or full of argument. I don't want to end up simply having visited this world’ I’d like to believe she achieved this and if her poetry is any testament to a life lived, then it was a life well lived. If you haven’t read Mary Oliver before, definitely do so as soon as possible. Even those who don’t usually read poetry tend to love her. Mary Oliver achieved great popularity but also great depth of heart and will live on as one of the greats of our time. 5/5 Wild Geese You do not have to be good. You do not have to walk on your knees for a hundred miles through the desert repenting. You only have to let the soft animal of your body love what it loves. Tell me about despair, yours, and I will tell you mine. Meanwhile the world goes on. Meanwhile the sun and the clear pebbles of the rain are moving across the landscapes, over the prairies and the deep trees, the mountains and the rivers. Meanwhile the wild geese, high in the clean blue air, are heading home again. Whoever you are, no matter how lonely, the world offers itself to your imagination, calls to you like the wild geese, harsh and exciting - over and over announcing your place in the family of things. Journey One day you finally knew what you had to do, and began, though the voices around you kept shouting their bad advice -- though the whole house began to tremble and you felt the old tug at your ankles. "Mend my life!" each voice cried. But you didn't stop. You knew what you had to do, though the wind pried with its stiff fingers at the very foundations, though their melancholy was terrible. It was already late enough, and a wild night, and the road full of fallen branches and stones. But little by little, as you left their voice behind, the stars began to burn through the sheets of clouds, and there was a new voice which you slowly recognized as your own, that kept you company as you strode deeper and deeper into the world, determined to do the only thing you could do -- determined to save the only life that you could save. Crazy Little Love Song I don’t want eventual, I want soon. It’s 5 a.m. It’s noon. It’s dusk falling to dark. I listen to music. I eat up a few wild poems while time creeps along as though it’s got all day. This is what I have. The dull hangover of waiting, the blush of my heart on the damp grass, the flower-faced moon. A gull broods on the shore where a moment ago there were two. Softly my right hand fondles my left hand as though it were you. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
not set
|
not set
|
Jun 06, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
B00ZP64F28
| 4.17
| 174,047
| Jul 29, 2014
| Aug 18, 2015
|
it was amazing
|
‘The universe is what we make of it. It’s up to you to decide what part you will play.’ This book left me speechless, and with some tears. I love this ‘The universe is what we make of it. It’s up to you to decide what part you will play.’ This book left me speechless, and with some tears. I love this book with my whole heart. I imagine reading A Long Way to a Small Angry Planet, the debut novel from Becky Chambers, to be what it is to a dog when they get a really good belly rub. You know, the kind where their leg is twitching and it just seems like pure bliss. Who hasn’t fantasized themselves in some fantastic future world, soaring amongst the stars with a headful of heroics? I spent many days as a kid wishing I could be part of these epic adventures. Chambers, offers such an opportunity aboard the ship The Wayfarer. The novel is practically an immersive experience in a sci-fi galaxy so well constructed and narrated that it feels very lived-in, and by the novels end you feel as if you are a part of the crew, having spent so much time amongst the endlessly lovable cast of characters. This is enhanced as, while most sci-fi epics put us with the elite heroes, the chosen few upon which the fate of a galaxy rests, Chambers lets us see how the average citizen of their Galactic Commons lives, loves, works and dreams. ‘The people we remember are the ones who decided how our maps should be drawn. Nobody remembers who built the roads,’ yet Chambers creates a blissful drama full of life aboard a ship that does just that: builds “roads” between planets across space. Often described as “cozy sci-fi”—an apt description if there is any—this first book of the Wayfarers plunges us into an exciting cosmos to live amongst the regular folks and look at how a universe of multiple species would feasibly coexist and is an excellent exploration on themes of cooperation, plurality, friendship, and identity while also a condemnation of war and power. In short, this book is a universe unto itself. In epic space films we often see entire ships or planets destroyed and just move along, death on such a large scale it becomes that Stalin quote about one death a tragedy, a million a statistic. Long Way to a Small Angry Planet zooms in to the individual level and shows how for the regular person caught up in these cosmic struggles just a single death could be a universe of grief. It brings us to the level of what goes on with the Red Shirts in Star Trek, the transport crews in Star Wars, the regular staff in Dune, a crew full of non-combatants just trying to live their life in the universe. I love this crew. I can’t help it after feeling their kinship, engaging with their struggles, and watching them learn and love with each other. We are brought aboard the Wayfarer along with Rosemary, a young woman with a new identity fleeing a mysterious past and welcomed in to their crew. I’d tell you about them all, but I’d rather you get to meet them for yourselves. It’s been a few days since I finished the book and I rather miss them, so say hello for me. ‘Perhaps the ache of homesickness was a fair price to pay for having so many good people in her life.’ What really grabs me about this book is the emphasis on how to make the universe work, even just aboard a ship staffed by a variety of different species. Details like Aandrisk-friendly cups to accommodate a lack of lips or other alterations and safety procedures for ease of access on ships for certain species, discussions on cultural or species differences or examples of interspecies frustrations due to them, and even a sort of sci-fi racism is present (the term “lizard” is a massive slur). Working a DEI committee for a library and often thinking on accommodation and equity I really enjoyed how much attention to these ideas Chambers includes as a brilliant way of making the world feel real and lived-in. Communication is key to much of this, such as language barriers and attempting to ‘not judge other species by your own social norms,’ even a interesting discussion on how the human language is biased against reptilian species (‘cold blooded’ having negative connotations, etc). ‘Feelings are relative. And at the root, they’re all the same, even if they grow from different experiences and exist on different scales.’ This applies to cultural aspects too, and Chambers includes exceptional drama with trying to decide the “right” thing to do when there is a clash in cultural beliefs. ‘This is so fucking Human of you,’ Captain Ashby is told at a critical moment, ‘Lie back and let the galaxy do whatever it wants, because you’re too guilty about how badly you fucked up your own species to ever take the initiative.’There are interesting discussions, such as Sissix finding it strange humans view a baby dying as more tragic than an adult (a baby has not accomplished anything while an adult has and has knowledge that could be passed on is the Aandrisk perspective), there is a species that finds taking anything more than you need to be not only wasteful but immoral, and the variations of sexuality and family structures is fascinating (Aandrisks have a “hatch-family” and a “feather-family” for instance, with the chosen family being more important than biological). It all makes for a great commentary on our own times and the need to accommodate plurality, something that is under political attack in the US from which Chambers wrote this novel. It is in the novel as well, with the uneasy alliance with the Toremi—a warmongering species thats inclusion into the Galactic Commons (GC) drives the main plot points—further frustrated by their rejection of plurality and belief in full consensus (they see the universe is complex patterns but reject multiple interpretations being allowed to co-exist). ‘You Humans really do cripple yourselves with your belief that you all think in unique ways.’ I enjoyed how it is mentioned Corbin, who is white, is a rarity and almost all humans are people of color which feels akin to the sci-fi futures of Ursula K. Le Guin who usually applies a wide racial cast and her lack of white people in the future is because ‘why wouldn’t they still be either a minority, or just swallowed up in the larger colored gene pool, in the future?.’ That is certainly present here, with other nods to Le Guin including the nod to the galactic communication device being called the “ansible,” a tech from her books. The humans here have come from our Earth, which is now unlivable due to human destruction and wars (I enjoyed the digs at cults like the highly xenophobic Gaiaists wanted to abandon the galaxy and return to Earth or the Survivalists who reject technology or vaccines wanting a human surpremacist society) but in this future amongst the stars they are fairly mediocre and not exactly highly respected. They are viewed as too emotional, weak and fragile, and there is a comedic moment when characters playing an old human game (chess) joke at how human games used to be about conquest but in the present the idea of humans being conquerors is laughable. ‘The only reason Humans stopped killing each other to the extent that you used to, I think, is because your planet died before you could finish the job,’ we are told. It is a good warning in a book largely about cooperation. ‘No good can come from a species at war with itself,’ Chambers writes, and this hits at a major theme in the novel. We have the humans, but also the tragic history of the Grum and why they are going extinct after years of developing more and more lethal technology to kill each other in horrific fashion in their wars. There is an excellent political narrative in this book and while it mostly exists in the background, the repercussions of it constantly arise and often harm the regular people just doing their jobs and living their lives despite it being so much larger and beyond them. ‘The thing is, a lot of laws are stupid, too, and they don't always keep people out of danger,’ we are told, and often we see how the politics of the galaxy is far more about feeding the powerful than protecting the people. Ownership of resources drives much of the politics and becomes an excellent commentary on our own global politics as it is the future’s politics. A rich person selling weapons to both sides of a war for personal gain (a narrative threaded through the newscasts) is decried as wrong and punished, but a government doing the same thing is “business as usual” and rewarded with power. And people die for these power struggles while being hardly a blip on the news. World building is a strong gift for Chambers and, like many Le Guin novels, this reads like a sociological exploration of a galaxy via a cozy narrative. It is incredibly well constructed and while she throws a multitude of in-world terms at you, she excels at putting them in contexts for you to learn them without having to explain them. By the end of the book what sounds like gibberish to an outsider is perfectly understandable to the reader. It is accomplished without much exposition either, having passages that are “historical texts” or essays that provide context and much of the explaining is done via conversations between regular people in the ways regular people would talk about events. It allows you to experience and learn on the ground level instead of being lectured, and it really works. You feel like you exist in their world, its quite impressive. The book is also rather episodic while following a fairly basic narrative forward, giving you cool windows of insight to the galaxy through short, contained narratives inside the larger one. This is a very character driven story and one in which discovering or being true to your identity while also being part of the larger world is a major theme. This can be tricky in a dangerous universe full of corruption. ‘You are capable of anything. Good or bad. You always have been, and you always will be. Given the right push, you, too, could do horrible things. That darkness exists within all of us.’ It is also about rising above all that, and doing the right thing. It is about exploring what it means to live and feel and coexist. Things are frightening but ‘scared means we want to live,’ as Kizzy says, and pushing on despite fear and struggles is key to being alive. What really drives the point home in a cool way is how two of the moments that most humanize the characters involves characters not considered “people” in the galaxy (like a clone, or an AI), and the biggest moment of grief allows for a tragic but beautiful look at love in a sci-fi future. ‘A black hole is a perfect place to contemplate death.’ Honestly I could go on and on about this book forever. It isn’t one for everyone, and if action or a strong plot is what you seek, perhaps look elsewhere. But for a gorgeous, lived-in universe full of fascinating characters and a look at how that would feasibly work, this is an absolute gem. It’s cozy, its comforting, its often hilarious and touching, but it also critiques society, war and the power structures that make war and societal suffering happen. We see how the average person is so small and fragile against the scope of political struggles of the rich and we see how it is the average person that becomes expendable pawns in their games. But most of all, we see how being alive is a joy when you can share it with others, even sharing pain and fear, and great things can happen when we try to work together. Love is the message here, and we have interspecies romantic love and familial love, both of which are necessary and good. It’s so charming. A Long Way to a Small Angry Planet was a burst of sunshine in my life, and I hated finishing it because I just want to sail the stars with that crew. Come aboard, there is much to see. 5/5 ‘You're Rosemary Harper. You chose that name because the old one didn't fit anymore. So you had to break a few laws to de it. Big fucking deal. Life isn't fair, and laws usually aren't, either. You did what you had to do.’ ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 11, 2023
|
May 07, 2023
|
Apr 11, 2023
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||||
4.08
| 2,068
| Oct 14, 2020
| Oct 08, 2020
|
it was amazing
| The Impending Blindness of Billie Scott is a Must-Read Did I stay up way too late reading this in one sitting as I could not put it down? YE The Impending Blindness of Billie Scott is a Must-Read Did I stay up way too late reading this in one sitting as I could not put it down? YEP. Is Zoe Thorogood the future of comics? Yea, probably? Weird question, sorry, why would I ask that. Oh, it’s because everything Thorogood does is so goddamn engrossing that I just want to shout about it to everyone. Which I have been doing at the bookstore anytime someone so much as glances at the graphic novel section. But for real, The Impending Blindness of Billie Scott from Zoe Thorogood is a delight. We follow runaway artist Billie who, on the cusp of their big break with a gallery showing, is the victim of random violence that leaves her going blind. With only weeks before her eyesight is gone, she sets out to make 10 portraits and keep her artistic dreams alive, facing the cruelty of living on the streets but having meaningful conversations and making lasting friends along the way. This is a moving story, with lots of ups and downs and emotional grit that really sinks its claws into you. Like the way a cat will climb up your leg and you think “ow!” but then “aw” because it snuggles up in your lap and you love cats. This book is like if that cat was art, all brought to life through Thorogood’s incredible artwork and humor. There is so much to love here. The characters are so endearing, and not just the socially anxious artist Billie who is so easy to love and empathize with, but this features some fantastic side characters like Arthur, determined to embrace the failures of his past and directing it towards help others, and of course Rachel West, unhoused but determined to become a music star and buy back the coffee shop her deceased dad once owned. I really appreciated the empathetic approach to unhoused people. This is a really empowering story with a lot of lovely things to say about art, determination, that your ‘work does not define you,’ and it is also a beautiful plea to keep creating. It is a moving look at the power of art juxtaposed with the hardships of life and a reminder that kindness and support helps those around you flourish. It also has such a cute story of friendship that blossoms into something more. Yay! The cast of characters via Billie Scott’s artwork But we need to talk about Thorogood’s art, because it is extraordinary. I love the muted palette here, with highlights of just dull reds, yellow and blue on ink drawings that have a really gritty vibe and brings the urban settings to life. Her character designs are wonderful, which is key for a book about painting portraits. I mean, this feels so much like existing in an artist’s mind and works, something you feel very aware of at all times in a good way. Thorogood has great dialogue too, and for a book that can have fairly text-heavy panels, it never feels like too much and larger, full-page cells make dynamic use of the space, directing your eyes to swirl down the page following the dialogue in a really creative and engaging way. It is also very self-conscious in a way that is effective and charming—this book has so much personality. I love the publication as an oversized book, it really lets you plunge into the artwork and just feels cool as hell to hold. Like, hell yes I’m reading this amazing graphic novel, and you should too. Plus she can break into some excellent surreal nightmares here, something that she captures quite well in her later book, It's Lonely at the Centre of the Earth . Creepy cool I can’t recommend The Impending Blindness of Billie Scott enough and was very impressed and moved by it. Sure, there’s probably some criticism to make but fuck that because this is just too great. I also highly recommend It's Lonely at the Centre of the Earth , which feels like a more matured art direction but not in a way where this doesn’t feel mature, that book just does magic with visual storytelling. Thorogood is spot of with pacing, the use of frames really pushes the story along but gives it room to breathe, and it is just a visual extravaganza. Read all the Thorogood, I’m very excited to follow her career. And, as Billie says ‘just create, never stop creating.’ 5/5 ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 15, 2023
|
Mar 15, 2023
|
Mar 15, 2023
|
Paperback
| ||||||||||||||||||
0547928289
| 9780547928289
| 0547928289
| 4.27
| 260
| Mar 26, 2013
| Mar 26, 2013
|
it was amazing
|
I was saddened to learn today of the passing of an absolute favorite poet, the great Charles Simic, at the age of 84. Born in Belgrade in 1938, Simic
I was saddened to learn today of the passing of an absolute favorite poet, the great Charles Simic, at the age of 84. Born in Belgrade in 1938, Simic arrived in the US in 1954 after having witnessed the horrors of WWII and would launch an impressive poetry career that would earn him a MacArthur Genius Grant, a Pulitzer Prize and a seat as the 15th US Poet Laureate in 2007. Charles Simic has always held an extremely important place in my heart, being the first poet to really enrapture me to the point that I simply had to try to write my own poetry, so enamored with the dexterity and abstract agency he granted to language through his own poetry. Not only was his poetry so irresistible to me, but his whole persona as a poet who taught and talked about poetry bolstered my love, particularly when he discussed his methods for poetry as being like a game of chess with words, or a line I quote often that a good poem is like a bank robbery: you get in, get attention, get the goods and get out fast. True to his teachings, Simic has always excelled in packing so much in a succinct package of poetry, being works you can read quickly but then spend the rest of the day unpacking in your mind; meaning hides in all the nooks and crannies of word choices and if you shake his poems and entire civilization of thought comes spilling out he pockets. Towards the end of his life—he passed from complications due to dementia—his poems began to move inward, growing shorter and shorter as if he had found the secret shortcut to fold a world of ideas into a few sparse lines. He is a perfect balance of thought-provoking depth and accessibility, and one of the first I always recommend for people looking for a start in poetry. Now, if you’ll bear with me, I’d like to dive through a lifetime of poems and a cosmos of beauty in tribute to an absolute favorite poet. ‘The secret ambition of all lyric poetry is to stop time,’ Simic wrote. While time could not be stopped and Simic has passed on, he has left a legacy of brilliance (he published over 30 books) and his words will live on through all those who read them. I left a significant amount of Simic quotes around on trees in my community as part of my . ‘Inside my empty bottle I was constructing a lighthouse While all the others Were making ships.’ Charles Simic once wrote that ‘a poem is a secret shared by people who have never met each other.’ I think of this often and the way a poem can be a lightning strike of emotion and meaning straight into the heart of the reader who looks back to the page to feel the poet nodding to them. ‘Everyone wants to explain the poem,’ say Simic, ‘except the poet,’ and I believe the perfect poem is designed to say something in a way that can’t fully be said otherwise—an essay on the meaning of a poem still can’t quite grasp the way the succinctness of a poem packs a world of ideas into a linguistic stab at the ineffable. To attempt to net reality in the faulty net of language. For me, Simic was the first to explain and demonstrate this and I will always be grateful for that. ‘Poetry is an orphan of silence,’ he wrote, ‘the words never quite equal the experience beneath them.’ I think it is the way his poetry leans into the surreal that enhances this effect, and the way a simple statement is often just the translucent lid on a container of ideas you can glean bustling about underneath. Simic leans into the abstract with imagery that traverses through the grit of world war and family history, illustrating scenes as if in sepia tones or photographs curling at the edges, and often bears the black and white vibes of noir aesthetics. These are poems that would feel at home read in back alleyways clouded with fog and cigarette smoke, or half drunk into a fading glass of bourbon. One of the first to ever jump out at me came from the collection Walking the Black Cat: CLUB MIDNIGHTt Are you the owner of a seedy night club? Are you its sole customer, sole bartender, Sole waiter prowling around the empty tables? Do you put on wee-hour girlie shows With dead stars of black and white films? Is your office upstairs over the neon lights, Or down deep in the dank rat cellar? Are bearded Russian thinkers your silent partners? Do you have a doorman by the name of Dostoyevsky? Is Fu Manchu coming tonight? Is Miss Emily Dickinson? Do you happen to have an immortal soul? Do you have a sneaky suspicion that you have none? Is that why you throw a white pair of dice, In the dark, long after the joint closes? Something about this shook me. The noir aspects, the seediness, the philosophical undertones of eternity and our finite space in it grasping at the history of literature for it’s immortality as we plunge forward in time. I was working at a Barnes and Noble in Holland after having uprooted my entire life and living in this new space where I knew nobody, and bonding over Simic poetry was one of the ways I met my friend Pete who became a very dear friend. So I have Simic to thank for that as well. Ah hell, this is supposed to be a review but to be frank, I’m drunk on gin because I just learned a hero of mine is gone and I’m gonna spew some random thoughts at all of you. Here is another poem I love and love to post every Labor Day on social media (from That Little Something but they are all found here in this Selected Poems): LABOR AND CAPITAL The softness of this motel bed On which we made love Demonstrates to me in an impressive manner The superiority of capitalism. At the mattress factory, l imagine, The employees are happy today. It's Sunday and they are working Extra hours, like us, for no pay. Still, the way you open your legs And reach for me with your hand Makes me think of the Revolution, Red banners, crowd charging. Someone stepping on a soapbox As the flames engulf the palace, And the old prince in full view Steps to his death from a balcony. Simic had a decorated career, winning the Pulitzer Prize for The World Doesn't End (a brilliant collection of prose poetry) and being the 15th US Poet Laureate. I’ve always been charmed by Simic having served in this role during the George W Bush administration and with the weight of this role having released Master of Disguises full of anti war poetry. I don’t know how apocryphal this is but supposedly he was supposed to do a reading in the White House Rose Garden but someone got wind of him planning on reading only anti-war poems and it was canceled. I choose to believe this and love this. Speaking of anti-war poems, I’ve always loved this one from Selected Early Poems where he even discards the heroes for the sake of peace, Simic who grew up in occupied Serbia during WWII which appears in many of his poems: MY WEARINESS OF EPIC PROPORTIONS I like it when Achilles Gets killed And even his buddy Patroclus- And that hothead Hector And the whole Greek and Trojan Jeunesse dorée Are more or less Expertly slaughtered So there's finally Peace and quiet (The gods having momentarily Shut up) One can hear A bird sing And a daughter ask her mother Whether she can go to the well And of course she can By that lovely little path That winds through The olive orchard. The thing you need to know about Simic is that in his hands language could be anything. He can truly embody a moment with all the emotional context and make a poem that feels full from a single image. With Simic, life is always a cosmic joke, death is overworked while his lover awaits him at the end of the day, watermelons are something where ‘we eat the smile / and spit out the teeth,’ history books have the face of executioners and the rustle of a newspaper is ‘the silence of the night writing in its diary.’ Simic made a name for himself through his exquisite wordplay that could move between nuanced and layer abstractions to something as simple as My Secret Identity Is // The room is empty, And the window is open.’ He won a Pulitzer for prose poems, a style often overlooked and difficult to perfect but Simic managed to orchestra into something haunting and visceral: My mother was a braid of black smoke. She bore me swaddled over the burning cities. The sky was a vast and windy place for a child to play. We met many others who were just like us. They were trying to put on their overcoats with arms made of smoke. The high heavens were full of little shrunken deaf ears instead of stars. Something that has always charmed me about Simic is the way his words disrupt your reality, jostling it until the pieces align in a new image that gives a lucid impression of the abstract realities coursing through the veins of life. He also does this with poetry in general, having worked of several projects that exist in a poetic realm between prose and verse, and often in communication with images such as photographs of the night sky or boxes in Dime-Store Alchemy (a title I used for social media names often in life). ‘All art is a magic operation, or, if you prefer, a prayer for a new image,’ he writes in Alchemy, and through a poetic remix of the pieces Cornell molded from found objects to leave them teeming with abstract emotion, Simic conjures a new image within the image. ‘Making art in America is about saving one's soul,’ he wrote, and through his words we may not find evidence of a soul (the question of one is often fluttering through his pages) but we certainly find a liminal space of beauty that makes existence worth it all regardless. After reading Dime-Store Alchemy, I took a trip to The Art Institute of Chicago to see Cornell's boxes (they have one of the largest collections of them) only to find they were currently off display and then got stranded by a snowstorm. I sat in a bar writing bad poetry. I think Simic would appreciate that moment, and I have since seen the Cornell boxes. THE BODY This last continent Still to be discovered. My hand is dreaming, is building Its ship. For crew it takes A pack of bones, for food A beer-bottle full of blood. It knows the breath that blows north. With the breath from the west It will sail east each night. The scent of your body as it sleeps Are the land-birds sighted at sea. My touch is on the highest mast. It cries at four in the morning For a lantern to be lit On the rim of the world. It is sad to know Simic has passed on. He is of the last of a group of poets that all meant a lot to me in my early 20s, a group that also all knew each other well. Russell Edson, James Tate, Mark Strand and Charles Simic, all of them now passed on but leaving behind a trail of immaculate poetry to follow them and remember them by. Simic even wrote for Strand after his passing. In his later and last poems, the ones collected beyond this amazing Selected work, Simic’s poetry would seemingly retreat inward, trying to pack as much into as little a space as possible, but would also frequently comment upon an impending death. AT TENDER MERCY O lone streetlight, Trying to shed What light you can On a spider repairing his web This autumn night, Stay with me, As I push further and further Into the dark. Poetry can stop time in order to move around within a moment, but it can’t stop the inevitable. In his final collection Simic includes the following: THE WIND HAS DIED My little boat, Take care. There is no Land is sight. Simic’s little boat may have departed us but what a glorious gift it has left us. I once found his professor email and after too many drinks decided to send him a lengthy and blatantly obviously intoxicated email. I awoke to a response from him where he kindly answered every question and thanked me for my enthusiasm. What a guy, what a poet, what a legend. Farewell to a hero of mine, thanks for the lovely words. 5/5 STONE Go inside a stone That would be my way. Let somebody else become a dove Or gnash with a tiger's tooth. I am happy to be a stone. From the outside the stone is a riddle: No one knows how to answer it. Yet within, it must be cool and quiet Even though a cow steps on it full weight, Even though a child throws it in a river; The stone sinks, slow, unperturbed To the river bottom Where the fishes come to knock on it And listen. I have seen sparks fly out When two stones are rubbed, So perhaps it is not dark inside after all; Perhaps there is a moon shining From somewhere, as though behind a hill- Just enough light to make out The strange writings, the star-charts On the inner walls. EVENING WALK You give the appearance of listening To my thoughts, o trees, Bent over the road I am walking On a late summer evening When every one of you is a steep staircase The night is descending. The leaves like my mother's lips Forever trembling, unable to decide, For there's a bit of wind, And it's like hearing voices, Or a mouth full of muffled laughter, A huge dark mouth we can all fit in Suddenly covered by a hand. Everything quiet. Light Of some other evening strolling ahead, Long-ago evening of long dresses, Pointy shoes, silver cigarette cases. Happy heart, what heavy steps you take As you hurry after them in the thickening shadows. The sky above still blue. The nightbirds like children Who won't come to dinner. Lost children singing to themselves. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
not set
|
not set
|
Jan 10, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1534323864
| 9781534323865
| 1534323864
| 4.18
| 11,042
| Nov 09, 2022
| Nov 15, 2022
|
it was amazing
|
‘Maybe I’d be dead if not for this. But instead I’m going to make something that didn’t exist before. And I think that’s beautiful.’ What is the purpos ‘Maybe I’d be dead if not for this. But instead I’m going to make something that didn’t exist before. And I think that’s beautiful.’ What is the purpose of art? This is a question everyone from philosophers to the drunk next to you at the bar has grappled with since, well, someone first smeared some berries on a wall and someone was affected by it. You can always find the big, heavy quotations that attempt to maximize the beauty into a universal struggle for goodness and connectivity that improves us all, like Leo Tolstoy saying art ‘is a means of union among men, joining them together in the same feelings, and indispensable for the life and progress toward well-being of individuals and of humanity,’ but whew, if this is at a party it’ll kill the vibes pretty quickly. Besides, someone’s got a meme with good graphic design (I’m gonna guess a mountain range) of some shallow quote about Earth just being ‘eh’ without it that will basically cover the same grounds. Sharability, intended audience, subjectivity and what not. What I’m getting at is that maybe the power of art is an artwork all to itself. No, that sounds trite but the idea of letters colliding into a statement that will give a feeling is pretty cool at least, right? I’m getting carried away here What we are gathered for here today is to celebrate Zoe Thorogood and It’s Lonely at the Centre of the Earth, her marvelous ‘auto-bio-graphical novel’ that deals with art, depression, suicide, and just living a life. This is an exciting and wild ride through some heavy territory with a chaos of artistic styles (all of them extraordinary) and stories that form a larger portrait that feels pretty damn…human. There is a frenetic energy that roars forward through this highly metafictional memoir experiment that would feel twee or already well-trodden in lesser hands but becomes this incredible work that feels just as messy and lovely as real life should be. It is a controlled mess, one that is certainly well thought out but reads naturally. Sure, it might be a little over-the-top at times but that’s what makes it work—it pushes everything just a little too far because that zone is where magic is made. You are going to want to read this. This isn’t a light read, but Thorogood blends the harsh introspections with gallows humor and slapstick fun that keeps this bouncing forwards and impossible to put down. The art is fantastic, pivoting between styles and alternating between bright colors to black and white ink frames in a way that feels akin to the ups and downs of moods when struggling with depression. Which, to be fair, is a primary theme of this book. The story follows Zoe writing this book about writing herself for a period of six months, though it sways through the timeline of her entire life as well as into more abstract realms of her creative mind. This is a highly self-conscious book, capturing the very human inner contradictions and inner dialogues we all face, particularly during moments of self-doubt. Thorogood is very open and honest—often under the guise of self-deprecating humor—about her mental health, issues with life and struggles with her family. There is a discussion on depression being passed down through generations while the elder generations view mental health as a ‘dirty secret’ and don’t like how openly she speaks about her own, something I’ve experienced or seen far too often. This is a highly empathetic book, one that you may likely feel is showing you to yourself through the lens of her own self-analysis and so much so that she even jokes about how often people call her work relatable. It is existence exposed in all its messy flaws and joys, a book teeming with life and the feeling that ‘you’re getting older but you don’t know how to grow up.’ Did I mention most people are drawn as people with animal heads? It is awesome. I love her art and vision so much. Some might be quick to dismiss some of the book as naval-gazing or too much pop philosophy, I think that those aspects are some of what makes it work best. Because it is self-conscious about that too, with Thorogood following up bold statements like ‘Reading a book, hearing a song, observing a painting—that’s connection. Sometimes wires get crossed and things get misinterpreted--but that’s pretty damn human, right?’ with a dismissal of it that she is ‘sucking her own dick.’ The self-conscious aspects there are real, and its a great technique (and you can quietly admit to yourself that the lofty moments actually are beautiful while still getting to laugh at yourself for it). This comes across screaming Cool then scowls at the idea of being cool. Which, let’s face it, is pretty cool. But ‘cool’ isn’t the point, because this is about struggling and trying to find your way. It’s so wrapped in layers of self-criticism and sneering at itself that it’s hard to get a hold on, but I think capturing that very thing is what makes this so well done. In the end, this is a book about experiencing and creating art. There are the moments about how it can help or heal, the old Picasso saying stuff like ‘art washes from the soul the dust of everyday life’ vibes. But more importantly the metafictional aspects of creating and how we are in turn created through critical analysis in the minds of others. ‘Zoe was hit with the horrible realization that she was, in fact, a real person. A real person whose art could be perceived and interpreted by other very real people,’ she writes at one point (with a nice line about her book getting polarizing ratings on 카지노싸이트). Art is something we experience, and while it is an individual battle to create, it becomes a social item that everyone consumes, comments on, takes with them in their heart or leaves behind. There is also the fun aspect of realizing how much narratives shape our ideas about life. ‘I didn’t realize until later that the underdog was always the hero because all writers were losers at school,’ she observes at one point on her childhood belief in her own goodness. Which, at heart, is an early lesson on how art reaches out to hold your hand in moments of hardship. She begins to realize her earlier work The Impending Blindness of Billie Scott is very much about creating a narrative of who she is becoming who she wants to be, while this book about writing this very book is more a look at who she is afraid she is becoming. The Covid pandemic figures into the story as well, derailing her success after her first book by canceling her book tour and plunging her into solitude. Connectivity with others becomes a major concept she turns over, examining how much the self is observed as a product of other’s observations, though also how lonely one can be without it. She chronicles friendships, a failed romance and more. While life may not have any answers, what we arrive at here is lovely enough: ‘Someone, somewhere, right now is being impacted by your existence—whether good or bad. That’s what I choose to believe this is all about. Not connection—but how we affect each other. Even at a distance.’ That is as good as any reason to make art. Or to be you and communicate with others. I was touched by this a lot, remembering how I used to leave paintings with favorite poems written on them on trees around my town. Mostly just as an ‘I was here’ but also to hopefully have someone pause, read, and be touched by poetry even for only a moment. And hopefully feel good about the world. So yes, I believe this to be true. Zoe Thorogood’s It’s Lonely at the Centre of the Earth has affected me, I think it is marvelous, and now I am passing it along through this review that might affect you. All without ever really seeing or knowing each other. But I’m also shoving this into the face of every person that walks into the bookstore and library I work at. I hope Thorogood is doing well and will create more art. We can all benefit from being affected by it. 5/5 ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 17, 2022
|
Nov 17, 2022
|
Nov 17, 2022
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0156032899
| 9780156032896
| 0156032899
| 3.87
| 9,944
| Mar 25, 1997
| Apr 03, 2006
|
it was amazing
|
‘If you tell yourself like a story,’ the narrator is told in Lighthousekeeping, ‘it doesn’t seem so bad.’ Storytelling is a defining aspect of humanit
‘If you tell yourself like a story,’ the narrator is told in Lighthousekeeping, ‘it doesn’t seem so bad.’ Storytelling is a defining aspect of humanity, an act that connects us, passes on history, interprets culture and helps us process existence, and here Jeanette Winterson turns their own masterful storytelling toward creating a moving and postmodern ode to the lasting power of storytelling. This novel gripped me from the very start and is certainly a favorite read of the year for the remarkable blend of prose, whimsy and chaotic brilliance that recalls Winterson’s early work but stands alone as a remarkable achievement. Central to the novel is the lighthouse, a dynamic metaphor of stability and a ‘known point in darkness,’ where a young orphan named Silver lives with Pew, the blind lighthouse keeper of indeterminate (or maybe impossible) age. Pew teaches her how to ‘keep the light,’ in which we see the lighthouse not only functions to keep ships from being dashed upon the rocks but that the stories told there keep lives from running aground as well. Told through a cavalcade of stories that crash into each other like waves at sea, Winterson nests the life story of Babel Dark—a preacher caught in a dual existence of light and darkness—into the story of Silver and, though elegant language and intertextuality, crafts a tale that serves as a testament to the lasting power of storytelling. ‘Tell me a story, Pew What story, Child? One that begins again. That’s the story of life. But is it the story of my life? Only if you tell it.’ ‘We tell ourselves stories in order to live,’ wrote Joan Didion, ‘we look for the sermon in the suicide, for the social or moral lesson in the murder of five.’ Human’s create narratives from our lives like an existential search for meaning. This idea was studied in where students were shown an abstract video of moving geometric shapes: most responses to it defined it in terms of a narrative, ascribing emotions and purpose to the images on the screen. Lighthousekeeping is an expression of this existential narrative towards meaning and the novel is structured in a way that reflects that. As is to be expected in Winterson-land, the novel shifts across time and I was frequently reminded of the rejection of linear time and the boisterous humor and historical settings of Sexing the Cherry, the novel that feels closest to Lighthousekeeping. ‘A beginning, a middle and an end is the proper way to tell a story. But I have difficulty with that method,’ Silver tells us, and the narrative comes from all angles of stories punctuating stories with other stories that map out meaning like constellations where each star is a different moment in a life. ‘The stories I want to tell you will light up part of my life, and leave the rest in darkness,’ Silver says, ‘You don’t need to know everything. There is no everything. The stories themselves make the meaning.’ Only small bits of a life are revealed, but done so in a way that assumes a sweeping epic of existence, one that feels empathetic and instructive, such as the lessons learned from Pew’s stories of Babel Dark inform Silver in her own life. ‘Every light had a story—no, every light was a story, and the flashes themselves were the stories going out over the waves, as markers and guides and comfort and warning.’ It is through telling stories that Silver learns to cling to life, such as the sailor lost at sea does by spending his time adrift narrating his own life in a way that he transcends the self and becomes a story that can survive the elements. Born on literally uneven and unsteady ground and quickly orphaned, she essentially becomes another wandering soul drawn to the lighthouse light when Silver and her dog, DogJim, is taken in by Pew. It is here she learns the tradition of storytelling where the lightkeeper would tell stories to the sailors as they ate, then the sailors would tell theirs back. ‘A good keeper was one who knew more stories than the sailors.’ I love this grounding in the idea of interchanging stories, people knowing places by their tales more than their spot on a map, and the passing oral tradition. It seems only natural that this would eventually become central in a Winterson novel, as in her memoir Why Be Happy When You Can Be Normal? she frequently talks about the power of stories on her life and society: ’Stories are compensatory. The world is unfair, unjust, unknowable, out of control. When we tell a story we exercise control, but in such a way as to leave a gap, an opening. It is a version, but never the final one. And perhaps we hope that the silences will be heard by someone else, and the story can continue, can be retold.’ This is paralleled by Silver who says ‘My life is a hesitation in time. An opening in a cave. A gap for a word.’ Feeling like some of the light in her life went out with the loss of her mother, she seeks to be, like a lighthouse, light shining out into the world. ‘Pew taught me that nothing is gone, that everything can be recovered, not as it was, but in its changing form.’ There is a duality to everything in this novel, such as light and dark or life and death, established even before the novel begins with the dual epigraphs ‘Remember you must die’ from Muriel Spark and ‘Remember you must live’ Ali Smith. in typical Wintersonian fashion there is also a dual narrative interweaving across time. While we learn of Silver in the lighthouse and later as an adult stealing birds and romantically entangled with a woman, we also hear the story of Babel Dark as told by Pew. Babel is born into the family that built Pew’s lighthouse 100 years prior along with the Stevenson family (a later generation Stevenson, Robert Louis Stevenson, figures prominently in the novel) and spends his life caught between two existences. He is an unhappily married preacher aside from 2 months each year when he leaves to Bristol to secretly stay with Molly, the love of his youth with whom he had a child. His dual life is implied to inspire Stevenson to write Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde and even Molly completes the dark/light metaphor traveling under the fake name Tenebris (Latin for darkness) and living under the name Lux. ‘ I must teach you how to keep the light…The stories. That’s what you must learn.’ Winterson uses the opportunity to juxtapose Babel and Molly with Tristan and Isolde as well (perhaps the most beautiful writing in the whole book) as Silver and her unnamed partner, which also opens another duality of the novel (and typical element in Winterson): real people/stories interacting with fictional ones. This intertextuality is key to the idea of storytelling, because stories and myths become cultural artifacts and reference points that people can recognize. Hence the popularity of retellings because there is already an established idea to be reworked. Winterson uses allusions and real people such as Charles Darwin or Stevenson to ground the novel in the real and elaborate on their ideas (quick note: Silver, DogJim and Pew all seem a reference of Stevenson’s well-known Treasure Island that features the characters Long John Silver, Jim Hawkins and Blind Pew), as well as examine characters through the lens of already-established narrative framings (another way of Winterson ‘keeping the light’, I suppose). The lighthouse here is certainly in reference to Virginia Woolf’s (Winterson has referred to themself as the literary heir of Woolf) To the Lighthouse, particularly as both novels use it in similar allegorical fashion and as a symbol of stability. We even have Silver state ‘I couldn’t go back. There was only forward, northwards into the sea. To the lighthouse,’ and multiple characters in both refer to themselves as timed to the flashes of light in the lighthouse. Yet again the flashes of light are embedded in the narrative style ‘'the continuous narrative of existence is a lie... there are lit-up moments, and the rest is dark.’ ‘Every wife and sailor had to believe that the unpredictable waves could be calmed by a dependent god. Suppose the unpredictable wave was God?’ Perhaps the most noteworthy intertextual reference is that of the Bible, with allusions to the Tower of Babel and the Flood and the existential undercurrents that plague Babel Dark and his inability to commit. When Babel finds a cave embedded with fossils, it throws his entire perspective of life askew only made more tumultuous by Dawin’s theories. ’Why would God make a world so imperfect that it must be continually righting itself? …now he was faced with a maverick God who had made a world for the fun of seeing how it might develop ...Perhaps there was no God at all.’ If the world is turmoil, if God is the rogue wave that can break the bow, then what to cling to? The answer, simply, is stories. The lighthouse. The known point in the darkness. The method of turning one’s life into a story that will outlive you. It is a love song to literature and the ways we shape reality through our narratives, something Winterson has long addressed such as noting that even Time is a narrative in Sexing the Cherry or the assurance of the refrain ‘I’m telling you stories. Trust me.’ in The Passion. ‘The world was made so that we could find each other in it.’ While the novel states ‘this is not a love story,’ it is only because ‘love is just outside it, looking for a way to break in.’ Winterson’s reflections on love here are only rivaled by the soaringly gorgeous lines in The Passion (my personal favorite) and the movements towards—and failures of—acts of love is the lighthouse to the stormy seas of disparate stories in the book. From Babel’s inability to trust and show love, Silver learns she must speak it, and the lessons from stories live on to inform further generations. It is such a moving expression of how storytelling passes down lessons, warnings, cultural beliefs and more, but also an opportunity for passages that will reorder your heart into a narrative of Winterson’s choosing: ‘I would let death enter me as you had entered me. You had crept along my blood vessels through the wound, and the blood that circulates returns to the heart. You circulated me, you made me blush like a girl in the hoop of your hands. You were in my arteries and my lymph, you were the colour just under my skin, and if I cut myself, it was you I bled. Red Isolde, alive on my fingers, and always the force of blood pushing you back to my heart.’ GOD DAMN. Another aspect of Winterson novel that truly moves me is how much of Winterson there always is in them. The adventures of Silver post-lighthouse dwelling make her one of my favorite Winterson protagonists (she steals books and birds in a few comical scenes), but the adult Silver reflecting on the love they feel with a woman while hidden away at a cottage in the woods is what hits hardest. It is gorgeously romantic and vibrates with the prose from Written on the Body. While Winterson swears their work is always fiction, the elements of their being that seep in can always be detected and make for some of my favorite moments. ‘I am splintered by great waves. I am coloured glass from a church window long sin ce shattered. I find pieces of myself everywhere, and I cut myself handling them.’ Honestly, this novel left me breathless. I basked in the light flashes from Winterson and saw the world in a new context and this one is easily one of my favorite Winterson novels. They can work absolute magic with their narratives, taking what would otherwise seem slight or weak connections but connecting them in such an ephemeral burst of brilliance that it hangs on. One should not expect a direct answer to anything, and the final pages of this novel might seem to be lackluster plot-wise but is also one of my favorite passages of their work, giving you no answers but all the answers at the same time. The lack of concreteness only adds to the effect that the essence of life is ineffable but that we, through our stories, cast wide nets to contain the glow of reality and must not keep it for ourselves but pass it on as a guiding light in the darkness for all lost or weary souls. This one reminded me a lot of Winterson’s first few novels, but with a prose that shines even brighter and a boldness for experimentation with language that shows it can do more than ever expected. Lighthousekeeping is a beacon in the night and a shining work of literature. 5/5 ‘We're here, there, not here, not there, swirling like specks of dust, claiming for ourselves the rights of the universe. Being important, being nothing, being caught in lives of our own making that we never wanted. Breaking out, trying again, wondering why the past comes with us, wondering how to talk about the past at all.’ ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Aug 30, 2022
|
Aug 30, 2022
|
Aug 30, 2022
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0679744479
| 9780679744474
| 0679744479
| 4.08
| 32,684
| 1992
| Feb 01, 1994
|
it was amazing
|
‘Why is the measure of love loss?’ Jeanette Winterson wields words in ways that seem to unlock entire universes hidden in plain sight, her meditations ‘Why is the measure of love loss?’ Jeanette Winterson wields words in ways that seem to unlock entire universes hidden in plain sight, her meditations always blossoming into poetic beauty that keeps the reader in a state of literary rapture. Though there is no blossom without thorns, and her fourth novel, Written on the Body, emotionally stings as much as it seduces. More straightforward than her previous works, constructed more through poetic musings than narrative while still feeling very forward moving and not overly ponderous. In Written, Winterson has no need for her usual magical realism as every sentence is magic in its own right as she writes through a narrator with no gender indicators having a passionate love affair with a married woman. Written on the Body is a deep meditation on the body and frequently forces the reader to examine their own assumptions while playing with both genre and gender in a novel where language is employed as both sexual and subjective as Winterson seizes upon cliches in order to construct something wholly new and unique. ‘The world will come and go in the tide of a day but here is her hand with my future in its palm.’ There is a noticeable shift upon embarking into Winterson’s fourth novel. It is as if suddenly all the elements she cultivated in her previous three novels slid into place, like shards of a broken crystal in fantasy stories, and their union creates a beam of pure poetic light. Each sentence feels effortless yet teeming with power, as if she found the shortcut directly to perfection, and her prose cuts into heady subjects with such grace to let all the philosophical ideas rain down upon the reader. While this novel hits with heavy emotional punches, it is also laugh out loud funny, with Winterson gleefully examining bad relationships and mishaps with gems of lines like ‘She was a committed romantic and an anarcha-feminist. This was hard for her because it meant she couldn't blow up beautiful buildings,’ or more biting wit such as ‘she was a Roman Cardinal, chaste, but for the perfect choirboy.’ As one should expect with Winterson, nothing is simplistic and Written on the Body subverts or resists being pigeonholed at every turn, even breaking away from the formal narrative just over halfway through into a series of near-prose poems about the body, love, and the destructive grip of cancer. For many, when it was released in 1993, the novel was most notable for its lack of gender identification of the narrator. Winterson brilliantly teases expectations and forces the reader to confront their own ideas of gender and sexuality (though it was also criticized as being “inadequately feminist” for presenting a non-specific and likely non-binary narrator). The narrator details many past relationships, most often affairs with married women, before settling down in a passionless but routine and safe relationship with an unremarkable zoo keeper (it manages to not feel like an overly heavy handed metaphor through how blithe and zany the streak of previous relationships are told). Later we learn of their previous relationships with men. This is all a literary game to examine expectations of performing gender, instead discarding gender to focus purely on the emotions of love. As well as a statement on gender as being fluid, not unlike Villanelle in The Passion, or how a character lives as a woman for awhile in Sexing the Cherry to gain a better insight into gendered society and finds they prefer it as a woman, or an identity shared by myself and Winterson. When questioned about gender fluidity , Winterson responded ‘I no longer care whether somebody's male or female. I just don't care,’ and that ‘ I don't think that love should be a gender-bound operation.,’ while more recently saying she finds for herself that ‘gender identity is more fluid.’ As her novels tend to resist singular interpretation, any readings of the character as subverting gender performance expectations, being bisexual, or gender fluid are all likely valid and not necessarily mutually exclusive. ‘You said, 'I love you.' Why is it that the most unoriginal thing we can say to one another is still the thing we long to hear?’ What is certain in this novel is the pure beauty and passion. This is a novel about love, but it rejects being a romance novel. This is a novel about illness and long investigations into how cancer and the body works, but this is not a medical novel. This is a novel about grief, but it is not a grief novel. ‘It’s the clichés that cause the trouble,’ the narrator writes, and Winterson revels in transforming cliched moments into something uniquely hers. ‘I don't want to reproduce, I want to create something entirely new.’ There is something so ineffably charming that the narrator is, in fact, a translator (from Russian to be precise), not only translating the traditional narrative into something post-modern and dynamic but simultaneously finding themselves translated in their lover’s hands. ‘Who taught you to write in blood on my back? Who taught you to use your hands as branding irons? You have scored your name into my shoulders, referenced me with your mark. The pads of your fingers have become printing blocks, you tap a message on to my skin, meaning into my body.’ The body is central to this novel, with frequent passages detailing the delights of or desires for the body—particularly her lover, Louise’s body&mdash. In one of the many reflections on the body that allude to the Song of Solomon of the Bible, Winterson meditates on how the part of the body we touch are the dead skin cells, ‘the dead you is constatnly being rubbed away by the dead me,’ acknowledging the body as the vessel, fragile, temporary, through which we love one another. 'Bone of my bone. Flesh of my flesh. To remember you, it’s my own body I touch. Thus she was, here and here. The physical memory blunders through the doors the mind has tried to seal. A skeleton key to Bluebeard’s chamber. The bloody key that unlocks pain. Wisdom says forget, the body howls. Thus she was, here and here.' Winterson uses specific language to the interactions of the body, frequently terms like ‘discovery’ and ‘voyage’ that recall ships at sea headed to new lands. However, love, we find, is not one of colonization—something that could be argued is Louise’s husband, Elgin’s, interpretation of love and his desire to own and control her—but one of mutual discovery and collaboration. ‘Louise, in this single bed, between these garish sheets, I will find a map as likely as any treasure hunt. I will explore you and mine you and you will redraw me according to your will. We shall cross one another's boundaries and make ourselves one nation.’ In a passage that recalls a central theme to her earlier novel, The Passion, the narrator reflects ‘There is no discovery without risk and what you risk reveals what you value.’ Their discovery of Louise opens the possibility of lack of Louise, and just when they unite most, the narrator unattached and flees (for complicated reasons you’ll have to read the novel to discover yourself) in the belief that their sacrifice of love is made for love because they truly value Louise. There are several nods to The Passion here, even beyond the love interest being characterized by untamed, fiery red hair such as Winterson’s direct shoutout to the refrain ‘trust me, I’m telling you stories,’ and adding ‘I can change the story. I am the story.’ This is the metafiction territory I really enjoy and where Winterson manages to border into magic without her use of magical realism. Confronted by their boss, Gail, a woman who openly asserts her desire for the narrator in the face of the narrator’s relative disinterest (a great line about how even when you lose your looks you don’t lose your desire for another ensues here), the narrator is accused of considering Louise less as a person and more as a character they have created. A character in their own story of useless martyrdom. ‘It's as if Louise never existed,’' the narrator muses, ‘like a character in a book. Did I invent her?’ In a novel so tuned into language and its many forms, this becomes a story less about the impact of love but the flaws of language to properly reproduce love, all questioning if our language of love creates a character out of the beloved or if we, truly, love them as being-in-itself to riff on Heidegger. Yet, ‘love demands expression.’ She quotes Caliban from The Tempest: ‘You taught me language; and my profit on't/Is, I know how to curse./The red plague rid you/For learning me your language! ’ This novel is about the possibilities of giving linguistic life to love. ‘Is this the proper ending? If not the proper then the inevitable?’ Sadly, this novel is also about giving life to the grief that follows the absence of love. The narrator goes through a stage-of-grief of sorts, even visiting a church to be in the presence of other people’s faith, or attending a random funeral they stumble upon in which the reader is treated to some jaw-dropping and heartbreaking philosophizing about death of a loved one, the end of the body: ‘The body that has lain beside you in sickness and in health. The body your arms still long for dead or not. You were intimate with every muscle, privy to the eyelids moving in sleep. This is the body where your name is written, passing into the hands of strangers.’ In her memoir, Why Be Happy When You Could Be Normal?, Winterson states ‘There are three kinds of big endings: Revenge. Tragedy. Forgiveness.’ She adds that ‘Revenge and tragedy often happen together. Forgiveness redeems the past. Forgiveness unblocks the future.’ This novel is the possibility of all three in one. There is the revenge scene, deliciously wicked and violent (I love it when Winterson chooses violence) all in the face of tragedy. Yet there is hope, a letting go of the past that aims directly towards the future. The narrator has gone on a journey of discovery, gone into exile, and has now returned with a lesson learned and a horizon to continue chasing. It is the hero's journey as a romance novel, it is the fairy tale of love and language. ‘You deciphered me and now I am plain to read. The message is a simple one; my love for you. I want you to live. Forgive my mistakes. Forgive me.’ I could rant about Winterson all day, as I’ve basically done patchworking this review together over the span of 24hrs. She speaks to me though, and each work is a unique and dazzling display of both heart and mind eager to create, to style, and to show it all to you. But mostly, Winterson has a direct prose that soars. Written on the Body is a fantastic work that teases expectations only to subvert them, taking you to the precipice of the cliche and through a magical portal into a brilliant realm of literary extravagance. She exposes constructs and dismantles them, such as gender performance, genre narratives and even marriage (‘marriage is the flimsiest weapon against desire.’) and embarks with the reader on a love affair with language and experimentation. This is a showstopper of a novel and one that will live rent-free in my heart. 5/5 ‘I don’t know if this is a happy ending but here we are let loose in open fields.’ ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jun 21, 2022
|
Jun 21, 2022
|
Jun 21, 2022
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0307401243
| 9780307401243
| 0307401243
| 4.01
| 45,178
| Oct 25, 2011
| Mar 06, 2012
|
it was amazing
|
‘Love. The difficult word. Where everything starts, where we always return. Love. Love’s lack. The possibility of love.’ ‘I have written love narrativ ‘Love. The difficult word. Where everything starts, where we always return. Love. Love’s lack. The possibility of love.’ ‘I have written love narratives and loss narratives,’ Winterson writes, ‘it all seems so obvious now – the Wintersonic obsessions of love, loss and longing. It is my mother.’ Jeanette Winterson’s stern adoptive mother given to religious excess casts a long shadow over her memoir, Why Be Happy When You Could Be Normal, the title coming from a response she gave to Winterson telling her that she is happy loving another woman, and Winterson turns her perfect prose and brilliant mind that has crafted dazzling and fantastical stories inward to examine her own history. It is a harrowing exploration of the self, reading much like a companion to her exquisite and semi-autobiographical debut novel, Oranges are Not the Only Fruit but going further and exploring the harsh memories that she fictionalized because she ‘wrote a story I could live with. The other one was too painful. I could not survive it.’ From her harsh upbringing, her breaking away and plunging into literature and, many years later, seeking out her birth mother, Winterson chronicles her life and insights into a memoir that bombards with both humor and emotional blows to deliver a memoir that is as page turning and searingly beautiful as her best novels. Really all I want to do is get a soapbox and shout how wonderful Winterson's work is, something anyone who knows me has likely endured lately. Her works have the right combination of soaring beauty with grit and teeth. I don't know what I can accomplish here beyond recommending her, because she is an author that has totally consumed me lately and I'm so glad of it. Love is the gravity of life and at the center of each Winterson work and here we see how the vast depths of love can also toss you asunder as waves of pain dash against you. Yet for those who hold fast and sail on til morning, love can rise again from the horizons of uncertainty. ‘Fiction and poetry are doses, medicines. What they heal is the rupture reality makes on the imagination.’ Written in real time for the latter half, we can read Winterson reading herself with the writing as a therapeutic act as much as it is a literary portrait of an undeniably amazing artist. ‘I was writing the past and discovering the future,’ she says, and her faith in the written word to heal and instruct is infectiously lovely. ‘Books have always been light and warmth to me,’ and across the whole of her memoir we see several instances where books, be it reading or writing them, become an anchor as well as a ladder to climb as an escape and a path upwards to the future. When Mrs. Winterson discovers her secret stash of books—she was forbidden from reading any book beyond the three her mother okay’d—she burns them in the backyard. “‘Fuck it,’ I thought, ‘I can write my own,’” she says, contemplating how her attempts to collect the half-burned scraps, ‘these fragments I have shored against my ruin’ quoting from T.S. Eliot, came alive in her own novels that seem a collection of ‘scraps uncertain of continuous narrative.’ This book dredges up the childhood that made her works possible, and the journeys of the heart that mapped the way. ’I believe in fiction and the power of stories because that way we speak in tongues. We are not silenced. All of us, when in deep trauma, find we hesitate, we stammer; there are long pauses in our speech. The thing is stuck. We get our language back through the language of others. We can turn to the poem. We can open the book. Somebody has been there for us and deep-dived the words.’ As much as books were a rock for Winterson, her own works have been a comfort for many readers to come. ‘I needed words because unhappy families are conspiracies of silence,’ she says, ‘When we write we offer the silence as much as the story. Words are the part of silence that can be spoken.’ ‘Home is much more than shelter; home is our centre of gravity…Home was problematic for me. It did not represent order and it did not stand for safety.’ Through these words she delivered what she refers to as a ‘cover version’ of her childhood in Oranges, with the reader discovering here that many of the events were much harsher than presented in the novel, and from it her past and relationship with her mother became bestseller stories to the general public (the book opens with a phone conversation with a horrified Mrs. Winterson after the release of the book). ‘It isn’t ‘my past’, is it,’ she states, ‘I have written over it. I have recorded on top of it. I have repainted it. Life is layers, fluid, unfixed, fragments,’ and examines the beauty of self-mythologizing. ‘I would rather go on reading myself as a fiction than as a fact,’ she repeats across the book, which is an idea that is a root to her own novels where reality and history are blended with magical realism to become a sort of fairy tale. And what better way to examine a life and turn writing into a therapy for trauma than a storytelling medium where size and shape is often ‘approximation and unstable,’ and feeling unwanted or cast out—as she was from her own home—can become a heroic act to survive. There is also a lot of religious trauma to survive, and Winterson examines how growing up leaving presents out for the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse or embroidering 'the summer has ended and we are not yet saved' on her bag certainly set her apart from her peers. But it also becomes something that attempts to alienate her from herself, attempting to make her feel shame for her very natural attraction to other women. They perform a straight up exorcism on her, it's a lot. But the real kicker is seeing, once again, love not be there when it should be. Her adopted mother, then her girlfriend who renounces her. It's a tragedy, and one far more heartbreaking than was seen in novel form. ‘A tough life needs a tough language – and that is what poetry is. That is what literature offers – a language powerful enough to say how it is. It isn’t a hiding place. It is a finding place.’ Interesting as well are Winterson’s stories of her education and eventually going to Oxford. While she says she was not a great student ‘I knew how words worked in the way that some boys knew how engines worked.’ But if being a lesbian was what had her cast out from her childhood and shunned by her neighbors, she discovered that in academia simply being a woman was a barrier. ‘Oxford was not a conspiracy of silence as far as women were concerned,’ she writes of the books taught there, ‘it was a conspiracy of ignorance.’ An English teacher tells her ‘when a woman alone is no longer of any interest to the opposite sex, she is only visible where she has some purpose,’’ and during this period we see the origins of many of her critiques on gendered society and misogyny start to take shape. Not only that, but she observes how much gatekeeping pushes people out, being told on her first day that she is ‘ the working-class experiment’ while her friend is the ‘Black experiment.’ Though she sees these barriers and academic circling of the wagons as a challenge to overcome and overthrow, which is also very present in her narratives. ’Later, when I was successful, but accused of arrogance, I wanted to drag every journalist who misunderstood to this place, and make them see that for a woman, a working-class woman, to want to be a writer, to want to be a good writer, and to believe that you are good enough, that was not arrogance; that was politics.’ Something Winterson does so well in this book is keep the reader firmly gripped by the waves of prose, rocking us through anecdotes and humorous observations about a life safely behind her, so that when the storm comes we are too far out at sea to turn back and must weather the maelstrom of emotions with her. ‘There are two kinds of writing; the one you write and the one that writes you,’ she observes, ‘The one that writes you is dangerous. You go where you don’t want to go. You look where you don’t want to look.’ The second half of this memoir is the real treasure. While more chaotic than the first, and admittedly written in real time, it chronicles the emotional journey of trying to find her birth mother. Following a breakup and a period of sorrow where ‘I was always ready to jump off the roof of my own life,’ Jeanette takes on her quest, complete with companions who join along the way such as , who would be her partner for many years (I screamed when it was revealed author Ali Smith told Jeanette to ‘just kiss her and see’). She learns that ‘People’s lives are less important than procedure,’ as legal hiccups thwart her and prolong the process to the point of emotional pain. But it is a beautiful tale of discovering what she needed to hear all along: ‘You were wanted, Jeanette.’ I think this beautiful sentiment makes the whole book worth reading. ‘to stand on the rim of your life and look down into the crater…’ The problem with real life is that it isn’t a fairy tale and there are no tidy endings. But that is also what makes it beautiful, even if tragically so. Winterson’s emotional journey is quite the tale, one that has more open ends than questions answered. I was particularly moved by her examination of a life that never was but could have been and how, even compared to the trauma of her past, she was happy to be the person she turned out to be. ‘I would rather be this me,’ she confesses, ‘than the me I might have become without books, without education, and without all the things that have happened to me along the way.’ Even to Mrs. W she observes that ‘she was a monster, but she was my monster,’ and this line has really stuck with me. There were times when I worried it was beginning to romanticize mental health struggles and coming from a place of trauma, but right then she delivers one of the best lines in the book: ‘Creativity is on the side of health – it isn’t the thing that drives us mad; it is the capacity in us that tries to save us from madness.’ She writes beautifully about how in times of mental health struggles we have to confront the creature within us, and she finds the best way for her to do so is through writing. We are all lucky to be able to observe these moments. As much as I love her story, some of the best moments are simply Winterson talking about literature and about the ways it interacts with time and humanity. I don’t think I’ve ever underlined a book as much as this one and you will likely be finding Winterson quotes pop up in many of my reviews forever now. Here’s a taste: 'Creative work bridges time because the energy of art is not time-bound. If it were we should have no interest in the art of the past, except as history or documentary. But our interest in art is our interest in ourselves both now and always. Here and forever. There is a sense of the human spirit always existing. This makes our own death bearable. Life + art is a boisterous communion/communication with the dead. It is a boxing match with time.’ This is an essential read for any Witnerson fan, but also for any lover of literature in general, and she provides an excellent list of other books to check out that were pivotal to her growth as a reader and writer. I was glad I read this directly following Oranges, and honestly this ranks with the best of her works. She has such a strong voice and the fragmentary aspects of this memoir, often told jumbled along the timeline, isn’t all that different than her novels. This is a work of startling beauty that plunges canyonous emotional depths and all I can say is Jeanette Winterson is an absolute icon. I love her, I love her works, and I can’t wait to read more. 5/5 ‘The facts are, after all, only the facts, and the yearning passionate part of you will not be met there. That is why reading ourselves as a fiction as well as fact is so liberating. The wider we read the freer we become.’ ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 20, 2022
|
May 13, 2022
|
Apr 20, 2022
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1609453999
| 9781609453992
| 1609453999
| 3.38
| 14,193
| Apr 2005
| Jun 06, 2017
|
it was amazing
|
Some books feel like a warm, heavy blanket on a crisp morning, something you take in soft and slow and while you are getting nowhere fast you are ever
Some books feel like a warm, heavy blanket on a crisp morning, something you take in soft and slow and while you are getting nowhere fast you are everywhere you want to be. The Nakano Thrift Shop by Hiromi Kawakami—lovingly and gorgeously translated by the always impressive Allison Markin Powell—was just that sort of book for me and a balm on my soul when I needed it. A quiet little novel about the employees and regulars of second-hand antiques store in Western Tokyo, this book shows how much can be accomplished through the strength of well-written characters without needing much of a plot to propel you forward. The two young employees, Takeo and our narrator, Hitomi, live in the casual world of their employer, the enigmatic and eccentric Mr. Nakano, and slowly take in the local gossip and fall in and out of love with each other. It is such a charming book with a sharp comic sensibility and enough heart to wrap you up in a blissful reading experience as it examines interpersonal relationships and introspective anxieties in a world rapidly changing and speeding up when all one wants to do is slow down and embrace the beauty in the details. ‘Ours was a strange world, in which whatever was new and neat and tidy diminished in value.’ This book was very close to my heart for many reasons. Essentially it is a book that grows storytelling through local gossip, and as someone who is admittedly a workplace gossiper...well, these are my people. One of my jobs is working in a local bookstore with a small staff nestled in our bustling downtown. So much of the casual small store aesthetics and slowly piecing together the stories of locals and locales reminded me of why I love that job and how much I appreciate the people I work with. This is a book about people and their habits, quirks, charms and flaws and Kawakami brings them to life so seemingly effortlessly that by the end of the novel you feel like you, too, have known and interacted with these characters. The glue holding everything together in this book is Mr. Nakano. An aging and charismatic yet quirky womanizer, Nakano’s offbeat personality is so affable and adorable you can’t help but enjoy him despite the fact that he’s kind of a shit. I feel bad for his (third) wife, who is mentioned but never present despite his mistress Sakiko becoming central to several sections of the novel and an empathetic and lovable character. He has a verbal crutch of saying ‘you know what I mean?’ to dive into his conversations, something a former manager during my Barnes and Noble days also said and why on her final day at our store a good friend signed her going-away card with “I guess we’ll never know what you meant”. Kawakami excels at piling details like this upon small detail after small detail to create a larger-than-the-sum-of-their-parts atmosphere and overall body of the novel. It could be said to be a novel about details, which is, honestly, an aspect of this book I like best. While there is still a slow-burn forward progress to the overarching narrative, the structure of the book breaks it down to anecdotal storylines by chapter, with chapter titles attached to a different item that crosses the doorway of Nakano’s shop during that segment. Each chapter becomes a different set of gossip and discussions to examine the characters from a new angle or further their introspective ideas about each other. The effect is as if we the reader are handling the characters and inspecting them the way a customer in Nakano’s shop might with the antiques. Many of these discussions provoke sexual aspects, such as a packet of nude photos sold by a shady older customer, or Sakiko’s erotica fiction drafts that befuddle Mr. Nakano because he considers himself too polite of a lover to satisfy these desires. The coziness and cuteness of the novel is hilariously offset with a strong sexual undercurrent with much of the drama surrounding Nakano and Masayo’s (his older sister) love lives (a funny saga occurs early when Nakano bribes Hitomi to casually get info from Masayo about who she is dating, who counter-bribes Hitomi to not reveal anything). Then, of course, there is the sexual tension between Hitomi and Takeo in their awkward on-again-off-again not-quite-dating interactions. ‘...the idea of spending the rest of my life like this — going through my days in a fog of anxiety and fear’ Much of the young love plotline becomes a wonderful examination on anxieties and confidence. Takeo masks his anxieties of life through a quiet aloofness that never gives away much of what he is thinking, which makes him difficult to read for Hitomi. ‘People scare me,’ confides Takeo. But her anxieties over her inability to understand Takeo becomes a springboard of self-realization that she doesn’t even understand her own desires. ’When Takeo said the word ‘scare’ the fear that I had been feeling this whole week blew up inside of me all at once. That’s because it is scary. I’m scary. Takeo is scary. Waiting is scary. Tadokoro, Mr. Nakano, Sakiko, Masayo, and even Mr. Crane — they were all scary. Even more frightening was my own self.’ Much of these fears is what makes the thrift shop an ideal place for them to be, secluded from much of the world in a warm and supportive small circle of acquaintances. Yet it is also fairly insular as Hitmoi realizes when Nakano’s two mistresses are friends of each other and none of them know anyone outside the local antiques industry. Like the envelope that held the customer’s pornographic photos, described as fitting the photos so snugly it becomes difficult to get the photos in and out, the thrift shop is snug, comforting and secure but also restrictive. These anxieties around growth and change reveal themselves in other ways too. While Masayo may be the most emotionally matured of them all, her mind tends to often be on notions of aging and how to appropriately grow into her age. This is contrasted with Nakano who seems to fill his time with affairs and antiques in order to avoid growing up and looking towards a future which is coming whether they like it or not. Nakano’s Shop is, in effect, an outlet for the comforts of golden age nostalgia. It represents a return to tradition as well as an escape from modernity. The Nakano family is said to be a long line of land owners who have eventually lost their wealth and the store seems to emotionally be the last link back to the past through the antiques. In Strange Weather in Tokyo, Kawakami explores the waning of traditional society and it’s relationship with nature in an ever modernizing and faster-paced world and many of these ideas are quietly examined here as well. Much like the older lover who despises cellphones in Strange Weather, Hitomi reflects on how increasing connectivity can be damaging to interpersonal relationships, such as her own mental health struggles as she obsesses over calling Takeo during their period of silence: ‘I hate cellphones...there has been no greater evil for love affairs—those that are going well as much as those that are going badly—due to the greatly increased ability to receive phone calls no matter where you are, no matter what the situation.’ The slow, soothing pace of the shop is contrasted with Hitomi’s life later in the fast-paced office world. ‘I made copies, I ran errands, I filed vouchers, I created documents,’ she says of her time in a place where people are always ‘glued to their desk,’ hardly anyone speaks to each other and she sees the agitation of those who often stay at work through the night. It is more productive, but does it feel even halfway as fulfilling as the shop? Like Strange Weather, this book also paces itself and adapts its tone to the changing seasons as a constant reminder of time’s unstoppable progress. Pets and people die, the store must turn towards online auctions to stay relevant, people come and people go. What is lasting, however, are the impressions we make on each other. The conclusion of this book is rather effective in the way it reminds the reader of the impressions left upon us by all the characters, major and minor, in The Nakano Thrift Shop. While I tend to find tidy endings trite, this one really worked and wrapped the novel in a perfect emotional bow. This was one of the most enjoyable reading experiences I have had all year and was a blast of serotonin and good vibes that I truly needed. I even enjoyed this more than Strange Weather in Tokyo. Cute, charming and comical, The Nakano Thrift Shop was a massive success for me and one I won’t soon forget. 5/5 ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 10, 2021
|
Oct 15, 2021
|
Oct 10, 2021
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0380003821
| 9780380003822
| B002JJ32DW
| 4.25
| 141,973
| 1974
| Jul 1975
|
it was amazing
|
‘You cannot buy the revolution. You cannot make the revolution. You can only be the revolution. It is in your spirit, or it is nowhere.’ Reading The Di ‘You cannot buy the revolution. You cannot make the revolution. You can only be the revolution. It is in your spirit, or it is nowhere.’ Reading The Dispossessed by Ursula K. Le Guin was likely the biggest literary event of the year for me. This endlessly quotable book gripped me on every level and the way Le Guin can examine and explain ideas is so fluid, especially how she crafts such functioning worlds for her characters and ideas to move around in. Told in a rotating timeline with the past events catching up to those in the present (a narrative structure that functions as an expression of several of the book’s themes), we follow Shevek’s life as a physicist growing up in a anarchist-style society and then his time on a highly capitalist society on the planet Urras as he struggles to develop a working theory of time that incorporates both cyclical and linear time. Shevek’s experience juxtaposes the two societies as he realizes his ideas can be very dangerous in a society that only values profit and power. So many intelligent discussions of this book already exist that I likely have nothing to add, but I love this book so much and wanted to get my thoughts down. Through exploring the multiple meanings of the word “revolution,” Le Guin explores society and sociolinguistics in this incredible book about freedom and sharing the struggles of others to help build a better world. ‘At present we seem only to write dystopias,’ Ursula K. Le Guin , ‘perhaps in order to be able to write a utopia we need to think yinly.’ She was speaking, of course, about the concept of yin and yang, something that seems present in much of her work and especially highlighted by the two societies in The Dispossessed. Le Guin contrasts two societies, the planet Urras full of war and stark inequality and the anarchist society that settled on the moon Anarres, and uses the juxtaposition to examine how to theorize on reconfiguring social systems to be ethical and free. Though as states the subtitle in original publications, this is An Ambiguous Utopia and Le Guin is not here to give answers but to tell a story within the landscape of these ethical musings, one that should give birth to further thought, further theory and further striving to better the world. In , Le Guin said ‘When I got the idea for The Dispossessed, the story I sketched out was all wrong, and I had to figure out what it really was about and what it needed. What it needed was first about a year of reading all the Utopias, and then another year or two of reading all the Anarchist writers.’ She admits the book is heavily based in the writings of Lao Tzu (his book Tao Te Ching has been translated by Le Guin), Paul Goodman, and Pyotr Kropotkin, though other anarchist thinkers such as Emma Goldman and Mikhail Bakunin seem to also inform many of the ideas present as well. Le Guin was heavily influenced in all her works by taoism, and Paul Goodman’s work often showed taoism as a contributor towards a coherent theory of anarchism. The Dispossessed details a style of taoist anarchism that is similar to those expressed in another Le Guin novel, The Lathe of Heaven, one being that a revolution cannot rely on political or authorities but on a deep engagement between the individual and the world around us where we become the change we wish to see in the world. ‘The freedom to think involves the courage to stumble upon our demons.’ -Simone Weil, On the Abolition of All Political Parties The change Shevek wishes to see originates in his work with time theories but he quickly realizes how immersed in political struggle his life is. Le Guin fans are treated to the creation of the ansible, a communication device that is present in the Hannish books, particularly The Left Hand of Darkness, a device many players on the planet Urras are trying to help him create it but also to control it. His studies on time require him to combine two different concepts of time: Sequency and Simultaneity, with the former endorsing a linear concept of time and the latter for non-linear time, such as recursive theories. Shevek must transcend constructs that have been considered rational thought to a more radical theory of time, as a sort of postmodernist anarchist that must hold both modes of time in his mind at once in order to achieve his goal. F. Scott Fitzgerald once wrote that ‘the test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposing ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function,’ so I suppose we can rightfully claim Shevek as a genius here. His biggest hurdle, it would seem, is less the creation of his working theory but the hurdles of power. On Anarres he is stifled by others who can block his publication or wish to take the credit, while on Urras it will be used for profit, power, and likely warmaking. ‘Free your mind of the idea of deserving, the idea of earning, and you will begin to be able to think.’ Shevek’s Odian society on Anarres is set-up to have ‘ no law but the single principle of mutual aid between individuals,’ (Mutual Aid by Pyotr Kropotkin being an largely influential work in anarchist theory and this novel). It is a harsh planet where horizontal organization has kept the society going, with people assigned to rotating jobs to best befit the current needs to keep the society going. They have no sense of private property and everything is a community (even families where there are no individual family units). This contrasts with Urras, which is a capitalist society where profit and private property is the primary function (hence why the Odians refer to them as ‘propetarians’). While the harsh climate and scarcity of resources on Anarres may have been fertile soil for their style of society to work, they have developed a concept of communal society that see’s it’s function as one to remove unnecessary suffering. ‘We can't prevent suffering. This pain and that pain, yes, but not Pain. A society can only relieve social suffering - unnecessary suffering. The rest remains. The root, the reality.’ This contrasts with Urras where all the bad-faith bootstraps mythologies created a hierarchical society where chasing profits removes suffering from the elites but displaces it onto the lower classes, the very sort of thing the Odians fled to establish their society in the mining colonies on the moon Anarres. ‘To make a thief, make an owner; to create crime, create laws.’ -Odian teaching ‘The essential function of the state is to maintain the existing inequality’ wrote activist Nicolas Walter in About Anarchism, which is why Odians do not believe in any forms of State-ruled government. There are several different government styles on Urras, though Shevek sees them all as inevitable towards oppression. ‘The individual cannot bargain with the State,’ Shevek says, ‘the State recognizes no coinage but power: and it issues the coins itself.’ Even the thinly-disguised Soviet Russia country in the book (which is currently engaged in a proxy war with the strong capitalist country) repulses Shevek for still maintaining a government over the people telling their envoy ‘the revolution for justice which you began and then stopped halfway.’ Freedom, he argues, only comes from a collective society. To the idea of individualism, Shevek notes that what is society but a collective of individuals working towards a common goal. 'You put another lock on the door and call it democracy.' While the glamour of Urras is charming to him at first, he begins to see how rotten it is at the core and how profit figures into everything, especially when his ideas are dismissed and questioned why he should be allowed to pursue them without a clear profit motive. ‘There is nothing you can do that profit does not enter into, and fear of loss, and wish for power. You cannot say good morning without knowing which of you is 'superior' to the other, or trying to prove it. You cannot act like a brother to other people, you must manipulate them, or command them, or obey them, or trick them. You cannot touch another person, yet they will not leave you alone. There is no freedom.’ While Shevek sees that because his people own nothing, they are free, those of Urras only have the illusion of freedom, he discovers, and in their quest to own things are thereby owned by them. ‘They think if people can possess enough things they will be content to live in prison’ Shevek thinks. Interestingly enough, early in his youth he and his friends learned the concept of prison and decided to play-act it but the reader quickly realizes ‘it was playing them.’ They are so enticed into their roles they are okay with harming each other (‘they decided that Kadagv had asked for it’) which makes for excellent commentary on how hierarchy breeds violence and oppression. ‘All the operations of capitalism were as meaningless to him as the rites of a primitive religion as barbaric, as elaborate, and as unnecessary,’ Le Guin writes of our hero. To create this effect, Le Guin has done something extraordinary here by making sociolinguistics highly important to the novel as indicators of the different societies. Drawing on the that the structure of a language influences the native speaker’s perceptions and categorization of experiences. The linguistic relativity is seen in the Anarras language of Pravic, where there is an aversion to singular possessive pronouns since they imply property. Sadik (Shevek’s daughter) for instance, calls him The Father not, my father, or says ‘share the handkerchief I use’ instead of my handkerchief. The language removes a lot of ideas of shame and patriarchy as well. ‘Pravic was not a good swearing language. It is hard to swear when sex is not dirty and blashpemy does not exist.’ Even the language of Urras is alarming to Shevek. His language removes any class-based hierarchy, so prefixes such as being called Dr. are offensive to him. He notices that class dialects occur on Urras as well, with his servant, Efor, code-switching between them. THe upper classes on Urras tend to have a drawl to their words. Late in the novel when the Terran ambassador arrives (it’s a Hannish book, of course the Terrans show up), it is said of Pravic that it was ‘the only rationally invented language that has become the tongue of a great people.‘ Written in the 60s, the language aspects feel relevant to today’s world when there is much political discourse on the way language morphs with a changing society. Language and the way we apply it is culturally influenced, and linguistic signifiers can be reflective of culture, and there is often much argument online if adapting language to fit modern needs is social conditioning or simply just using the malleability of language to be more productive or empathetic in the rhetoric we choose to apply in various situations (Le Guin, for the record, frequently defended the singular ‘they’ in language [see the final question in the previously mentioned ]). David Foster Wallace wrote at length in his essay on social and political influences on debates over descriptive vs prescriptive grammar changes, and to see Le Guin incorporate sociolinguistics as signifiers for her two societies is quite wonderful. ‘I want the walls down. I want solidarity, human solidarity.’ The language barrier is a great example of how The Dispossessed toys with concepts of walls. The novel opens with a description of a wall and the question of how inside/outside being on of perception. Shevek frequently comments on how he wishes to tear down walls, and his message of revolution is not one of taking the power back but of abolition of power. No walls, no barriers, only unity. For that reason he cannot allow his device to be used for war, or nationalistic purposes as he realized those on Urras will want (he sees how racism occurs due to concepts of walls while there). ’You the possessors are the possessed. You are all in jail. Each alone, solitary, with a heap of what he owns. You live in prison, die in prison. It is all I can see in your eyes—the wall, the wall!’ Revolution has many meanings in this novel. The overthrow of the system or a cycle such as his concept of time. But it is also shown that revolution isn’t a single act but a continuous cycle as well. The Terrans say they have seen it all, tried everything, but ‘if each life is not new, each single life, then why are we born.’ There must be a constant striving towards betterment, reshaping, undoing, rebuilding. Anarres is not perfect either, hence the ambiguous utopia, and there must be the drive to keep going. Hence the open ended conclusion to the novel. 'Society was not against them. It was for them; with them; it was them.' The Dispossessed is such a magnificent work. The ideas are great, the writing is sharp and engaging, and there is an epic feel to the story as it draws on structures such as the hero’s quest. I love how Le Guin tends towards a style of storytelling via anthropology, and the political discourse in this only heightens my enjoyment of it. She was a brilliant writer and this book is such a powder keg of extraordinary thoughts wrapped in a a science fiction narrative. It is so endlessly quotable you could practically build a religion out of it. All the stars in the 카지노싸이트 cosmos aren’t enough to award this novel for how much I love it. 5/5 ‘I come with empty hands and the desire to unbuild walls.’ ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Aug 23, 2021
|
Sep 05, 2021
|
Aug 23, 2021
|
Mass Market Paperback
|
s.penkevich
>
Books:
favorites
(62)
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
![]() |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.33
|
it was amazing
|
Jun 18, 2025
|
Jun 18, 2025
|
||||||
4.28
|
it was amazing
|
Mar 13, 2025
|
Mar 13, 2025
|
||||||
4.32
|
it was amazing
|
Feb 21, 2025
|
Feb 21, 2025
|
||||||
4.12
|
it was amazing
|
Nov 15, 2024
|
Nov 10, 2024
|
||||||
3.86
|
it was amazing
|
Oct 16, 2024
|
Feb 29, 2024
|
||||||
4.05
|
it was amazing
|
Dec 07, 2023
|
Dec 07, 2023
|
||||||
4.17
|
it was amazing
|
not set
|
Dec 04, 2023
|
||||||
3.66
|
it was amazing
|
Nov 19, 2023
|
Nov 19, 2023
|
||||||
4.40
|
it was amazing
|
Sep 12, 2023
|
Sep 12, 2023
|
||||||
4.31
|
it was amazing
|
Mar 12, 2024
|
Jul 22, 2023
|
||||||
4.57
|
it was amazing
|
not set
|
Jun 06, 2023
|
||||||
4.17
|
it was amazing
|
May 07, 2023
|
Apr 11, 2023
|
||||||
4.08
|
it was amazing
|
Mar 15, 2023
|
Mar 15, 2023
|
||||||
4.27
|
it was amazing
|
not set
|
Jan 10, 2023
|
||||||
4.18
|
it was amazing
|
Nov 17, 2022
|
Nov 17, 2022
|
||||||
3.87
|
it was amazing
|
Aug 30, 2022
|
Aug 30, 2022
|
||||||
4.08
|
it was amazing
|
Jun 21, 2022
|
Jun 21, 2022
|
||||||
4.01
|
it was amazing
|
May 13, 2022
|
Apr 20, 2022
|
||||||
3.38
|
it was amazing
|
Oct 15, 2021
|
Oct 10, 2021
|
||||||
4.25
|
it was amazing
|
Sep 05, 2021
|
Aug 23, 2021
|